| Spontaneous Life |
|
If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.
Evolution Theory Depends on Spontaneous LifeJust as evolutionism's claim, that life evolved from species to species, its claim that life started by chance has been proven impossible. Evolution isn't science. Splitting Abiogenesis into a different compartment in the Evolutionist's mind does not get rid of the problem. Falsely reported research into creating spontaneous life in a test tube may fool the people who perform the news media show, but any person with a grain of intelligence should be able to see through the lie. Professors Sir Fred Hoyle, Astronomy at Cambridge University and Chandra Wickramasinghe, Applied Mathematics, University College, Cardiff, wrote in their book, Convergence to God in Evolution from Space: "The probability of life originating at random is so utterly minuscule as to make the random concept absurd..." Even if the universe is hundreds of billions of years old, it is still impossible. Abiogenesis Is a Huge Problem for Evolutionist Evolution is Just Story Telling Those who don't recieve revelation from God must base every thought on simple-minded assumptions. For ungodly people, their assumptions are filters and a way to censor out any information that supports the existence of God. They set up a web of rules to filter out God. They will only accept those things that conform to Naturalism, materialism, and uniformitarianism. Naturalism claims that there is no spiritual realm, so it includes Atheism. Materialism also claims that there is no spiritual realm and there is no God--redundant to Naturalism. Uniformitarianism claims that there was not creation and that there was no violent worldwide flood, as the Bible and numerous other historical accounts record. Whatever they observe that does not conform to this complex filter is censored. The way that it is censored can take several forms. The ungodly may boldly proclaim that, though the data appears to support God's version and refute the version of the ungodly, yet it still must be interpreted to mean just the opposite of what it does mean. A backup method that ungodly people use is to prophecy that in the future, science will be able to explain what they see as an anomaly. If that fails, they will hide the data, set it aside, or lie to keep the public from knowing the truth. The data clearly demolishes the story of the ungodly and clearly supports the reality of the Creator God, His Bible, and His abiding Presence in His people. When confronted with the obvious, a closed-minded ungodly person says, "I can't understand it." They are willingly ignorant because they refuse to hold God in their knowledge. The reality is that these people, for whatever reason, don't what to know the Creator. They don't want to truly know Jesus, their Creator.
How can we know anything about anything? That’s the real question |
Recently Viewed |