Why Are Rationalized Speculations False?

Evolution is an alternate story to what God says happened.  God's story checks out scientifically if we eliminate the Atheistic assumptions of Atheistic science.  In fact, God's story matches what we can observe while the competing story, evolution, does not.  The evolutionists have not even been able to tell an uncheckable lie, but even if they were able to tell such a lie, that would not make the lie into the truth.  Who will you believe, God or a human being who makes errors and sins and does things wrong and makes mistakes and functions within a fake reality that doesn't even let him see real reality.

The reason that evolution's rationalized speculation are not valid is that no speculation, lie, made-up story, fantasy, or other fabrication is valid as proof of anything. Not only that, but the fallen state of the human mind without saving faith in Jesus and submission to the Holy Spirit will guarantee that speculation will be false. God does reveal. Revelation is always true. Many scientific discoveries have come this way. But the human mind is wicked and does not work properly unless it is being guided by the Holy Spirit. In fact, the follower of Christ is not always guided by the Holy Spirit due to the present immaturity of Christ the Body, so the follower of Christ will make many mistakes. The follower of Christ will always make a mistake every time he or she speculates. This is true no matter how much the perpetrator rationalizes or spiritualizes the fabrication. Evolution isn't science.

There are many rationalized fantasies involved at every point in the evolution hypothesis. The most important of these are:
Naturalism, God does nothing.
Materialism, There is no God.
Uniformitarianism, There was no creation or flood.

Rationalized speculations are statements of fantasies that have been put into language that makes them sound as if they were valid. There are many tricks that evolution-scientists use to try to give the impression that evolution is valid:
Coercion
Expensive, often tax-financed, displays
Control of school textbooks and curriculum
Control of print, film, and electronic media
Avoiding addressing the real issues
Clouding the real issues
Presenting falsified "proof"
Creative story-telling
Scoffing
Hiding or destroying evidence for creation
Misrepresenting evidence as supporting evolution when it does not
Couching assumptions in scientific language
Avoiding public debates with well-known creation-scientists

Detailed Answer

"In theory, there isn't any difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." - Yogi Berra

Rational-lie-zed speculation constitutes trying to give credibility to fantasy. Rational-lie-zed speculation is to science what fraud is to accounting. If we were to treat scientists as we treat CEOs, our jails would be full of evolution-scientists for years to come.

Although rational-lie-zed speculation, "the idea that the human mind can create revelations or truth without observation or experience," is the underlying belief on which evolutionism is built, a dedicated evolutionist would never mention this fact to anyone because that would destroy the false aura of credibility. An evolutionist must create the illusion of science.

One of the definitions of rational is sane. For the speculative rationalists, this is a wonderful tool. They can twist this dictionary meaning to mean, "If you don't accept my rational-lie-zed fantasies, then you are insane." If you don't accept their wild assumptions, they do indeed treat you as if you had lost your mind. They don't try to prove that rational-lie-zed speculation (making up data) is a valid form of reasoning. They just presuppose it. They usually just presuppose their rational-lie-zed speculation. This belief in rational-lie-zed speculation tends to be one of the basic beliefs of those who already believe in evolution, but it is difficult to convince those outside of the Humanist religion to embrace the false concept of "rational-lie-zed speculation is truth."

Here's a news flash. There is no such thing as a valid assumption. Think about it. How could anyone prove that his or her assumptions are truth? How could anyone prove that his or her unfounded assumptions are better than anyone else's unfounded assumptions? Yet theologians and evolutionists make the claim that their assumptions are the correct assumptions.

Here is another news flash. There is nothing that proves that rational-lie-zed speculation is a better form of reasoning than Divine revelation. There is nothing anywhere that even proves that rational-lie-zed speculation is a valid form of reasoning in any sense. Yet, we live in a society in which all of the media and most of the schools seems to be dogmatically following the doctrine of rational-lie-zed speculation and glorifying the so-called intellectuals.

Even though rational-lie-zed speculation has not proven any validity, many seem to have been looking down their noses at anyone who speaks of revelation from God. The entertainment industry has spent much effort in trying to make a case, in story form, against anyone who would turn to God for the answer to anything. Many have tried to make a case against the Bible, since the Bible presents itself as being a flawless revelation from God. Even some of those who accept the Bible as the Word of God want to interpret the Bible by the power of the intellect through logic, which has as its sandy basis, rational-lie-zed speculation, rather than seeking the mind of God for the interpretation of the Bible. And there have always been those who have claimed to have a revelation when, in fact, they have only had a rational-lie-zed speculation.

There is an Almighty God. He is real. He is absolute. If there were no Almighty God, it might make sense to depend on rational-lie-zed speculation, though making up facts would be hard to defend in any case. If God did not love us, or if God did not want to fellowship with us, it might be easier to defend. However, the reality of the Almighty God Who loves us and wants to fellowship with us and speak to us is evident to everyone in all that He has created. Those who are involved in the lawlessness of the Humanist religion have just chosen to be willingly ignorant of the fact that God exists and that all who keep seeking Him with a sincere heart do find Him. Those who have chosen to be willingly ignorant have done so because they loved darkness more than light.

The evolutionist will speak forcefully as if his or her evolutionistic rational-lie-zed speculations made sense. If that doesn't work, then the evolutionist will use ridicule, name-calling, and coercion. Evolutionists go quickly to implying a lack of intelligence, implying a lack of knowledge, or implying insanity. They are skilled at coercion. These are some of the techniques that work on most people.

Also, evolutionists are greatly helped by the fact that most of them take the attitude that they have superior intelligence. They really believe it, too.

Human intelligence is not the problem, though either evolutionists or creationists may think that those on the other side of the issue are stupid. The real problem is wisdom. As with so many other issues today, wisdom is the key. A high level of intelligence is required to follow many of the mental loops of the speculatively rationalistic intellectual, but intelligence is not wisdom. Most people can't even follow the loopy logic of their "intellectual" gurus, so they simply cave in and blindly follow. Wisdom, on the other hand, is a gift God gives to those who respect and honor Him. The respect and honor of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom. That's why some very intelligent people are falling for some very foolish concepts, one of which is the concept of evolution.

One of the key concepts of the Humanist Religion is the concept of the intellectual. The intellectual is to Humanism what the prophet is to the way of Christ. God has prophets, but He warns of false prophets. A prophet is one who is first called by God, then, in answering that call, so yields himself to God that he speaks as the mouth-piece of God. The intellectual is a person who is able to speak a vision from his or her own heart and not out of the mouth of God. Jeremiah, the prophet, described these people who speak a vision from their own hearts as being false prophets, but the pushers of the religious beliefs of false beliefs exalt these false prophets as being intellectuals. So, once again, the promoters of ungodly religious beliefs find themselves in direct opposition to God.

Some people think that rational-lie-zed speculation is a wonderful thing. From an evolutionist's viewpoint, the word, rational, is an opportunity to confuse. Does it mean sane? Sure it does. The dictionary says so. Let's confuse that meaning with some of it's other meanings and use it to carry off the flimflam. Rational, as used by evolutionists, means that the human mind can make up knowledge without the benefit of observation, revelation, or any other thing. Specifically, if you are an evolutionist, you want to zero in on a few very wild rational-lie-zed speculations that you define as the basis of rational thought. These rational-lie-zed speculations are treated as "revelations" of the carnal mind of man, and they are exalted by those who lean on the carnal mind. These "revelations" have come down to them from the great intellectuals (false prophets), and so they falsely believed to be valid. And then the evolutionists insist that everyone should accept these "revelations" as being axioms that cannot be questioned. Then, they imply that anyone who doesn't believe in their "revelations" is irrational. They try to fool everyone into thinking that if anyone won't accept their "revelations" then that person is insane. This constitutes a foul form of coercion and religious persecution against followers of Christ.

If you are a follower of Christ, these tactics are designed to make you fall in line. The evolutionists would love to convert you to their religion, but they will be happy if they can just belittle you in front of others. Don't look for even basic human courtesy from them. That would be rare. If they can't belittle you, then they win a victory if they can just get you to slink away or get you to try to fit in by being silent. Silence will not protect you, though. If you are a follower of Christ, then you owe it to yourself to get the facts. There is some information on this web site, but there are videos available at drdino.com, and other web sites.

If, on the other hand, you want to be a great evolutionist, you must learn how to fool people with a little deceptive patter about being rational. You play with the double meaning of this word, rational. Of course, you are really making the whole thing up, speculatively rationalizing.

The three "revelations" that evolutionists want people to accept are:

Materialism (the assumption that there is no God, angels, or spirits),

Naturalism (the assumption that nothing happens because of God, angels, or spirits), and

Uniformitarianism (The assumption that there was no flood or creation).

Then, given these three assumptions, I mean "revelations," the evolutionists set out to prove three things:

That there is no God,

That nothing happens because of God, angels, or spirits, and

That there was no flood, and there was no creation.

Seems kind of like a set up, doesn't it. The only problem that evolutionists face is that facts have foiled the plan.

Of course, the facts prove the evolutionists to be wrong, so they always remember to only use creative stories and stay away from using just the facts. If they do give facts, they use only those facts that they can weave into their creative stories. There is no factual proof of evolution. Every so-called proof is based in speculatively rationalistic fabrication. If you are an evolutionist, human creativity works in your favor. If you are a follower of Christ, you know that lying is an abomination to God. God hates it if you embellish the truth. Your mind is not the source of truth; God is. How different the viewpoint of follower of Christ is from that of the evolutionist regarding the validity of made up stories.

The conservatives tell rational-lie-zed speculations, too, but their hearts just don't seem to be in it. They certainly aren't as good at it. Conservatives have hang ups. They tend to follow principles of Christ. They tend to believe that making up stories is the same as lying. And then they tend to believe that it's a sin to tell a lie.

To a convert of any unreal religious system, a rational-lie-zed speculation is the truth. Ungodly thinkers are always open-minded, but only to ungodly ideas. You'll notice how quickly the pushers of ungodly religious beliefs can think of a way to rational-lies away any evidence of God or His power at work in your everyday life. If you are a follower of Jesus who walks in the Spirit, you have experienced miracles from time to time, those time when God just does something to help you or someone you know. When you tell a follower of Humanism about it, they are very quick to try to explain it away. Don't feel bad, the apostle, Paul, had the same experience when dealing with the godless Greeks. 1 Corinthians 1:23

One would have to be a great speculative rational-lies-zer to be an evolutionist. Evolutionism is itself one of the greatest of all of the ungodly speculative rational-lies-zations.

There is an interesting side-effect that makes it harder for an evolutionist to tell the truth. This side-effect is a huge financial bonus that comes to evolutionists. Once a person becomes an evolutionist, free government money just flows to the evolutionist. He or she can scoop up all those government grants and they really do have it made. If they, on the other hand, find evidence that disproves evolution, then they will watch those grants quickly disappear.

Evolutionists must be very careful as to what evidence they uncover. If they're not willing to play the game, they get cut off. That's it! No free money for those who don't fall in line! Now you may ask, "Isn't it hypocritical to confess a belief in evolution just to get money?" If an evolutionist says in his or her heart, "There is no God and I don't believe the Bible." then he or she is free to define ethics to fit the need. For people with no Biblical basis and no relationship with Jesus, money cures most ethical problems. An ungodly person is truly liberated from righteousness, though they are a slave to sin as stated in Romans 6:16-22. For a post-modernist, the main concern is getting caught and exposed.

The question comes up, "Is evolution a theory, or is it a SSWAAFT?" That's valid question. A theory is a SSWAAFT that has been pretty well tested by observation. It is a SSWAAFT for which no conflicting data has been found. In other words, it has never been disproved. That doesn't mean it's true. It would be an uncheckable lie, though. There is a problem with the facts; they just ruin this great molecules-to-man evolution conjecture / fabrication (often erroneously called a theory).  But, if evolution were a theory, it would have had to have been tested by observation and no conflicting data would have been found. Evolutionists soon learn not to get into this trap of looking at the facts. They just say, "It's a theory!" and they say it with great confidence. Some are even so bold as to call evolution, scientific fact. That would be funny, except for the fact that they often get away with it. The one thing evolutionists want is to silence every other voice and cover up all the facts and observation that prove that their SSWAAFT is an impossibility.

Facts are not the friend of the evolutionist. If you are an evolutionist and you let people back you into this fact corner, you are doomed. Evolution hasn't been tested by observation. It can't be tested by observation. There was such hope that the fossil evidence would help, but the fossil evidence doesn't prove evolution. The fossil evidence actually destroys the whole concept of evolution. Not only that, but over and over, real scientists keep finding things that show evolution to be a really silly story. Anyone who is arguing for evolution, has to overcome all these terrible obstacles.

Every evolutionist should know that evolutionistic Doctors of Biology avoid a public debate with creation scientists. There's a good reason for this. The evolutionists always lose.

Even though evolution falls into the category of SSWAAFT, when the evolutionists call it a theory, almost every news anchor, most publications, most of the public schools, ungodly judges in the courts, and the entertainment industry will back up the evolutionists. Many people don't care enough to even challenge the evolutionists on evolution. If they do challenge the idea of evolution, the evolutionists usually resorts to name-calling, using such terms as "flat-earthers." Oddly, name-calling usually works for evolutionists, childish as it is.

Evolutionists are forced to hold on tightly to some basic presuppositions.  These presuppositions are just simple-minded assumptions.  They are filters and a way to censor out any information that supports the existence of God.  They set up a web of rules to filter out God.  They will only accept those things that conform to Naturalism, Materialism, and Uniformitarianism.  Naturalism claims that God does nothing.  Materialism claims that there is no God or spiritual realm.  Uniformitarianism claims that there was not creation and that there was no violent worldwide flood, as the Bible and numerous other historical accounts record.  Whatever they observe that does not conform to this complex filter is censored.  The way that it is censored can take several forms.  Evolutionists may boldly proclaim that, though the data appears to support design and refute Evolution, yet it still must be interpreted to mean just the opposite of what it does mean.  A backup method that Evolutionists use is to prophecy that in the future, science will be able to explain what they see as an anomaly.  If that fails, they will hide the data, set it aside, or lie to keep the public from knowing the truth.  The reality is that these people, for whatever reason, don't what to know the Creator.  They don't want to truly know Jesus, their Creator.

Summary

Rom 8:7 because the carnal mind is enmity against God, for it is not subject to the Law of God, neither indeed can it be.

There are many rationalized speculations involved at every point in the evolution hypothesis. The most important of these are: Naturalism, God does nothing. Materialism, There is no God. Uniformitarianism, There was no creation or flood.

Rationalized speculations are statements of speculations that have been put into language that makes them sound as if they were valid. There are many tricks that evolution-scientists use to try to give the impression that evolution is valid. Evolution isn't science.