click here to learn more about being redeemed from sin and set free to serve God in spirit and in truth. click here to learn more about holiness click here to learn more about being changed into the same image click here to learn more about sowing and reaping click here to learn more about the free gift of righteousness. click here to learn more about how faith gives us access to grace and grace does the works. click here to learn more about faith and how it comes. click here to learn more about acknowledging Jesus click here to learn more about how God speaks Who will you listen to?  Click here to learn more. click here to learn more about the pattern of God. click here to learn more about the pattern of God for individuals, marriage, and family. click here to learn more about the pattern of God for the local church click here to learn more about the Church universal
SeekFind Logo            Home     >   Meaning     >   Christian Witness     >   Answers for Witness     >   Stories Versus Revelation     >   Creation, Flood, Etc.     >   Creation v. Evolution     >   Tactics     >   False Proof     >   Time Doesn't Help

Because Of The Second Law Of Thermodynamics, Time Doesn't Make Complexity More Likely.


If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.

Time Doesn't Help Evolutionism

Because of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, time doesn't make complexity more likely. Time actually makes complexity less likely. The Second Law of Thermodynamics tells us that molecules-to-man evolution is a scientific impossibility: Evolutionism does not fit those things we can easily observe. One of the most simple to understand scientific laws that eliminates the possibility of evolution is the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The Second Law of Thermodynamics, or the Law of Entropy says that all elements tend to disintegrate to a lower order of available energy or organization. A car, for example, does not get better and better; it deteriorates. A rock rolls down a hill, but not up it. Evolution is the claim that matter does just the opposite, that matter goes to ever higher levels of complexity and organization. If you would like to be an evolutionist, you must fool people into believing in this impossible, unworkable hypothesis?

Some pseudo-scientists argue against the Second Law of Thermodynamics, and the reason that they are wrong can be found here at Evolution isn't science.

"Remember this tendency from order to disorder applies to all real processes. Real processes include, of course, biological and geological processes, as well as chemical and physical processes. The interesting question is: "How does a real biological process, which goes from order to disorder, result in evolution, which goes from disorder to order?" Perhaps the evolutionist can ultimately find an answer to this question, but he at least should not ignore it, as most evolutionists do. Especially is such a question vital, when we are thinking of evolution as a growth process on the grand scale from atom to Adam and from particle to people. This represents an absolutely gigantic increase in order and complexity, and is clearly out of place altogether in the context of the Second Law."

The Evolutionists will tell you a half truth about the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The Evolutionists will tell the half truth: "The Second Law of Thermodynamics only applies to isolated systems, so it's not relevant to evolution, because the Earth is an open system." This is a clever lie. Here is the part of the truth that they are withholding: the Second Law of Thermodynamics was derived using theoretical isolated systems, but it applies to all systems, and can only be overcome locally and temporarily in open systems when stringent conditions are met. Not only that, but we are not talking about the Earth. The Earth is just a subsystem of a much larger system called the Universe. The Universe is an isolated system. Evolutionists claim that Evolution took place in this isolated system, but the Second Law of Thermodynamics tells us that their story is a myth.

More information on the Second Law of Thermodynamics can be found here & here & here & here & here

"Whence life complexity? Give evolutionists all the carbon-based molecules they want - will they get life to form and evolve? Will the amino acids form proteins (see online book) that can evolve into complex life? Michael Lynch and Ariel Fernandez, scientists at the University of Chicago, reported PhysOrg began with proteins, and then speculated that "Errors in protein structure sparked evolution of biological complexity." That's right: complex life is the result of mistakes. This idea was published in Nature.1 "... "This new idea is actually un-Darwinian. In a nutshell, PhysOrg said, "random introduction of errors into proteins, rather than traditional natural selection, may have boosted the evolution of biological complexity."  How can that be?  Is there any complex system that gets better with the introduction of random errors?"... "Help your local pre-creationist friend at the university become a full-fledged one. Give him or her the following books:

By the way, there is plenty of scientific evidence for a young Earth and a recent creation:

Depending on which definition you use, Natural Selection can be real.  It works to eliminate severe mutations.  Natural Selection can mean different things depending on the context in which it is used, though.  Some of those contexts actually try to transform Natural Selection into molecules-to-man Evolution.  They also try to confuse people into believing that small adaptations (calling this micro-evolution, which is a deceiving term.) add up to molecules-to-man Evolution.  At other times, Natural Selection is written about as if it were an intelligent all-powerful god that thinks things through and does them.  But Natural Selection as a description of the way that severe mutations result in the death of the mutated life form is real.  It can't add information and it appears that mutation never adds any information either.  At least, no one has ever been able to observe information being added despite many tax dollars trying to do so. Evolution has a troubling information problem. (Read the latest science on the subject: Without Excuse by Werner Gitt, a description of the scientific Laws of Universal Information. See also: Information Theory Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4. Here is another interesting article.) More is constantly being learned about information and about the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Evolutionists tend to hide in the weeds of the unknown with an argument from ignorance: "If you can't prove, by empirical science, that evolution is impossible, then it happened." By empirical science alone, we can only prove probabilities. The probabilities show the Big-Bang-Billions-of-Years-No-Flood-Molecules-to-Man story to be a bazaar hypothesis, a story that is so improbable that it should not be considered. However, empirical science is not a tool that can prove anything to be true or false absolutely. For absolute proof, we have revelation. God says that He created everything. He is the One Who enforces the laws of nature. He is the One Who will judge all of us in the end. We know that because we know Him presonally through the indwelling Presence of Jesus Christ and the moment-by-moment instruction of the Holy Spirit.

Atheists and dogmatic evolutionists will claim that information is added by mutation, by viral infections. However, viruses can only add existing information. They don't explain where the information came from. Most mutations aren't detrimental enough, however, for Natural Selection to operate, but mutations remove information. They don't add it. Small mutations can build up in a population over time and cause extinction.  It is illegitimate to use Natural Selection to support Evolution.  Natural Selection supports a young Earth and a Creator.

The latest science regarding the age of the Earth:

Last updated: Jun, 2013

Because Of The Second Law Of Thermodynamics, Time Doesn't Make Complexity More Likely.

Main Menu







Toons & Vids



There are 13 sub-topics of "False Proof"

What is the positive proof of evolution?

The Proof Of Evolutionism That Isn't There . . . Proves Evolutionism?

DNA is proof of creation. Evolutionists are in illogical denial of this obvious fact.

Has The HIV Virus Demonstrated Evolution In Any Way?

Are Super-Germs an Example of Evolution in Action?

Is Sickle-cell Anemia An Example Of Evolution In The Present Day?

Did E-Coli Evolve?

Is The Adaptation Of Bacteria To Feeding On Nylon Waste An Example Of Evolution?

Salt Crystals Are Not Strands Of DNA. A Strand Of DNA Is Not A Cell.

Evolutionists Claim That There Is Another Law That Works Exactly Opposite The Law Of Entropy

Evolution Is Impossible, But The Impossible Must Happen Over Huge Amounts Of Time

Because Of The Second Law Of Thermodynamics, Time Doesn't Make Complexity More Likely.

Claiming that Evolution is an Undeniable Fact of Science is Equivocation

Child Pages

Most Recently edited pages:

Answer to Critic

Appeal to Possibility

Circular Reasoning

Argument to the Future

Insignificant Cause

Word Magic

Love Between a Man and Woman


Colossians 2

Righteousness & Holiness

Don't Compromise


Proof by Atheism

Scriptures About Marriage

Genuine Authority

The Reason for Rejecting Truth

Witness on the Internet

Flaky Human Reasoning

How Do You Know?

15-minutes to Understand Logic

Featured Articles:

The Real Purpose of the Church

The Real Purpose of Life

From Glory to Glory

REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT

REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT

How to be Led by God

How to Witness

Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality

Holiness & Mind/Soul

Redemption: Free From Sin

Real Reality

Stories Versus Revelation

Understanding Logic

Logical Fallacies

Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty?

How Can We Know Anything?

God's Word

God's Process

God's Pattern

Mind Designed to Relate to God

Answers for the Confused

Fossil Record Says: "Creation"

Avoid These Pitfalls

Public School's Religion

Twisting Science


Public School Failures

Twisting History

Put a Link To This Page on Your Site.
HTML Code:

Links: ~ Because Of The Second Law Of Thermodynamics, Time Doesn't Make Complexity More Likely.
Because Of The Second Law Of Thermodynamics, Time Doesn't Make Complexity More Likely.

How can we know anything about anything? That's the real question

more info: mouseover or click

The complexity of Gods Way understood in a single diagram
Obey your flesh and descend into darkness