click here to learn more about being redeemed from sin and set free to serve God in spirit and in truth. click here to learn more about holiness click here to learn more about being changed into the same image click here to learn more about sowing and reaping click here to learn more about the free gift of righteousness. click here to learn more about how faith gives us access to grace and grace does the works. click here to learn more about faith and how it comes. click here to learn more about acknowledging Jesus click here to learn more about how God speaks Who will you listen to?  Click here to learn more. click here to learn more about the pattern of God. click here to learn more about the pattern of God for individuals, marriage, and family. click here to learn more about the pattern of God for the local church click here to learn more about the Church universal
 
SeekFind Logo            Home     >   Meaning     >   Christian Witness     >   Answers for Witness     >   Stories Versus Revelation     >   Creation, Flood, Etc.     >   Creation v. Evolution     >   Whim Science
  

How could there be a science that is based on nothing but a whim?


 
 

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.

Whim Science

Evolution isn't science. Evolutionism is actually junk science or pseudo-science and is used to "prove" things like evolution, global warming and other environmentalist scare stories, the distortion of what God has reserved for marriage between a man and woman, and other stories to promote various forms of immorality, the idea that socialism can work, and many other harmful ideas. "When evolution is seen as a storytelling game rather than a serious attempt at scientific explanation, it suddenly makes sense." - See more at: http://crev.info/2013/11/evolutionary-stories/

Ungodly people are forced to hold on tightly to some basic presuppositions. These presuppositions are just simple-minded assumptions. They are filters and a way to censor out any information that supports the existence of God. They set up a web of rules to filter out God. They will only accept those things that conform to Naturalism, materialism, and uniformitarianism. Naturalism claims that God does nothing. Materialism claims that there is no God or spiritual realm. Uniformitarianism claims that there was not creation and that there was no violent worldwide flood, as the Bible and numerous other historical accounts record. Whatever they observe that does not conform to this complex filter is censored. The way that it is censored can take several forms. The ungodly may boldly proclaim that, though the data appears to support God's version and refute the version of the ungodly, yet it still must be interpreted to mean just the opposite of what it does mean. A backup method that ungodly people use is to prophecy that in the future, science will be able to explain what they see as an anomaly. If that fails, they will hide the data, set it aside, or lie to keep the public from knowing the truth. The data clearly demolishes the story of the ungodly and clearly supports the reality of the Creator God, His Bible, and His abiding Presence in His people. When confronted with the obvious, a closed-minded ungodly person says, "I can't understand it." They are willingly ignorant because they refuse to hold God in their knowledge. The reality is that these people, for whatever reason, don't what to know the Creator. They don't want to truly know Jesus, their Creator.

 

 

Astronomy

  1. Astronomy and Astrophysics (evidence for design, big bang problems, dark matter, seeing distant starlight)
  2. Solar System and Extra-solar planets Q&A (evidence for design, age, the Sun, planets, moons, comets, extra-solar planets)
  3. Aliens/UFOs (are extra-terrestrial aliens visiting us?)
  4. Galileo, geocentrism, and Joshua's long day

Bible, God, theology

  1. Bible (is it the Word of God? How are we to understand it?)
  2. Genesis (real history or mythology/polemic?)
  3. God (does God exist? what is He like?)
  4. Jesus Christ (the 'Son of God'? Why did He die? Resurrection?)
  5. Atheism, agnosticism and humanism: godless religions

Biology (creation vs evolution)

  1. Origin of life (origin of life theories critiqued, including life-from-space)
  2. Design features (dozens! ID, biomimetics, 'bad' design, astronomy, irreducible complexity)
  3. Natural selection (yes, it happens but it is not the same as evolution)
  4. Mutations (yes, they happen, but they can't change microbes into microbiologists)
  5. Speciation (yes, it happens, but it is limited to variation within the created kind)
  6. Genetics ('mitochondrial Eve', ape vs human DNA, gene duplication, genetic engineering, cloning, longevity of patriarchs)
  7. Information theory (including DNA) (information defined, claimed new information) Evolution has a troubling information problem.
  8. Probabilities (could life arise by chance? What about computer simulations of evolution?)
  9. Thermodynamics and order (how the laws of thermodynamics contradict Naturalism)
  10. Vestigial organs (including 'junk' DNA)
  11. Embryonic recapitulation and similarities (Haeckel's fraudulent concept, plus similarities due to common design)
  12. Charles Darwin (his religious views, contribution to human suffering, natural selection vs evolution)

Creation: relevance to Christianity, society and science

  1. Creation: Why It matters
  2. Death and suffering (Why? Origin of bad things such as poisons, carnivory, Satan)
  3. Creation compromises (theistic evolution, gap theory, progressive creation, framework, etc.)
  4. Apologetics defending the faith (proof & presuppositions, New Age, postmodernism, hell)
  5. Philosophy (logic and faith, proof of God, evolution and materialism)
  6. Countering the Critics (anti-creationists, 'bad' design, probability, 'proof' for an old earth)
  7. Bible 'contradictions' and 'errors' (answering attacks on the Bible)
  8. Communism and Nazism (the evolution connection)
  9. Science (what is it? Is creation or evolution science?)
  10. Arguments creationists should NOT use
  11. Creation Scientists (and other biographies)

Geology, the Flood, the Ice Age and the age of the Earth

The problem here is one of speculation. God forbids speculation. Think about the difference between dogmatic speculation and a lie. There is no difference. A lie is an abomination. Jobs counselors said many wise-sounding things, but God said that they had spoken things about Him that were not true. It makes no difference whether the speculations are made about the Bible, the Creation, or both, they are lies. God reveals to us what we need to know. Speculation just causes division. Since many have speculated that the Creation that we see around us is in conflict with the Bible, scientists who believe the Bible to be true have created models that show possible ways that the Creation could be explained by the Bible. These are models and are not to be taken dogmatically. Any projection about the age of the Earth that goes beyond what the Bible specifically says are speculations. In fact, all of the scientific ways of guessing the age of the Earth or the Universe are not even scientific but are based on circular reasoning. That means that to give any strong weight to them is to believe a made-up story, a lie. In the same way, the many stories of Evolution are made-up stories. They are not scientific and they conflict with the clear teachings of Scripture. They are speculations. God forbids speculation.

There is no physical evidence of a billions-of-years-old Earth. In fact, it is impossible to rationally put an age on the Earth from observation in the present. It is written in the Exodus 20:11 (in the Ten Commandments), "For in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but he rested on the seventh day. Therefore the LORD blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy." God has also revealed that the genealogies add up to about 6,000 years, and He has revealed this by speaking to us through Scripture. 

There are many stories that imply that there is a way that billions of years might be compatible with the Biblical account of history. However all of these stories, the day-age theory, the gap theory, and any others, are pure speculation. So there is no evidence, either in Scripture or in the Creation, for billions of years.

At the same time, it cannot be dogmatically stated that the Earth is about 6,000 years old. The reason for this is called the fallacy of the universal negative. You cannot possibly prove universal or absolute non-existence of anything unless God specifically reveals non-existence. God does reveal to us that "Indeed, there is no one on earth who is righteous, no one who does what is right and never sins." However, God has no such revelation that eliminates the possibility that there might be something that we don't know, that has no evidence that science can find, and that Scripture doesn't even hint at. If we are told that there is something that God has not told us about the age of the Earth, we can't absolutely deny it. Yet, since God didn't reveal it through Scripture, science, or any other means, we couldn't possibly believe such a claim. It is possible the God didn't tell us something. How would we know? Though the Bible and increasingly, scientific inquiry, seem to confirm a young Earth, it is possible that there is something that God chose not to reveal. Of course, this is kind of like the little man upon the stair who wasn't there. It's a bit of foolishness to consider it.

So, the age of the Earth appears, from a straight-forward reading of Scripture, to be about 6,000 years. All age-guessing methods using science are based on made-up stories and arbitrary assumptions. Circular reasoning is the main scientific method to cover up the irrationality of such age-of-the-Earth claims from science. Yet, we cannot dogmatically make claims about things that we cannot know. It is possible that God didn't tell us something, but why would we think about it then?

  1. Young Age Evidence (astronomy, botany, geology, fossils, caves, coal, glaciology, human history, oceanography)
  2. Radiometric Dating (radiometric dating problems, flaws, rapid decay? radiohalos)
  3. Flood (global? fish survival? Black Sea flood? flood legends).
  4. Noah s Ark (size, construction, stability, feasibility, care for animals, diseases, biogeography)
  5. Geology (Flood evidences, coal formation, limestone caves, rapid rocks, age of fossils?)
  6. Plate Tectonics (continental drift and catastrophic plate tectonics)
  7. Ice Age (post-Flood Ice Age, ice core dating, multiple Ice Ages? mammoths)

History

  1. Archaeology (archaeology and the Bible, from the Flood to New Testament times)
  2. History (including biblical chronology, genealogies, origin of deep time beliefs)
  3. Scopes Trial (What is the truth?)
  4. Linguistics (languages point to the Tower of Babel, animals talking?)

Paleontology

  1. Fossils (rapid formation, missing links, living fossils, dino-birds?, whale origins, tetrapods)
  2. Anthropology (human ancestry, alleged ape-men)
  3. Dinosaurs (humans coexist with? evidence against millions of years, birds from dinosaurs?
  4. Mammoths (how they fit with the post-Flood Ice Age)

Geology also shows creation and a worldwide catastrophic flood. Watch this video:



Author/Compiler
Last updated: Jun, 2013
 
 

How could there be a science that is based on nothing but a whim?



Main Menu

Foundations

Home

Meaning

Bible

Dictionary

History

Toons & Vids

Quotations

Sitemap



There are 29 sub-topics of "Science: Creation NOT Evolution"

Is Creation science or religion? Is Evolution science or religion?

Evolution Berkeley: Evolution 101

Claim: Evolution Has Been Observed!!! Really????

Ask them for Proof that Molecules-To-Man Evolution Actually Happened

Arguments Against Evolution

Twelve Arguments Evolutionists Should Avoid

The Most Amazing Thing That I Found Out About What The Schools Are Calling

The Problems with Evolution: What are the Problems with the Molecules-to-Man Evolution Fabrication

Unanswered Evolution Questions

Evolutionists Refuse To Follow The Evidence Where The Evidence Leads Because The Evidence Leads To God.

Ptolemy's Geocentric System of the Universe and Evolution

Can You Show Evidence For Creation By Almighty God From Nothing

Is the Creator Obvious? Stare at this picture for 60 seconds. A giraffe will appear.

Natural Selection And Mutation

Evolution is Flim-flam

Evolution Obviously Violates The Revealed Word Of God

What Is Wrong With Theistic Evolution?

Unproven And Unbelievable Evolution

Does the Founder Principle Support Evolution?

Birds to Dinosaurs?

Claim: Evolutionists Claim That Similar Features In Fossilized Skeletons Prove Evolution. Question: Is There Any Truth To This Claim?

If you explain that everything exists because God created it, you still have not explained anything.

The Cult, Evolutionism

Answers: Natural Selection and Mutation

Evolutionist Tactics Raise Serious Questions

How could there be a science that is based on nothing but a whim?

Why should evolutionism be called a fairytale rather than a theory?

Question & Answer: Butterfly Evolves Mouth for Bananas?

Links And Technical Information

Child Pages

Is There Something That Is Being Called Science, That Is Not Real Science?

Why Do Evolutionists Embellish Facts?

What Is the Driving Force Behind Evolutionistic Zeal?

Most Recently edited pages:

Answer to Critic

Appeal to Possibility

Circular Reasoning

Argument to the Future

Insignificant Cause

Word Magic

Love Between a Man and Woman

Author/Compiler

Colossians 2

Righteousness & Holiness

Don't Compromise

Sin

Proof by Atheism

Scriptures About Marriage

Genuine Authority

The Reason for Rejecting Truth

Witness on the Internet

Flaky Human Reasoning

How Do You Know?

15-minutes to Understand Logic




Featured Articles:


The Real Purpose of the Church

The Real Purpose of Life

From Glory to Glory

REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT

REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT

How to be Led by God

How to Witness

Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality

Holiness & Mind/Soul

Redemption: Free From Sin

Real Reality

Stories Versus Revelation

Understanding Logic

Logical Fallacies

Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty?

How Can We Know Anything?

God's Word

God's Process

God's Pattern

Mind Designed to Relate to God

Answers for the Confused

Fossil Record Says: "Creation"

Avoid These Pitfalls

Public School's Religion

Twisting Science

Evolutionism

Public School Failures

Twisting History


Put a Link To This Page on Your Site.
HTML Code:


Links:
SeekFind.net ~ How could there be a science that is based on nothing but a whim?
How could there be a science that is based on nothing but a whim?


How can we know anything about anything? That's the real question

more info: mouseover or click

The complexity of Gods Way understood in a single diagram
Obey your flesh and descend into darkness