|Questions and Answers: What is the basis for your statement that no new genetic information is produced or created?|
If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.
My question regards the creation of new 'information'. First is this 'genetic' information that is not produced? Are you saying that no new genetic information is ever produced by natural means?
Yes. We are saying that no new innovative genetic information of the type needed for even the smallest advance in so-called molecules-to-man evolution is ever produced by natural means--at least not that has ever been observed. Random processes appear to destroy information just as the scientific laws of information tell us. No evidence has come forward of any new genetic information ever being created by natural means. Mutations often result in changes to informaton, but information is lost or distorted, but no examples exist of genetic information being increased or created by natural means. It is illegitimate to use Natural Selection to support Evolution. Natural Selection supports a young Earth and a Creator.
(Read the latest science on the subject: Without Excuse by Werner Gitt, a description of the scientific Laws of Universal Information. See also: Information Theory Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4. Here is another interesting article.) More is constantly being learned about information and about the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Evolutionists tend to hide in the weeds of the unknown with an argument from ignorance: "If you can't prove, by empirical science, that evolution is impossible, then it happened." By empirical science alone, we can only prove probabilities. The probabilities show the Big-Bang-Billions-of-Years-No-Flood-Molecules-to-Man story to be a bazaar hypothesis, a story that is so improbable that it should not be considered. However, empirical science is not a tool that can prove anything to be true or false absolutely. For absolute proof, we have revelation. (See Basic and Concise Guide to Practical, Useful Logic and Reasoning). God says that He created everything. He is the One Who enforces the laws of nature. He is the One Who will judge all of us in the end. We know that because we know Him presonally through the indwelling Presence of Jesus Christ and the moment-by-moment instruction of the Holy Spirit.
The following chart makes it plain that every instance of supposed increase of information that is used by Evolution's evangelists is an example of NO increase in information. Evolutionist's claims for adding information fall into three categories. These are the 3 Rs of Evolution: Rearrange information, Remove information, and Ruin information. See: The 3 Rs of evolution
Using an analogy of a train, Evolution hopes to go from Missouri in Central U.S. to California. However, the train is going the wrong direction toward New York, with each small change being the result of a loss of information or simply a rearrangement of what is already there. The evolution train’s a-comin’
Second: Practically every pro-evolution site claims that evolution does produce new genetic information. So I would appreciate the basis for your statement that no new information is produced.
First, see the chart near the top of this page.
This may help. Read: Without Excuse by Werner Gitt, a description of the scientific Laws of Universal Information.
The basis for the statement that no new information is produced is plain in the frustrated Evolutionist quote below. There are many examples of claims by Evolutionists of proof of Evolutionism. Some of these false claims are the claims that "a new example exists that is evidence that mutations can generate an increase in information." Each time a claim is made, that claim must be tested by science. Observation and logic are applied. Since Evolutionists seem to be incapable of challenging any claim in favor of Evolutionism, it falls on the Creationists to apply science and see whether or not the claim is valid. To date, no claim has been valid. (Examples of false claims) It may be possible that a random event could actually add information, and it also may be possible that a random event could even add information that would be beneficial. The odds against this are very extreme. Even if an example were to be found, which has not happened, the finding of an example would not verify Evolution. We can see that the possibility of adding information is remote. The possibility of improving design by random process is insanely remote. The overall trend will always be downward. That is what science tells us. Every scientist knows this, but the social pressure and economic sanctions against any scientist who does not embrace and defend Evolutionism at all costs are so great that scientists tend not to even want to notice that their thinking is inconsistent and muddled. It is much more comfortable to just keep going with the flow.
In the same way, it is also possible that random events could add to the order and potential energy in one part of the universe. However, that would result in a reduction of order and potential energy in another part of the universe. The Second Law of Thermodynamics has never been refuted. No exception to this law has ever been shown. (Read More) The laws that regulate information apparently follow the same pattern as The Second Law of Thermodynamics.
The Evolutionists will tell you a half truth about the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The Evolutionists will put forth the half truth: "The Second Law of Thermodynamics only applies to isolated systems, so it's not relevant to evolution, because the Earth is an open system." This is a clever lie. Here is the part of the truth that they are withholding: the Second Law of Thermodynamics was derived using theoretical isolated systems, but it applies to all systems, and can only be overcome locally and temporarily in open systems when stringent conditions are met. Not only that, but we are not talking about the Earth. The Earth is just a subsystem of a much larger system called the Universe. The Universe is an isolated system. Evolutionists claim that Evolution took place in this isolated system, but the Second Law of Thermodynamics tells us that their story is a myth.
The following is quote of a lie that was given by an Evolutionist.
"No matter what example is offered as evidence that mutations can generate an increase in information, Creationists naturally have rationales for regarding that example as a case of loss of information. But every time Creationists "prove" another mutation to be an example of information loss, they add one more item to the list of biological changes which don't require a gain of information! If this pattern continues, Creationists will eventually "prove" that no biological change requires an increase in information; hence, they will have destroyed their own argument."
This evolutionist quote points out the difference between science and evolutionism. Let me re-phrase the quote to state the lie that is found in the quote more clearly:
There are many ways to pretend. One way is to say that Science = the molecules-to-man evolution conjecture / fabrication. Another is to claim that the molecules-to-man evolution conjecture / fabrication = Science. It is a conjecture, a fabrication. It isn't even a scientific theory. Other variations include claims that Biology depends on Evolution, or claims that Biology is Evolution, or claims that Evolution is Biology. These are not proof of anything but rather the placing of a label on something that is not based on observation and logic. That is not to say that observation and logic are the supreme way to knowledge. Such a statement would be scientism--another religion and a self-refuted religion at that.
Evolutionism is one of many cults invented by the enemy of the minds of humans. The enemy seeks to confuse and distract. He does not care by how much you miss the mark--just so you miss it. There is a meaning and purpose to life and it has nothing at all to do with Evolutionism. (Read More)
People who won't acknowledge God or listen to His Voice will only accept those things that conform to the arbitrary assumptions of Naturalism, materialism, and uniformitarianism. Then they claim that these arbitrary assumptions are facts. Naturalism claims that God does nothing and that there is no God. Materialism claims that there is no God or spiritual realm. Uniformitarianism claims that there was not creation and that there was no violent worldwide flood, as the Bible and numerous other historical accounts record. Whatever they observe that does not conform to this complex filter is censored. The way that it is censored can take several forms. The ungodly may boldly proclaim that, though the data appears to support God's version and refute the version of the ungodly, yet it still must be interpreted to mean just the opposite of what it does mean. A backup method that ungodly people use is to prophecy that in the future, science will be able to explain what they see as an anomaly. If that fails, they will hide the data, set it aside, or lie to keep the public from knowing the truth. The data clearly demolishes the story of the ungodly and clearly supports the reality of the Creator God, His Bible, and His abiding Presence in His people. When confronted with the obvious, a closed-minded ungodly person says, "I can't understand it." They are willingly ignorant because they refuse to hold God in their knowledge. The reality is that these people, for whatever reason, don't what to know the Creator. They don't want to truly know Jesus, their Creator.
Bible, God, theology
Biology (creation vs evolution)
Creation: relevance to Christianity, society and science
Geology, the Flood, the Ice Age and the age of the earth
Last updated: Nov, 2013
Toons & Vids
There Are Several Very Clear Reasons that Evolution Presents False Dogma and These Reasons Cannot Be Refuted.
How Do We Know That Evolutionary Progress Has Never Been Observed?
Evolution Is A Series Of Broken Arguments
There Is No Evidence Of So-Called Evolutionary Links Between Kinds Of Living Things
What Is The Basis Or Mechanism That Would Allow Evolutionism's Claims To Work?
Breeding experiments have done much to debunk the evolutionary dogma.
Complexity, Information, And The 2nd Law Of Thermodynamics Show Evolution To Be Impossible
Nothing Creates Itself -- Ever!
Evolutionists Make The Sanity-defying Claim That The First Strand Of DNA Arose By Natural Selection.
Has anyone ever seen proof of evolution?
Who Could Even Believe Such a Thing?! No One, Really. Some People Brainwash Themselves.
There Are No Examples Of Continued Overall Increases In Complexity And Information Without Intelligence.
What is the new type of scientific method that has been developed especially for evolution?
Questions and Answers: What is the basis for your statement that no new genetic information is produced or created?
Questions and Answers: What About the Kangaroo in Australia Only? Does That Prove Evolution?
Questions and Answers
Answer to Critic
Appeal to Possibility
Argument to the Future
Love Between a Man and Woman
Righteousness & Holiness
Proof by Atheism
Scriptures About Marriage
The Reason for Rejecting Truth
Witness on the Internet
Flaky Human Reasoning
How Do You Know?
The Real Purpose of the Church
The Real Purpose of Life
From Glory to Glory
REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT
REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT
How to be Led by God
How to Witness
Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality
Holiness & Mind/Soul
Redemption: Free From Sin
Stories Versus Revelation
Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty?
How Can We Know Anything?
Mind Designed to Relate to God
Answers for the Confused
Fossil Record Says: "Creation"
Avoid These Pitfalls
Public School's Religion
Public School Failures