Logical Fallacy of Distinction Without a Difference / Phantom Distinction / Sham Distinctions |
Logical Fallacy of Distinction Without a Difference / Phantom Distinction / Sham DistinctionsDistinction without a difference is one of the many smokescreens that are used to cover the fact that the reasoning is based on one of the three fallacies of Agrippa's trilemma. Whenever a logical fallacy is committed, the fallacy has its roots in Agrippa's trilemma. All human thought (without Divine revelation) is based on one of three unhappy possibilities. These three possibilities are infinite regress, circular reasoning, or axiomatic thinking. This problem is known as Agrippa's trilemma. Some have claimed that only logic and math can be known without Divine revelation; however, that is not true. There is no reason to trust either logic or math without Divine revelation. Science is also limited to the pragmatic because of the weakness on human reasoning, which is known as Agrippa's trilemma. The logical fallacy of distinction without a difference / / Phantom Distinction / Sham Distinctions occurs when language is used to imply a difference between two things, and yet those two things are exactly the same. Examples of the Logical Fallacy of Distinction Without a Difference / Phantom Distinction / Sham Distinctions
The heart, here is not speaking of the body’s heart that pumps blood. This is speaking about the innermost mind. It is a term that we have adapted into language influenced by King James English. The same word that is translated from the Greek as heart is also translated as soul. Some people think that the soul is the spirit, but the spirit is another part of our spirit, soul, and body being. So, heart and soul is a bit redundant most of the time. At the same time, it appears that there is an innermost mind and a reasoning mind, the soul meaning the entire mind and the heart being the innermost part of the mind, so there is some distinction.
The problem here is that the word, naturalist, is simply a certain view of the atheist. Materialist is another view of the same atheistic concept.
Here, Bo is using this as an example of faulty comparison, saying that you can’t compare faith and science. He decides to define science as a method of knowledge and faith as a system of belief. However, faith is a method of knowledge, and science is a system of belief. In a recent, well-publicized debate, Bill Nye defined science as both a method of knowledge and a body of knowledge (system of belief). Faith, if we are talking about Christian faith, is a way to know. It works this way. God speaks. Faith comes as a free gift from God to believe what God just said. This is a method of knowledge. When human beings presume to fabricate knowledge (a function of Agrippa's Trilemma), then both science and faith fail. Bo contends that science is supposed to be a moving target but faith is not supposed to. He may have never read the Bible, because the God speaks through the Bible and reveals to us that we are to go from faith to faith and from glory to glory. We are supposed to be pressing toward the mark. He may have just seen the example of many lukewarm Christians who think that they are rich and increased of God and in need of nothing. There is no difference between faith and science. Both rest on Divine revelation if their reasoning is sound. There is no way to have sound reasoning if they do not. In fact, it is impossible to know anything scientifically without Divine revelation. God’s rain falls on the just and the unjust. God reveals through His Creation. He reveals much about Himself, and He says that those who refuse to acknowledge Him are without excuse. Fallacy Abuse
As with most fallacies, it is possible for us to become a bit judgmental and nit-picky, especially if we are full of pride because we just studied up on a little logic. This is an example of how a person with a lack of understanding may misuse logic to think of themselves in intellectually superior when they are not. Author/Compiler Last updated: Sep, 2014 Bread Crumbs Main Foundations Home Meaning Bible Dictionary History Toons & Vids Quotations Similar
Logical Fallacy of Faulty Comparison Incomplete Comparison Fallacy Inconsistent Comparison Fallacy Package Deal Fallacy The Logical Fallacy of Equating Opposites Ignoring Differences / Denying Differences / Overlooking Differences / False Equivalence / Ignoring Differences / Greyness Fallacy / False Equivalence Equating Opposites / Ignoring Differences: Logical Fallacy of False or Faulty Analogy / Weak Analogy / Bad Analogy / Appeal to the Moon Logical Fallacy of Extended Analogy Logical Fallacy of Projection Logical Fallacy of Reductio Ad Hitlerum / Ad Nazium / Hitler Card Logical Fallacy of Mistaken Identity Logical Fallacy of Distinction Without a Difference / Phantom Distinction / Sham Distinctions Recent
Home Answer to Critic Appeal to Possibility Circular Reasoning Argument to the Future Insignificant Cause Word Magic Love Between a Man and Woman Author/Compiler Colossians 2 Righteousness & Holiness Don't Compromise Sin Proof by Atheism Scriptures About Marriage Genuine Authority The Reason for Rejecting Truth Witness on the Internet Flaky Human Reasoning How Do You Know? Featured
The Real Purpose of the Church The Real Purpose of Life From Glory to Glory REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT How to be Led by God How to Witness Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality Holiness & Mind/Soul Redemption: Free From Sin Real Reality Stories Versus Revelation Understanding Logic Logical Fallacies Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty? How Can We Know Anything? God's Word God's Process God's Pattern Mind Designed to Relate to God Answers for the Confused Fossil Record Says: "Creation" Avoid These Pitfalls Public School's Religion Twisting Science Evolutionism Public School Failures Twisting History |
|