| Follow the Evidence |
|
If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.
The Myth of Following the Evidence Where It LeadsFirst, we must say that evidence does not lead. Evidence doesn't talk. Evidence must be interpreted. Evolutionists claim that they will follow the evidence wherever it leads. This, of course, is a lie. Evolutionism conflicts with the evidence, yet Evolutionists will not accept the obvious evidence: God created the heavens and the earth. But Evolutionists hate God so they must hate truth. The alternative, to them, is unthinkable. The proponents of Evolutionism proclaim the Evolutionistic decree that even though everything looks like it was designed for a purpose, still we must repeat to ourselves, "This is not designed." They have decreed that they will not follow the evidence to where it points, because they don't like the place that the evidence goes. They don't want the almighty, all knowing, God who has everything under His control to exist. Professors in classrooms tell their student to keep repeating this lie. Evolutionists enforce the lie with coercion of many types. Evolution science and Creation science are both forensic sciences, just as crime scene investigation or fire investigation are both forensic sciences. Suppose that someone wrote a law that restricted a CSI from coming to the conclusion that anyone was murdered. Suppose that CSI looked at a crime scene and said, "All the evidence points to murder, but it cannot be murder, therefore it is not murder." Suppose a fire inspector looks at the scene of a fire and says that that the evidence points to arson, but we cannot conclude that arson has occurred since we are not allowed to do so? Is that science? How many changes must take place for survival to go from one type of living thing to another living thing? This number of changes would be different for every type of transition. There should be tens of thousands of transitions between every pair of similar kinds of animals. What we find is variations within kinds of animals. We see adaptations. We see mutations, diseases, and sicknesses. What we don't see is transitional forms. We see evolutionists presenting an endless parade of so-called "transitional forms" which are shown to be obvious fakes at a later time. By that time, the evolutionists have found more fakes to present, so at any time, there are fakes, a handful, that are under consideration. None of the mud that the evolutionists throw against the wall will stick, however. Once in a while, a new kind of animal has been found. Because you can line up any grouping of objects according to structural similarity, the Evolutionists will stick the new kind of animal between two other kinds of animals and declare it to be a transitional form. There are no fossils that even the Evolutionists with all their confirmation bias could possibly claim as unequivocal transitional forms. This is a problem because, were Evolutionism to hold any validity, there should be millions of transitional forms. There should be tens of thousands of transitional forms between each type of animal. When Gould recognized that there is no evidence for evolution in the fossil record, Gould created the theory of punctuated equilibrium based on the lack of evidence. There is no evidence for punctuated equilibrium. Gould recognized that punctuated equilibrium is only a creative story, but he declares his creative story to be science. Gould's theory is supported by the lack of evidence in the fossil record. How can any scientists say that they know that this theory has no evidence and they know this it is absolutely impossible... yet it must be true. That is insanity. "Being confined to a tiny cell is the depressing reality that makes prison awful. But even worse is when a mind is so straitjacketed by the atheistic philosophy of Naturalism that it eagerly believes explanations that are resisted by scientific observations. Claiming that the purpose of an eagle's wing cannot be known and that the synchronized movement of all its precisely fitted parts is only an "illusion of design" is a perception contrary to real external stimuli. How much better could scientists-set free to conclude design when they see design-approach research when released from misconceptions that flow from invalid, yet firmly held, reasoning constricted by Naturalism?" https://creationrevolution.com/2011/02/evaluating-real-vs-apparent-design/ "According to Romans 1, nature's design is so clear, so obvious, and so understandable that people of all ages in all cultures can easily see the Lord's "eternal power and Godhead." The one who actively suppresses this truth becomes a God-denier, an act that leaves him "without excuse." Romans 1:19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God has showed it to them. 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: You see? You know because God has showed it to you and to all of us. The Bible adds another valuable insight that is useful in any conversation about the origin of nature's design. Truth suppressors who profess themselves to be wise actually become fools. One certain reality is that evolutionary explanations of nature's design will invariably be foolish-they cannot escape this-and everyone else just needs to be mindful to look." https://creationrevolution.com/2010/12/the-folly-of-design-without-purpose/ "Although life looks superbly designed, Atheists and evolutionary biologists claim its apparent design is just an illusion. They have faith that mindless moving atoms and molecules acted on by blind physical constraints somehow "evolve" into life so complex that even humans can't imagine how to make it. Given the faith that life comes from matter rather than mind, the Atheist rejects the "wisdom of God" about the nature of life and how it should be lived." https://creationrevolution.com/2011/01/atheism-a-stealth-religion/
Open minded skeptics change their minds when they are actually able to investigate the facts. Dishonest Atheists and people who are closed-minded don't what their presuppositions to be challenged. Astronomy
Bible, God, theology
Biology (creation vs evolution)
Creation: relevance to Christianity, society and science
Geology, the Flood, the Ice Age and the age of the earth
History
Paleontology
How can we know anything about anything? That’s the real question |
Other Pages in this sectionWhich Is Science: Creation or Evolution? Berkeley: Evolution 101 Evolution Observed?? Ask for Proof of Evolution Arguments Against Evolution 12 Arguments Evolutionists Should Avoid Fake Science The Problems with Evolution Unanswered Evolution Questions Ptolemy & Evolution Evidence for Creation The Creator IS Obvious Natural Selection and Mutation Evolution is Flim-flam Evolutionism is Anti-Bible Theistic Evolution Unproven Evolution The Founder Principle Birds to Dinos Similarities Prove Evolution? God Created Explains Nothing? The Cult, Evolutionism Natural Selection & Mutation Tactics Whim Science SSWAAFT Question & Answer: Butterfly Evolution? Links Recently Viewed |
