click here to learn more about being redeemed from sin and set free to serve God in spirit and in truth. click here to learn more about holiness click here to learn more about being changed into the same image click here to learn more about sowing and reaping click here to learn more about the free gift of righteousness. click here to learn more about how faith gives us access to grace and grace does the works. click here to learn more about faith and how it comes. click here to learn more about acknowledging Jesus click here to learn more about how God speaks Who will you listen to?  Click here to learn more. click here to learn more about the pattern of God. click here to learn more about the pattern of God for individuals, marriage, and family. click here to learn more about the pattern of God for the local church click here to learn more about the Church universal
 
SeekFind Logo Menu

Are we all descendants of fish or rocks?

 

Both materialistic evolutionary theory and theistic (God-controlled) evolutionary theory claim that we are all descendants of fish. "Of late, evolutionary family trees have been unraveling, and this comes as no surprise if macro-evolutionary theory is largely false." (read more) So, there are many new proposals of "trees of life" being developed, and these new trees conflict with the old tree of live. These new supposed trees of life are not working for Evolutionists, so the whole lineage is up for grabs. Lots of money to be made here for enterprising scientists with a strong imagination and story-telling ability. Just to verify that Evolutionists say that you are a decedent of a fish, go to this Evolution site, here, and you will see a picture of a fish with the caption, "my 195 millionth cousin. So, Both materialistic evolutionary stories and theistic (God-controlled) evolutionary stories claim that we are all descendants of fish, but who could believe such a message?

In general, Evolutionists will not use this terminology. They will not say, "we are all descendents of rocks." You won't hear them say, "we are descendant's of the fish." They will say something that sounds much more scientific or at least poetic, but having the same meaning. The trick is to make it scientific sounding enough to keep the grant money flowing.

Only someone who wants to avoid the real God.

It gets worse. Evolutionism teaches that we all came from rocks, violating known scientific laws to do so. Maybe here we should use the term, Darwinism, because Evolutionists play all kinds of games with the word, Evolution. (read more) Darwinism tries to tell a story of going from NO LIFE to LIFE. The method is very fuzzy. No one has ever been able to create life from non-life in a scientific experiment. (read more) (and more) Evolutionists can't even show a workable way that we could have evolved or that the first cell could have been formed. Evolutionists have stories--made-up stories that say the water dripped on rocks for millions of years and created a primordial soup, although they don't agree on what a primordial soup might be. It is a very fluffy and plastic story with many blank spaces and much that is undefined. Because Evolutionists have no compelling evidence, they have now just gone to loopy logic, emotional arguments, name-calling, coercion to control any other information leaking out, and declaring evolution to be a fact. If Evolutionists had a compelling story, they would not use such tactics.

"When evolution is seen as a storytelling game rather than a serious attempt at scientific explanation, it suddenly makes sense."

Someone may say, "Natural selection shows a truly plausible, elegant way, of how over billions of years, organisms have evolved to survive and propagate their genes through reproduction." If someone tells you this, ask them to define natural selection. They will not be able to tell you the specifics of how this would possibly create what is described in the stories of Darwinism. They will probably say that mutations adding information, but mutation has never been shown to add information to anything ever. If it were possible, the religious Atheists would certainly have done so. The governments of the Earth give them a fortune in funds to try to do so. Yet, they have been unsuccessful in showing any such thing. (Read the latest science on the subject: Without Excuse by Werner Gitt, a description of the scientific Laws of Universal Information. See also: Information Theory Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4. Here is another interesting article.) More is constantly being learned about information and about the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Evolutionists tend to hide in the weeds of the unknown with an argument from ignorance: "If you can't prove, by empirical science, that evolution is impossible, then it happened." By empirical science alone, we can only prove probabilities. The probabilities show the Big-Bang-Billions-of-Years-No-Flood-Molecules-to-Man story to be a bazaar hypothesis, a story that is so improbable that it should not be considered. However, empirical science is not a tool that can prove anything to be true or false absolutely. For absolute proof, we have revelation. (See Basic and Concise Guide to Practical, Useful Logic and Reasoning). God says that He created everything. He is the One Who enforces the laws of nature. He is the One Who will judge all of us in the end. We know that because we know Him presonally through the indwelling Presence of Jesus Christ and the moment-by-moment instruction of the Holy Spirit.

So they lie. They rationalize. They bring up examples that are in no way an addition of information. Since Evolutionism is a religious idea, that lack of science is no deterrent to the belief. If all else fail, they just start name calling. It is illegitimate to use Natural Selection to support Evolution. Natural Selection supports a young Earth and a Creator. There is no agreed-on definition of natural selection. And the name is very deceptive, as Darwin himself admitted. It should be Natural Elimination, since that is all that it does, and it doesn't to that very efficiently. The word, selection, implies an intelligence, because Darwin was trying to replace God. But there is no natural mechanism for intelligence in a materialistic worldview. We can observe a process of elimination of deformed living things. There is no process by which information could possibly be added to the cell. (read more) Evolution has a very real information problem.

Given the scientific facts that have been uncovered, a person would have to be willingly ignorant to believe such a thing. They would have to want very badly not to know about God's power and sovereignty, wouldn't they? They would have to just blind their eyes.

Someone may say: "With the evidence held, evolution is regarded as a fact within the scientific community, as much a fact as the heliocentric theory of the solar system and the theory of gravitation." And Evolutionist who would say such a thing does not understand the difference between observational science and forensic science. They may say, "Belief in God and creation do not represent the view of the scientific community at all." If an Evolutionist says such a thing to you, remind them that they are trying to use the logical fallacy known as "band wagon" to prove their point. Most scientists are members of the Atheistic religion, and most of them buy into Evolutionism. Of course, they have to. If they don't, knuckle under, they suffer extreme persecution. Message control stops good science regarding origins from happening. The fact that the majority of scientists believe in Darwinism does not prove a thing any more than the fact that any other group of people not believing in Darwinism could disprove Evolution. Make them stick with the facts rather than using loopy logic and emotional arguments.

You and I know that God created us and God knows that we know.

There is a lot that you and I know about God just by looking at the creation. The Bible is very clear that God speaks to you through the Bible, and not only through the Bible. In Paul's letter to the Romans, it says that everything that can be known about God, and the Godhead (including Jesus and the Holy Ghost), is known to you and I through the things that He has created. When you look at the creation around you, God speaks to you through your conscience. That's why you know right from wrong. That is why you know that you are helpless to save yourself from your own sin. Though your conscience can lose its sensitivity when you continually ignore it, it is still there, and God speaks to you through it. (some caveats about hearing God's Voice)

Only a fool would say in his heart there is no God.

God has made Himself very obvious in the things that He has created. And God knows that you know. He knows your thoughts even better than you do. You get confused with rationalized supposition and trying to hide your own sinful nature from others and from yourself. God is never confused. He is not impressed with phony arguments or human logic. It's between you and God, not anything else.

You can't fool God. No one can. He knows.
Romans 1:20
2 Peter 3
Psalm 94:9,10

Ungodly people live their lives by tightly held presuppositions--think of assumptions that were accepted as if they were facts. Of course, all assumptions are arbitrary. These presuppositions are filters and a way to censor out any information that supports the existence of God. They set up a web of rules to filter out God. They will only accept those things that conform to Naturalism, materialism, and uniformitarianism. Naturalism claims that God does nothing. Materialism claims that there is no God or spiritual realm. Uniformitarianism claims that there was not creation and that there was no violent worldwide flood, as the Bible and numerous other historical accounts record. Whatever they observe that does not conform to this complex filter is censored. The way that it is censored can take several forms. The ungodly may boldly proclaim that, though the data appears to support God's version and refute the version of the ungodly, yet it still must be interpreted to mean just the opposite of what it does mean. A backup method that ungodly people use is to prophecy that in the future, science will be able to explain what they see as an anomaly. If that fails, they will hide the data, set it aside, or lie to keep the public from knowing the truth. The data clearly demolishes the story of the ungodly and clearly supports the reality of the Creator God, His Bible, and His abiding Presence in His people. When confronted with the obvious, a closed-minded ungodly person says, "I can't understand it." They are willingly ignorant because they refuse to hold God in their knowledge. The reality is that these people, for whatever reason, don't what to know the Creator. They don't want to truly know Jesus, their Creator.

 



Author/Compiler
Last updated: Nov, 2011
 
 




Bread Crumbs

 
Home     >   Meaning     >   Christian Witness     >   Answers for Witness     >   Stories Versus Revelation     >   Creation, Flood, Etc.     >   Creation v. Evolution     >   Evolution is Flim-flam     >   The Wild Story     >   Flavius Josephus' View     >   Ancestors?

Main

Foundations

Home

Meaning

Bible

Dictionary

History

Toons & Vids

Quotations

Similar

God's Purpose Is To Have You Grow Up To Maturity.

Are some people actually ignorant on purpose?

Are we all descendants of fish or rocks?


Recent

Home

Answer to Critic

Appeal to Possibility

Circular Reasoning

Argument to the Future

Insignificant Cause

Word Magic

Love Between a Man and Woman

Author/Compiler

Colossians 2

Righteousness & Holiness

Don't Compromise

Sin

Proof by Atheism

Scriptures About Marriage

Genuine Authority

The Reason for Rejecting Truth

Witness on the Internet

Flaky Human Reasoning

How Do You Know?



Featured


The Real Purpose of the Church

The Real Purpose of Life

From Glory to Glory

REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT

REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT

How to be Led by God

How to Witness

Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality

Holiness & Mind/Soul

Redemption: Free From Sin

Real Reality

Stories Versus Revelation

Understanding Logic

Logical Fallacies

Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty?

How Can We Know Anything?

God's Word

God's Process

God's Pattern

Mind Designed to Relate to God

Answers for the Confused

Fossil Record Says: "Creation"

Avoid These Pitfalls

Public School's Religion

Twisting Science

Evolutionism

Public School Failures

Twisting History


How can we know anything about anything? That's the real question

more info: mouseover or click

The complexity of Gods Way understood in a single diagram
Obey your flesh and descend into darkness