|Because Of The Second Law Of Thermodynamics, Time Doesn't Make Complexity More Likely.|
If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.
Time Doesn't Help Evolutionism
Because of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, time doesn't make complexity more likely. Time actually makes complexity less likely. The Second Law of Thermodynamics tells us that molecules-to-man evolution is a scientific impossibility: Evolutionism does not fit those things we can easily observe. One of the most simple to understand scientific laws that eliminates the possibility of evolution is the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The Second Law of Thermodynamics, or the Law of Entropy says that all elements tend to disintegrate to a lower order of available energy or organization. A car, for example, does not get better and better; it deteriorates. A rock rolls down a hill, but not up it. Evolution is the claim that matter does just the opposite, that matter goes to ever higher levels of complexity and organization. If you would like to be an evolutionist, you must fool people into believing in this impossible, unworkable hypothesis?
Some pseudo-scientists argue against the Second Law of Thermodynamics, and the reason that they are wrong can be found here at Evolution isn't science.
"Remember this tendency from order to disorder applies to all real processes. Real processes include, of course, biological and geological processes, as well as chemical and physical processes. The interesting question is: "How does a real biological process, which goes from order to disorder, result in evolution, which goes from disorder to order?" Perhaps the evolutionist can ultimately find an answer to this question, but he at least should not ignore it, as most evolutionists do. Especially is such a question vital, when we are thinking of evolution as a growth process on the grand scale from atom to Adam and from particle to people. This represents an absolutely gigantic increase in order and complexity, and is clearly out of place altogether in the context of the Second Law." http://www.icr.org/article/evolution-thermodynamics-entropy/
The Evolutionists will tell you a half truth about the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The Evolutionists will tell the half truth: "The Second Law of Thermodynamics only applies to isolated systems, so it's not relevant to evolution, because the Earth is an open system." This is a clever lie. Here is the part of the truth that they are withholding: the Second Law of Thermodynamics was derived using theoretical isolated systems, but it applies to all systems, and can only be overcome locally and temporarily in open systems when stringent conditions are met. Not only that, but we are not talking about the Earth. The Earth is just a subsystem of a much larger system called the Universe. The Universe is an isolated system. Evolutionists claim that Evolution took place in this isolated system, but the Second Law of Thermodynamics tells us that their story is a myth.
"Whence life complexity? Give evolutionists all the carbon-based molecules they want - will they get life to form and evolve? Will the amino acids form proteins (see online book) that can evolve into complex life? Michael Lynch and Ariel Fernandez, scientists at the University of Chicago, reported PhysOrg began with proteins, and then speculated that "Errors in protein structure sparked evolution of biological complexity." That's right: complex life is the result of mistakes. This idea was published in Nature.1 "... "This new idea is actually un-Darwinian. In a nutshell, PhysOrg said, "random introduction of errors into proteins, rather than traditional natural selection, may have boosted the evolution of biological complexity." How can that be? Is there any complex system that gets better with the introduction of random errors?"... "Help your local pre-creationist friend at the university become a full-fledged one. Give him or her the following books:
By the way, there is plenty of scientific evidence for a young Earth and a recent creation:
Depending on which definition you use, Natural Selection can be real. It works to eliminate severe mutations. Natural Selection can mean different things depending on the context in which it is used, though. Some of those contexts actually try to transform Natural Selection into molecules-to-man Evolution. They also try to confuse people into believing that small adaptations (calling this micro-evolution, which is a deceiving term.) add up to molecules-to-man Evolution. At other times, Natural Selection is written about as if it were an intelligent all-powerful god that thinks things through and does them. But Natural Selection as a description of the way that severe mutations result in the death of the mutated life form is real. It can't add information and it appears that mutation never adds any information either. At least, no one has ever been able to observe information being added despite many tax dollars trying to do so. Evolution has a troubling information problem. (Read the latest science on the subject: Without Excuse by Werner Gitt, a description of the scientific Laws of Universal Information. See also: Information Theory Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4. Here is another interesting article.) More is constantly being learned about information and about the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Evolutionists tend to hide in the weeds of the unknown with an argument from ignorance: "If you can't prove, by empirical science, that evolution is impossible, then it happened." By empirical science alone, we can only prove probabilities. The probabilities show the Big-Bang-Billions-of-Years-No-Flood-Molecules-to-Man story to be a bazaar hypothesis, a story that is so improbable that it should not be considered. However, empirical science is not a tool that can prove anything to be true or false absolutely. For absolute proof, we have revelation. God says that He created everything. He is the One Who enforces the laws of nature. He is the One Who will judge all of us in the end. We know that because we know Him presonally through the indwelling Presence of Jesus Christ and the moment-by-moment instruction of the Holy Spirit.
Atheists and dogmatic evolutionists will claim that information is added by mutation, by viral infections. However, viruses can only add existing information. They don't explain where the information came from. Most mutations aren't detrimental enough, however, for Natural Selection to operate, but mutations remove information. They don't add it. Small mutations can build up in a population over time and cause extinction. It is illegitimate to use Natural Selection to support Evolution. Natural Selection supports a young Earth and a Creator.
The latest science regarding the age of the Earth:
Last updated: Jun, 2013
Toons & Vids
What is the positive proof of evolution?
The Proof Of Evolutionism That Isn't There . . . Proves Evolutionism?
DNA is proof of creation. Evolutionists are in illogical denial of this obvious fact.
Has The HIV Virus Demonstrated Evolution In Any Way?
Are Super-Germs an Example of Evolution in Action?
Is Sickle-cell Anemia An Example Of Evolution In The Present Day?
Did E-Coli Evolve?
Is The Adaptation Of Bacteria To Feeding On Nylon Waste An Example Of Evolution?
Salt Crystals Are Not Strands Of DNA. A Strand Of DNA Is Not A Cell.
Evolutionists Claim That There Is Another Law That Works Exactly Opposite The Law Of Entropy
Evolution Is Impossible, But The Impossible Must Happen Over Huge Amounts Of Time
Because Of The Second Law Of Thermodynamics, Time Doesn't Make Complexity More Likely.
Claiming that Evolution is an Undeniable Fact of Science is Equivocation
Answer to Critic
Appeal to Possibility
Argument to the Future
Love Between a Man and Woman
Righteousness & Holiness
Proof by Atheism
Scriptures About Marriage
The Reason for Rejecting Truth
Witness on the Internet
Flaky Human Reasoning
How Do You Know?
The Real Purpose of the Church
The Real Purpose of Life
From Glory to Glory
REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT
REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT
How to be Led by God
How to Witness
Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality
Holiness & Mind/Soul
Redemption: Free From Sin
Stories Versus Revelation
Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty?
How Can We Know Anything?
Mind Designed to Relate to God
Answers for the Confused
Fossil Record Says: "Creation"
Avoid These Pitfalls
Public School's Religion
Public School Failures