click here to learn more about being redeemed from sin and set free to serve God in spirit and in truth. click here to learn more about holiness click here to learn more about being changed into the same image click here to learn more about sowing and reaping click here to learn more about the free gift of righteousness. click here to learn more about how faith gives us access to grace and grace does the works. click here to learn more about faith and how it comes. click here to learn more about acknowledging Jesus click here to learn more about how God speaks Who will you listen to?  Click here to learn more. click here to learn more about the pattern of God. click here to learn more about the pattern of God for individuals, marriage, and family. click here to learn more about the pattern of God for the local church click here to learn more about the Church universal
 
SeekFind Logo Menu

Logical Fallacy of Ad Hominem Ridicule

 

Logical Fallacy of Ad Hominem Ridicule

The Logical Fallacy of Ad Hominem Ridicule occurs when an appeal to ridicule fallacy is committed where the person is ridiculed rather than the idea. The appeal to ridicule fallacy occurs when ridicule or humor is used rather than rational thinking.

No one who has an actual reason for what they believe has any reason to use ad hominem ridicule. Ridicule is usually a way to cover for the fact that there is no basis for belief. All fallacies ar based on either infinite regress, circular reasoning, or axiomatic thinking. This problem of human thinking that destroys all possibility of sound reasoning in a secular mind is known as Agrippa's trilemma.

Examples of the Logical Fallacy of Ad Hominem Ridicule

Bill Nye arguing against Creation science:"Ken Ham and his followers have this remarkable view of a worldwide flood that somehow influenced everything that we see in nature. Five-hundred-foot wooden boat, eight zoo-keepers for 14,000 individual animals, every land plant in the world under water for a full year. I ask us all, is that really reasonable?"

There is no clearly stated conclusion, but there is innuendo, an implied conclusion. Consider what Bill might be trying to imply. He is probably trying to say that the Genesis Flood never happened. If the Flood never happened, then it would be difficult to say that God reveals through the Bible. When we hear this kind of claim that has such far-reaching consequences, we need to thoroughly sort through his arguments and any evidence presented to see if there is any truth to it.

At the same time, we know that God speaks to us through the Bible and that He is constantly showing us great and mighty things that we don’t know. For that reason, we know that Bill is wrong to imply that the Flood didn’t happen in the way the God tells us that it did. As you will see, Bill’s errors are very obvious. However, there may be a deception coming that is not so obvious. You must have a strong relationship with Christ so that you can discern between clever lies and truth.

In the words, "Ken Ham and his followers," Bill Nye is using the logical fallacy of the implied lie. It is a lie by innuendo instead of stating the lie clearly as:

Ken Ham and a small group of people believe the Bible as it is written. No one else in all the world believes what God says through the Bible. Ken Ham claims that the worldwide Flood moved the stars around and changed the laws of physics.

Stating it clearly would sound ridiculous and would be easily recognized as a straw man fallacy, so Bill uses innuendo. Then, if anyone questions Bill, innuendo gives him a built-in hedge, so he can claim that this is not what he meant.

Bill Nye is marginalizing and using a bandwagon fallacy. Bill makes Bible-believers sound like a strange group hiding out in the woods--almost dangerous. Why would Bill Nye use such verbiage?

Bill Nye is also using the ad hominem fallacy to try to portray Ken Ham as someone very weird, a sort of guru over a cult of followers. This was not a slip of the tongue but became a mantra of Bill Nye's throughout the debate. It is a tactic that works on some people just like bullying works on the playground. This is a kind of demonizing rather than dealing rationally with the subject at hand.

As a side note, according to recent polls, about 46 percent of Americans believed in Creation by God, 32 percent believed in Theistic Evolution and only 15 percent believed, as Bill Nye believes, in the Molecules-to-Man story without any Divine intervention. The creationists surveyed are largely productive contributors to society, and many are scientists in such fields as chemistry, physics, engineering, medicine, etc. (source) This only proves that Bill is telling an untruth. It doesn’t prove the Creation-Flood Model. The bandwagon fallacy can’t prove the Creation-Flood Model any more than this fallacy can prove the Big-Bang-Billions-of-Years-No-Flood-Molecules-to-Man story. It is only what has been revealed about the Creation-Flood Model that is proven and the fact that God says so is the proof. We ought to rejoice, though, that such a large portion of the population of the United States is resistant to brain-washing.

When Bill Nye says, this remarkable view of a worldwide flood that somehow influenced everything that we see in nature.” this is part of a complex fallacy. By mixing several fallacies, Bill is able to confuse his listeners. If what Bill says, “influenced everything that we see in nature,” were not a straw man fallacy, then it would truly be a remarkable view. In fact, the Big-Bang-Billions-of-Years-No-Flood-Molecules-to-Man story is a remarkable view, since it violates so many scientific laws. The idea that the Genesis Flood affected the entire world would be expected; however, it certainly didn’t influence everything that we see in nature.



Author/Compiler
Last updated: Sep, 2014
 
 




Bread Crumbs

 
Home     >   Meaning     >   Christian Witness     >   Encyclopedia of Logical Fallacies     >   Relevance Fallacies of the Source     >   Ad Hominem Ridicule

Main

Foundations

Home

Meaning

Bible

Dictionary

History

Toons & Vids

Quotations

Similar

Logical Fallacy of Ad Hominem

Logical Fallacy of Abusive Ad Hominem / Character Assassination / Smear Campaign / Throwing Stones

Logical Fallacy of Name Calling / Nominalization / Labeling / Nouning

Logical Fallacy of Creating Misgivings / Ad Fidentia

Logical Fallacy of Circumstantial Ad Hominem/Appeal to Motive/Appeal to Conflict of Interest/Appeal to Personal Interest/Argument from Motives/Questioning Motives/Appeal to Vested Interest

Logical Fallacy of Ad Hominem Ridicule

Logical Fallacy of Ad Hominem Tu Quoque

The Logical Fallacy of Demonizing

Logical Fallacy of Demagoguery

Logical Fallacy of Dehumanizing

Logical Fallacy of Argumentum Ad Fidentia

Logical Fallacy of Tu Quoque / You Too / Appeal to Hypocrisy / Personal Inconsistency (a form of ad hominem)

Hypocrisy Fallacy

Logical Fallacy of Origins / Genetic Fallacy / Fallacy of Virtue

Knights and Knaves Fallacy

Group Fallacy

Not Invented Here Fallacy

Corrupt Source Fallacy

Psychogenetic Fallacy

Logical Fallacy of Poisoning the Well / Discrediting

Logical Fallacy of Guilt by Association Ad Hominem / Bad Company Fallacy / The Company that You Keep Fallacy / Ex Concessis

Logical Fallacy of Appeal to Popular Pieties / Popular Prejudice / Appeal to What is Popular / Homily Ad Hominem (type of)


Recent

Home

Answer to Critic

Appeal to Possibility

Circular Reasoning

Argument to the Future

Insignificant Cause

Word Magic

Love Between a Man and Woman

Author/Compiler

Colossians 2

Righteousness & Holiness

Don't Compromise

Sin

Proof by Atheism

Scriptures About Marriage

Genuine Authority

The Reason for Rejecting Truth

Witness on the Internet

Flaky Human Reasoning

How Do You Know?



Featured


The Real Purpose of the Church

The Real Purpose of Life

From Glory to Glory

REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT

REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT

How to be Led by God

How to Witness

Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality

Holiness & Mind/Soul

Redemption: Free From Sin

Real Reality

Stories Versus Revelation

Understanding Logic

Logical Fallacies

Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty?

How Can We Know Anything?

God's Word

God's Process

God's Pattern

Mind Designed to Relate to God

Answers for the Confused

Fossil Record Says: "Creation"

Avoid These Pitfalls

Public School's Religion

Twisting Science

Evolutionism

Public School Failures

Twisting History


How can we know anything about anything? That's the real question

more info: mouseover or click

The complexity of Gods Way understood in a single diagram
Obey your flesh and descend into darkness