What is the new type of scientific method that has been developed especially for evolution? |
If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.
New Scientific MethodIt should be mentioned that scientific method does not, in itself, have the capacity to prove either a young or an old Earth. Both positions use the same scientific facts to come to very different conclusions based on either presupposition or direct revelation. Some would say it this way: the differences are in the beliefs, and those beliefs are based either in presuppositions or in revelation. The same applies to Evolution. Scientists apply scientific method in order to use their beliefs to make speculations that are consistent with those beliefs about what happened in the past. Some are aware that this is the process that they are using, but most, especially those on the side of Evolutionism and Old-Earthism, are totally oblivious to their bias. Logic can only have at its basis one of three things: revelation, circularity, or assumption (which is vapor). There is a new type of scientific method that requires no observation. It was developed because no hypothesis of origins can be proven using true scientific method. With real science, all we can do is to compare the theoretical conjecture / fabrication to the world around us. We can only examine it and see if it matches what we can observe. With that in mind, it is interesting to note that the intelligent design model does fit the physical scientific evidence while the molecules-to-man evolution conjecture / fabrication does not. (Intelligent design is a term that is being used to pacify evolutionists. Within the limits of the evolutionist's presuppositions there can be no God--a basic Atheist theology. Why they chose to add this unscientific limitation to their conjecture / fabrication in the first place, one could only guess.) So evolutionists prefer the words, "intelligent design." Evolution isn't science. Ungodly people are forced to hold on tightly to some basic presuppositions. These presuppositions are just simple-minded assumptions. They are filters and a way to filter out any information that supports the existence of God. They set up a web of rules to filter out God. They will only accept those things that conform to Naturalism, materialism, and uniformitarianism. Naturalism claims that God does nothing. Materialism claims that there is no God or spiritual realm. Uniformitarianism claims that there was not creation and that there was no violent worldwide flood, as the Bible and numerous other historical accounts record. Whatever they observe that does not conform to this complex filter is censored. The way that it is censored can take several forms. The ungodly may boldly proclaim that, though the data appears to support God's version and refute the version of the ungodly, yet it still must be interpreted to mean just the opposite of what it does mean. A backup method that ungodly people use is to prophecy that in the future, science will be able to explain what they see as an anomaly. If that fails, they will hide the data, set it aside, or lie to keep the public from knowing the truth. The data clearly demolishes the story of the ungodly and clearly supports the reality of the Creator God, His Bible, and His abiding Presence in His people. When confronted with the obvious, a closed-minded ungodly person says, "I can't understand it." They are willingly ignorant because they refuse to hold God in their knowledge. The reality is that these people, for whatever reason, don't what to know the Creator. They don't want to truly know Jesus, their Creator.
Astronomy
Bible, God, theology
Biology (creation vs evolution)
Creation: relevance to Christianity, society and science
Geology, the Flood, the Ice Age and the age of the earth
History
Paleontology
Author/Compiler Last updated: Jun, 2013 Bread Crumbs Main Foundations Home Meaning Bible Dictionary History Toons & Vids Quotations Similar
There Are Several Very Clear Reasons that Evolution Presents False Dogma and These Reasons Cannot Be Refuted. How Do We Know That Evolutionary Progress Has Never Been Observed? Evolution Is A Series Of Broken Arguments There Is No Evidence Of So-Called Evolutionary Links Between Kinds Of Living Things What Is The Basis Or Mechanism That Would Allow Evolutionism's Claims To Work? Breeding experiments have done much to debunk the evolutionary dogma. Complexity, Information, And The 2nd Law Of Thermodynamics Show Evolution To Be Impossible Nothing Creates Itself -- Ever! Evolutionists Make The Sanity-defying Claim That The First Strand Of DNA Arose By Natural Selection. Has anyone ever seen proof of evolution? Who Could Even Believe Such a Thing?! No One, Really. Some People Brainwash Themselves. There Are No Examples Of Continued Overall Increases In Complexity And Information Without Intelligence. What is the new type of scientific method that has been developed especially for evolution? Questions and Answers: What is the basis for your statement that no new genetic information is produced or created? Questions and Answers: What About the Kangaroo in Australia Only? Does That Prove Evolution? Recent
Home Answer to Critic Appeal to Possibility Circular Reasoning Argument to the Future Insignificant Cause Word Magic Love Between a Man and Woman Author/Compiler Colossians 2 Righteousness & Holiness Don't Compromise Sin Proof by Atheism Scriptures About Marriage Genuine Authority The Reason for Rejecting Truth Witness on the Internet Flaky Human Reasoning How Do You Know? Featured
The Real Purpose of the Church The Real Purpose of Life From Glory to Glory REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT How to be Led by God How to Witness Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality Holiness & Mind/Soul Redemption: Free From Sin Real Reality Stories Versus Revelation Understanding Logic Logical Fallacies Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty? How Can We Know Anything? God's Word God's Process God's Pattern Mind Designed to Relate to God Answers for the Confused Fossil Record Says: "Creation" Avoid These Pitfalls Public School's Religion Twisting Science Evolutionism Public School Failures Twisting History |
|