|Logical Fallacy of Ad Hominem Ridicule|
Logical Fallacy of Ad Hominem Ridicule
The Logical Fallacy of Ad Hominem Ridicule occurs when an appeal to ridicule fallacy is committed where the person is ridiculed rather than the idea. The appeal to ridicule fallacy occurs when ridicule or humor is used rather than rational thinking.
No one who has an actual reason for what they believe has any reason to use ad hominem ridicule. Ridicule is usually a way to cover for the fact that there is no basis for belief. All fallacies ar based on either infinite regress, circular reasoning, or axiomatic thinking. This problem of human thinking that destroys all possibility of sound reasoning in a secular mind is known as Agrippa's trilemma.
Examples of the Logical Fallacy of Ad Hominem Ridicule
There is no clearly stated conclusion, but there is innuendo, an implied conclusion. Consider what Bill might be trying to imply. He is probably trying to say that the Genesis Flood never happened. If the Flood never happened, then it would be difficult to say that God reveals through the Bible. When we hear this kind of claim that has such far-reaching consequences, we need to thoroughly sort through his arguments and any evidence presented to see if there is any truth to it.
At the same time, we know that God speaks to us through the Bible and that He is constantly showing us great and mighty things that we don’t know. For that reason, we know that Bill is wrong to imply that the Flood didn’t happen in the way the God tells us that it did. As you will see, Bill’s errors are very obvious. However, there may be a deception coming that is not so obvious. You must have a strong relationship with Christ so that you can discern between clever lies and truth.
Ken Ham and a small group of people believe the Bible as it is written. No one else in all the world believes what God says through the Bible. Ken Ham claims that the worldwide Flood moved the stars around and changed the laws of physics.
Stating it clearly would sound ridiculous and would be easily recognized as a straw man fallacy, so Bill uses innuendo. Then, if anyone questions Bill, innuendo gives him a built-in hedge, so he can claim that this is not what he meant.
Bill Nye is also using the ad hominem fallacy to try to portray Ken Ham as someone very weird, a sort of guru over a cult of followers. This was not a slip of the tongue but became a mantra of Bill Nye's throughout the debate. It is a tactic that works on some people just like bullying works on the playground. This is a kind of demonizing rather than dealing rationally with the subject at hand.
As a side note, according to recent polls, about 46 percent of Americans believed in Creation by God, 32 percent believed in Theistic Evolution and only 15 percent believed, as Bill Nye believes, in the Molecules-to-Man story without any Divine intervention. The creationists surveyed are largely productive contributors to society, and many are scientists in such fields as chemistry, physics, engineering, medicine, etc. (source) This only proves that Bill is telling an untruth. It doesn’t prove the Creation-Flood Model. The bandwagon fallacy can’t prove the Creation-Flood Model any more than this fallacy can prove the Big-Bang-Billions-of-Years-No-Flood-Molecules-to-Man story. It is only what has been revealed about the Creation-Flood Model that is proven and the fact that God says so is the proof. We ought to rejoice, though, that such a large portion of the population of the United States is resistant to brain-washing.
When Bill Nye says, “this remarkable view of a worldwide flood that somehow influenced everything that we see in nature.” this is part of a complex fallacy. By mixing several fallacies, Bill is able to confuse his listeners. If what Bill says, “influenced everything that we see in nature,” were not a straw man fallacy, then it would truly be a remarkable view. In fact, the Big-Bang-Billions-of-Years-No-Flood-Molecules-to-Man story is a remarkable view, since it violates so many scientific laws. The idea that the Genesis Flood affected the entire world would be expected; however, it certainly didn’t influence everything that we see in nature.
Last updated: Sep, 2014
Toons & Vids
Logical Fallacy of Ad Hominem
Logical Fallacy of Abusive Ad Hominem / Character Assassination / Smear Campaign / Throwing Stones
Logical Fallacy of Name Calling / Nominalization / Labeling / Nouning
Logical Fallacy of Creating Misgivings / Ad Fidentia
Logical Fallacy of Circumstantial Ad Hominem/Appeal to Motive/Appeal to Conflict of Interest/Appeal to Personal Interest/Argument from Motives/Questioning Motives/Appeal to Vested Interest
Logical Fallacy of Ad Hominem Ridicule
Logical Fallacy of Ad Hominem Tu Quoque
The Logical Fallacy of Demonizing
Logical Fallacy of Demagoguery
Logical Fallacy of Dehumanizing
Logical Fallacy of Argumentum Ad Fidentia
Logical Fallacy of Tu Quoque / You Too / Appeal to Hypocrisy / Personal Inconsistency (a form of ad hominem)
Logical Fallacy of Origins / Genetic Fallacy / Fallacy of Virtue
Knights and Knaves Fallacy
Not Invented Here Fallacy
Corrupt Source Fallacy
Logical Fallacy of Poisoning the Well / Discrediting
Logical Fallacy of Guilt by Association Ad Hominem / Bad Company Fallacy / The Company that You Keep Fallacy / Ex Concessis
Logical Fallacy of Appeal to Popular Pieties / Popular Prejudice / Appeal to What is Popular / Homily Ad Hominem (type of)
Answer to Critic
Appeal to Possibility
Argument to the Future
Love Between a Man and Woman
Righteousness & Holiness
Proof by Atheism
Scriptures About Marriage
The Reason for Rejecting Truth
Witness on the Internet
Flaky Human Reasoning
How Do You Know?
The Real Purpose of the Church
The Real Purpose of Life
From Glory to Glory
REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT
REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT
How to be Led by God
How to Witness
Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality
Holiness & Mind/Soul
Redemption: Free From Sin
Stories Versus Revelation
Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty?
How Can We Know Anything?
Mind Designed to Relate to God
Answers for the Confused
Fossil Record Says: "Creation"
Avoid These Pitfalls
Public School's Religion
Public School Failures