If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.

You may hear the question: How could 8 white people on the ark somehow create races of Negro, Indian, Asian, Hispanic, etc.?

Not everyone will stick in the word, "white," but we left it in this question just as it came from a skeptic to us.  Where did the "white people" idea come from?  Where does someone get that idea?  It is purely hidden into the sentence to confuse the issue.  By revelation, we know the flood took place and all people proceeded from those eight people.  Given this, it makes sense to assume that all the information and capability was there in those eight people that was necessary for producing all the skin tones we know today.  We know from scientific inquiry that no information is ever added to anything by random chance, so there is no naturalistic way that this information could have been added had it ever been lost.  This also means that this information could never have been added by any supposed evolutionary process.

It is known that a single man and woman with light brown skin could theoretically produce every skin tone in one generation.

In any attempt to disprove anything by scientific method, it is necessary to prove that there is no set of assumptions under which the thing to be disproved would be possible.  Clearly every attempt to disprove the accuracy of the Bible has always failed.

Revelation is different.  God says something to us.  We believe Him.  By this, we can know that Darwin's story is a hoax.

Watch this very short video.  It is excellent, accurate, and informative.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/media?s=races#/

Ungodly people are forced to hold on tightly to some basic presuppositions.  These presuppositions are just simple-minded assumptions.  They are filters and a way to censor out any information that supports the existence of God.  They set up a web of rules to filter out God.  They will only accept those things that conform to Naturalism, materialism, and uniformitarianism.  Naturalism claims that God does nothing.  Materialism claims that there is no God or spiritual realm.  Uniformitarianism claims that there was not creation and that there was no violent worldwide flood, as the Bible and numerous other historical accounts record.  Whatever they observe that does not conform to this complex filter is censored.  The way that it is censored can take several forms.  The ungodly may boldly proclaim that, though the data appears to support God's version and refute the version of the ungodly, yet it still must be interpreted to mean just the opposite of what it does mean.  A backup method that ungodly people use is to prophecy that in the future, science will be able to explain what they see as an anomaly.  If that fails, they will hide the data, set it aside, or lie to keep the public from knowing the truth.  The data clearly demolishes the story of the ungodly and clearly supports the reality of the Creator God, His Bible, and His abiding Presence in His people.  When confronted with the obvious, a closed-minded ungodly person says, "I can't understand it."  They are willingly ignorant because they refuse to hold God in their knowledge.  The reality is that these people, for whatever reason, don't what to know the Creator.  They don't want to truly know Jesus, their Creator.