|Has anyone ever seen proof of evolution?|
If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.
No Scientific Evidence for Evolution-Just Stories
No one has ever seen evolution happen. We can see Natural Selection but it never adds information to anything which would have to happen if goo-to-you-by-way-of-the-zoo Evolution were to have happened. Natural Selection cannot possibly lead to molecules-to-man Evolution. We cannot even see anything like this in the fossils. Scientists agree that there should be many "transitional" forms that we could observe among the fossils if evolution had actually taken place. The fact is that there are no truly verified transitional forms--none. To the consternation of the evolutionists, what they find in the fossil record is a lot of variation within a certain kind of animal and then a huge gap between the next kind of animal with no truly verified transitional forms. This is so with every kind of animal. At any given time there are always a couple of instances of evolutionists having claimed to have found some transitional form, but these are always shown to be either frauds or errors within a short time. Evolutionists will sometimes say that one kind of animal is a transitional form between two other kinds of animals, but it is simply another kind and not a transitional form. Evolutionists will sometimes show many variations within a kind such as the horse kind of animal, but there are many variations of horses today, and there are many variations among most other kinds of animal alive today. Variations within the gene pool are not transitional forms. There are black people, white people, Indian people, Asian people and many variations within the kind, but all are people. There is only one race. Evolution makes an artificial difference. None is more evolved than the others as evolutionists have often claimed.
"What makes the question complex is that in place of the countless thousands of transitional forms expected (as Darwin rightly indicated should be found, and anticipated would be found in future), there exists at any point in time a handful of candidates, i.e. fossils put forward as transitional forms by evolutionary proponents. [Note: By 'transitional forms' is meant here fossils showing intermediate stages between major evolutionary transitions, i.e. from one kind of creature to a wholly different kind. For example, stages in the supposed transition of a walking reptile to a flying bird, nothing which creationists could regard as variation/speciation within a kind. Some evolutionists argue that we have countless thousands of transitional fossils, but they empty the term 'transitional fossil' of any content really meaningful for the creation-evolution debate. They define a fossil as 'transitional' in the same sense that a car is 'transitional' between a unicycle and a truck. That is not in view here.] Creationists by definition would argue that there are none, so to evolutionists this is seen as 'proof'. From a creation perspective, though, consider the following:" Go to http://creation.com/missing-links-parade for the rest of this article.
Open minded skeptics change their minds when they are actually able to investigate the facts. Dishonest Atheists and people who are closed-minded don't what their presuppositions to be challenged.
Depending on which definition you use, Natural Selection can be real. It works to eliminate severe mutations. If Evolutionists were not promoting a dogma, a more scientifically accurate term would be "natural elimination." Natural Selection can mean different things depending on the context in which it is used, though. Some of those contexts actually try to transform Natural Selection into molecules-to-man Evolution. They also try to confuse people into believing that small adaptations (calling this micro-evolution, which is a deceiving term.) add up to molecules-to-man Evolution. At other times, Natural Selection is written about as if it were an intelligent all-powerful god that thinks things through and does them. But Natural Selection as a description of the way that severe mutations result in the death of the mutated life form is real. It can't add information and it appears that mutation never adds any information either. We have no record of anyone ever being able to observe information being added despite many tax dollars trying to do so. (Read the latest science on the subject: Without Excuse by Werner Gitt, a description of the scientific Laws of Universal Information. See also: Information Theory Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4. Here is another interesting article.) More is constantly being learned about information and about the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Evolutionists tend to hide in the weeds of the unknown with an argument from ignorance: "If you can't prove, by empirical science, that evolution is impossible, then it happened." By empirical science alone, we can only prove probabilities. The probabilities show the Big-Bang-Billions-of-Years-No-Flood-Molecules-to-Man story to be a bazaar hypothesis, a story that is so improbable that it should not be considered. However, empirical science is not a tool that can prove anything to be true or false absolutely. For absolute proof, we have revelation. (See Basic and Concise Guide to Practical, Useful Logic and Reasoning). God says that He created everything. He is the One Who enforces the laws of nature. He is the One Who will judge all of us in the end. We know that because we know Him presonally through the indwelling Presence of Jesus Christ and the moment-by-moment instruction of the Holy Spirit.
Most mutations aren't detrimental enough, however, for Natural Selection to operate. Small mutations can build up in a population over time and cause extinction. It is illegitimate to use Natural Selection to support Evolution. Natural Selection supports a young Earth and a Creator. Evolution has a very real information problem.
Bible, God, theology
Biology (creation vs evolution)
Creation: relevance to Christianity, society and science
Geology, the Flood, the Ice Age and the age of the earth
Last updated: Jun, 2013
Toons & Vids
There Are Several Very Clear Reasons that Evolution Presents False Dogma and These Reasons Cannot Be Refuted.
How Do We Know That Evolutionary Progress Has Never Been Observed?
Evolution Is A Series Of Broken Arguments
There Is No Evidence Of So-Called Evolutionary Links Between Kinds Of Living Things
What Is The Basis Or Mechanism That Would Allow Evolutionism's Claims To Work?
Breeding experiments have done much to debunk the evolutionary dogma.
Complexity, Information, And The 2nd Law Of Thermodynamics Show Evolution To Be Impossible
Nothing Creates Itself -- Ever!
Evolutionists Make The Sanity-defying Claim That The First Strand Of DNA Arose By Natural Selection.
Has anyone ever seen proof of evolution?
Who Could Even Believe Such a Thing?! No One, Really. Some People Brainwash Themselves.
There Are No Examples Of Continued Overall Increases In Complexity And Information Without Intelligence.
What is the new type of scientific method that has been developed especially for evolution?
Questions and Answers: What is the basis for your statement that no new genetic information is produced or created?
Questions and Answers: What About the Kangaroo in Australia Only? Does That Prove Evolution?
Answer to Critic
Appeal to Possibility
Argument to the Future
Love Between a Man and Woman
Righteousness & Holiness
Proof by Atheism
Scriptures About Marriage
The Reason for Rejecting Truth
Witness on the Internet
Flaky Human Reasoning
How Do You Know?
The Real Purpose of the Church
The Real Purpose of Life
From Glory to Glory
REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT
REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT
How to be Led by God
How to Witness
Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality
Holiness & Mind/Soul
Redemption: Free From Sin
Stories Versus Revelation
Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty?
How Can We Know Anything?
Mind Designed to Relate to God
Answers for the Confused
Fossil Record Says: "Creation"
Avoid These Pitfalls
Public School's Religion
Public School Failures