If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.

The Myth of Following the Evidence Where It Leads

First, we must say that evidence does not lead. Evidence doesn't talk. Evidence must be interpreted.

Evolutionists claim that they will follow the evidence wherever it leads. This, of course, is a lie. Evolutionism conflicts with the evidence, yet Evolutionists will not accept the obvious evidence: God created the heavens and the earth. But Evolutionists hate God so they must hate truth. The alternative, to them, is unthinkable.

The proponents of Evolutionism proclaim the Evolutionistic decree that even though everything looks like it was designed for a purpose, still we must repeat to ourselves, "This is not designed." They have decreed that they will not follow the evidence to where it points, because they don't like the place that the evidence goes. They don't want the almighty, all knowing, God who has everything under His control to exist. Professors in classrooms tell their student to keep repeating this lie. Evolutionists enforce the lie with coercion of many types. Evolution science and Creation science are both forensic sciences, just as crime scene investigation or fire investigation are both forensic sciences. Suppose that someone wrote a law that restricted a CSI from coming to the conclusion that anyone was murdered. Suppose that CSI looked at a crime scene and said, "All the evidence points to murder, but it cannot be murder, therefore it is not murder." Suppose a fire inspector looks at the scene of a fire and says that that the evidence points to arson, but we cannot conclude that arson has occurred since we are not allowed to do so? Is that science?

How many changes must take place for survival to go from one type of living thing to another living thing? This number of changes would be different for every type of transition. There should be tens of thousands of transitions between every pair of similar kinds of animals.

What we find is variations within kinds of animals. We see adaptations. We see mutations, diseases, and sicknesses. What we don't see is transitional forms. We see evolutionists presenting an endless parade of so-called "transitional forms" which are shown to be obvious fakes at a later time. By that time, the evolutionists have found more fakes to present, so at any time, there are fakes, a handful, that are under consideration. None of the mud that the evolutionists throw against the wall will stick, however.

Once in a while, a new kind of animal has been found. Because you can line up any grouping of objects according to structural similarity, the Evolutionists will stick the new kind of animal between two other kinds of animals and declare it to be a transitional form. There are no fossils that even the Evolutionists with all their confirmation bias could possibly claim as unequivocal transitional forms. This is a problem because, were Evolutionism to hold any validity, there should be millions of transitional forms. There should be tens of thousands of transitional forms between each type of animal.

When Gould recognized that there is no evidence for evolution in the fossil record, Gould created the theory of punctuated equilibrium based on the lack of evidence. There is no evidence for punctuated equilibrium. Gould recognized that punctuated equilibrium is only a creative story, but he declares his creative story to be science. Gould's theory is supported by the lack of evidence in the fossil record. How can any scientists say that they know that this theory has no evidence and they know this it is absolutely impossible... yet it must be true. That is insanity.

"Being confined to a tiny cell is the depressing reality that makes prison awful. But even worse is when a mind is so straitjacketed by the atheistic philosophy of Naturalism that it eagerly believes explanations that are resisted by scientific observations. Claiming that the purpose of an eagle's wing cannot be known and that the synchronized movement of all its precisely fitted parts is only an "illusion of design" is a perception contrary to real external stimuli. How much better could scientists-set free to conclude design when they see design-approach research when released from misconceptions that flow from invalid, yet firmly held, reasoning constricted by Naturalism?" http://creationrevolution.com/2011/02/evaluating-real-vs-apparent-design/

"According to Romans 1, nature's design is so clear, so obvious, and so understandable that people of all ages in all cultures can easily see the Lord's "eternal power and Godhead." The one who actively suppresses this truth becomes a God-denier, an act that leaves him "without excuse."

Romans 1:19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God has showed it to them. 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: You see? You know because God has showed it to you and to all of us.

The Bible adds another valuable insight that is useful in any conversation about the origin of nature's design. Truth suppressors who profess themselves to be wise actually become fools. One certain reality is that evolutionary explanations of nature's design will invariably be foolish-they cannot escape this-and everyone else just needs to be mindful to look." http://creationrevolution.com/2010/12/the-folly-of-design-without-purpose/

"Although life looks superbly designed, Atheists and evolutionary biologists claim its apparent design is just an illusion. They have faith that mindless moving atoms and molecules acted on by blind physical constraints somehow "evolve" into life so complex that even humans can't imagine how to make it. Given the faith that life comes from matter rather than mind, the Atheist rejects the "wisdom of God" about the nature of life and how it should be lived." http://creationrevolution.com/2011/01/atheism-a-stealth-religion/

• Fifteen Questions for Evolutionists
• Fifteen Questions for Evolutionists: Responses 1
• Fifteen Questions for Evolutionists: Responses 2

Open minded skeptics change their minds when they are actually able to investigate the facts.  Dishonest Atheists and people who are closed-minded don't what their presuppositions to be challenged.

Astronomy

• Astronomy and Astrophysics (evidence for design, big bang problems, dark matter, seeing distant starlight)
• Solar System and Extra-solar planets Q&A (evidence for design, age, the Sun, planets, moons, comets, extra-solar planets)
• Aliens/UFOs (are extra-terrestrial aliens visiting us?)
• Galileo, geocentrism, and Joshua's long day

Bible, God, theology

• Bible (is it the Word of God? How are we to understand it?)
• Genesis (real history or mythology/polemic?)
• God (does God exist? what is He like?)
• Jesus Christ (the 'Son of God'? Why did He die? Resurrection?)
• Atheism, agnosticism and humanism: godless religions

Biology (creation vs evolution)

• Origin of life (origin of life theories critiqued, including life-from-space)
• Design features (dozens! ID, biomimetics, 'bad' design, astronomy, irreducible complexity)
• Natural selection (yes, it happens but it is not the same as evolution)
• Mutations (yes, they happen, but they can't change microbes into microbiologists)
• Speciation (yes, it happens, but it is limited to variation within the created kind)
• Genetics ('mitochondrial Eve', ape vs human DNA, gene duplication, genetic engineering, cloning, longevity of patriarchs)
• Information theory (including DNA) (information defined, claimed new information)
• Probabilities (could life arise by chance? What about computer simulations of evolution?)
• Thermodynamics and order (how the laws of thermodynamics contradict Naturalism)
• Vestigial organs (including 'junk' DNA)
• Embryonic recapitulation and similarities (Haeckel's fraudulent concept, plus similarities due to common design)
• Charles Darwin (his religious views, contribution to human suffering, natural selection vs evolution)

Creation: relevance to Christianity, society and science

• Creation: Why It matters
• Death and suffering (Why? Origin of bad things such as poisons, carnivory, Satan)
• Creation compromises (theistic evolution, gap theory, progressive creation, framework, etc.)
• Apologetics defending the faith (proof & presuppositions, New Age, postmodernism, hell)
• Philosophy (logic and faith, proof of God, evolution and materialism)
• Countering the Critics (anti-creationists, 'bad' design, probability, 'proof' for an old earth)
• Bible 'contradictions' and 'errors' (answering attacks on the Bible)
• Communism and Nazism (the evolution connection)
• Science (what is it? Is creation or evolution science?)
• Arguments creationists should NOT use
• Creation Scientists (and other biographies)

Geology, the Flood, the Ice Age and the age of the earth

• Young Age Evidence (astronomy, botany, geology, fossils, caves, coal, glaciology, human history, oceanography)
• Radiometric Dating (radiometric dating problems, flaws, rapid decay? radiohalos)
• Flood (global? fish survival? Black Sea flood? flood legends).
• Noah s Ark (size, construction, stability, feasibility, care for animals, diseases, biogeography)
• Geology (Flood evidences, coal formation, limestone caves, rapid rocks, age of fossils?)
• Plate Tectonics (continental drift and catastrophic plate tectonics)
• Ice Age (post-Flood Ice Age, ice core dating, multiple Ice Ages? mammoths)

History

• Archaeology (archaeology and the Bible, from the Flood to New Testament times)
• History (including biblical chronology, genealogies, origin of deep time beliefs)
• Scopes Trial (What is the truth?)
• Linguistics (languages point to the Tower of Babel, animals talking?)

Paleontology

• Fossils (rapid formation, missing links, living fossils, dino-birds?, whale origins, tetrapods)
• Anthropology (human ancestry, alleged ape-men)
• Dinosaurs (humans coexist with? evidence against millions of years, birds from dinosaurs?
• Mammoths (how they fit with the post-Flood Ice Age)