The Humanist religion needs evolution. The atheist religion needs evolution. That's why the dogma of evolution is so religiously defended and promoted--regardless of fact. Evolution needs an old earth (although the hypothesis wouldn't even hold together if there were an infinitely old earth), while the Bible does not absolutely demand a young earth. In fact, it would take some wild assumptions to make an earth older than a few thousand years.  There is no scientific evidence for an old earth either.

Through speculation, coupled with many wild assumptions and illogical thinking, a person could reconcile the Bible and evolution. Speculation is, however, as silly for theologians as it is for scientists, although it is widely practiced by both groups. If someone were to speculatively rational-lies such an evolutionary premise, they would probably talk about some process directed by God. If God were doing it, of course, it wouldn't be evolution, would it? It would be slow creation. Slow creation would not be a big deal for a Christian--its just that the premise is just so unlikely; and there is no scientific evidence that in any way indicates that God did not create the world in six twenty-four hour days.

The idea of evolution is such an absurd hypothesis from a logical/scientific standpoint that random evolution could not be impossible. Why would anyone bother making up lies to try to rationalize such a speculation? Some of them might want to write a book to get royalties. Money talks. The world swings open the door for anyone who comes in the authority of their own self, but closes the door for those who come in the name of Jesus. When the world opens the door, it is an open door to making a lot of money from rationalized speculation.

An example of this money-hungry attitude: the reason scientists are pushing for using the stem cells of babies, thus killing the babies, is because this is where the money is. This type of stem cell research has proven to be not only unhelpful but also dangerous. The cells go wild and cause harm. The kind of stem cell research that is having success does not involve killing babies and presents no ethical or moral problems. Humanism is known for always looking for a section of the population to label as non-persons so that these people can be used as if they were property. Once it was the black population who were considered, by the evolutionists, to be “not evolved enough” to be persons. Now, the new group of non-persons is the preborn, yet, scientifically, we can observe that life begins at conception. These are people who desire life and feel pain.

And some people want God to be a god of forces, as in Daniel's prophecy and as in Star Wars, a god who doesn't care about their sin. They want to be able to do what they want to do . . . and not worry about God. Reality is so hard on some people.

More

Evolution isn't science.