The scientific observations regarding DNA have not helped the case of the evolutionists except to create a new area where they can get away with telling half truths because the public is not aware of the details of DNA research. Sometimes, evolutionists even claim that DNA evidence supports evolution, but it does not. Similarities between the DNA of two animals do not prove a common designer any more or less than those similarities would be able to prove evolution, though both arguments are presented.

Evolutionism is merely a story.  An expensive tax-supported story, but a story none the less.  Increasingly, it is an explanation to explain away what can be easily observed.  As evolutionist become aware of the complexity of the cell, they are forced to explain how all this complexity came into existance.

I was talking to an evolutionist who wanted to debate me.  There was no point in arguing with the man.  His mind was made up.  I just kept asking him why he believed what he believed.  When he would tell me, I would ask him why he believed that to be true.  He would give me an answer and I asked him why he thought that was true.  After about a half hour of this, he got a kind of glassy-eyed look and his answer was, "I guess I'm making the whole thing up."  Do you think that he dropped Evolutionism?  Not a chance.

Later, this same person challenged me, "You have to convince me that God exists."  I just looked away to Jesus, and then I answered, "I can't do that."  He said, "Why not?  You have to try to convince me."  I said, "How would I be able to change your mind when God has been speaking to you all along and you have ignored Him?"  You see, Evolutionism is metaphysical.  It does not respond to scientific evidence.  It does not respond to logic.  Information and organization are never added to anything by random chance.  That is a scientific fact.

How does order come from chaos?  How can something come from nothing?  How can randomness create intelligence?  If the universe always existed as some hypothesis, then why isn't it in heat death.  If the universe popped into existence from nothing, then what is the mechanism by which it popped.  If plants and animals evolved, there would need to be thousands of transitional forms between known kinds of animals and plants; where are they?  You can line up plants and animals according to similarity and claim that proves evolution; I can do the same with things I find in my garage; does that mean they evolved too?  If the first complex (they are all amazingly complex) cell popped into existence, by what mechanism did it pop?  If it came into existence slowly, what are the steps?  No one who looks at evolution with an open mind can accept it as a viable hypothesis.

Interestingly, the similarities in the genetic code are often contradictory to the evolutionistic interpretations of the fossil record.  Some evolutionists deal with this by presenting arguments for one part of their hypothesis that conflicts with the arguments for another part of their hypothesis.  They try to do this in a way that avoids detection of the inconsistencies.  When these inconsistencies are pointed out, the evolutionists use deception to try to rationalize the problem away.  You can read the latest from the scientific journals and see what I mean right here: http://www.creationsafaris.com/crev200812.htm