The Darkness Absorbtion Process

If Post Modernism makes sense, then it makes sense to believe in The Darkness Absorption Process. Please forgive the tongue in cheek approach. Here is the point from Scripture: Romans 8:7 because the carnal mind is enmity against God, for it is not subject to the Law of God, neither indeed can it be.

The Darkness Absorption Process:

Although, in the past, it was believed by scientists that electric bulbs emit light, recent information has proven otherwise. The term light bulb has been quite misleading in this regard implying that light bulbs emit light when they simply absorb darkness. There is currently discussion that will, in all probability, lead to legislation requiring all appliances of this type to be re-named dark absorption appliances or simply DAA (pronounced Duh!). Electric light bulbs absorb darkness, transmitting it through wires where it is eventually disposed of by fossil fuel or nuclear powered machinery. This proves the Darkness Absorption Theory.

A few simple experiments can be conducted that will demonstrate the way darkness works. First, in the room in which you are, you can observe that there is much less darkness next to the DAA than elsewhere. Second, obtain a burned out DAA and observe that, once full of darkness (indicated by a dark spot on a full DAA), it has no more capacity for absorption. The third experiment will require a lake. At the surface of water, there is a great deal of light. Slowly moving deeper and deeper, the water becomes progressively darker until there is almost total darkness. This demonstrates that darkness, heavier than light, sinks to the bottom forcing the light to the top, hence the name light.

The candle, a primitive DAA, illustrates some of the physical laws involved. A new candle has a white wick. It can be observed that after the first use, the wick turns black. This residual darkness on the wick cannot be removed without destroying the wick itself. As the darkness is destroyed in the flame, the wax and wick are also eventually destroyed in the process. A safe experiment one may perform is to put a pencil next to the wick of an operating candle; it will turn black. This points out that if an object is in the direct path of the dark flowing into the more primitive DAA, residual darkness will be the result.

Darkness is faster than light. This can be demonstrated by slowly opening a closet door. You can see the light going into the closet, but you can't see the dark escaping.

Transportable DAA, known as flashlights, simply absorb darkness and must be connected to batteries. The battery derives its name from the fact that each unit is capable of destroying a finite quantity of darkness by battering it within a metal case. When the battery is full of battered darkness, it must be either emptied or replaced before the flashlight can operate again.

A Little Fun With Post-Modernism

This article exposes some methods used to call darkness light and light darkness. The term darkness absorption appliance implies that there is suction and a sucker. The term DAA (Duh!) applies more to suckers than to light emitters; however, it seems that there is no escaping being sucked in from time to time. Although purely tongue-in-cheek, this article points out some warnings. False science, for instance, preaches the hypothesis of evolution which is contrary to proven scientific laws like the second law of thermodynamics and the law of entropy.

The Evolutionists will tell you a half truth about the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The Evolutionists will tell the half truth: "The Second Law of Thermodynamics only applies to isolated systems, so it's not relevant to evolution, because the Earth is an open system." This is a clever lie. Here is the part of the truth that they are withholding: the Second Law of Thermodynamics was derived using theoretical isolated systems, but it applies to all systems, and can only be overcome locally and temporarily in open systems when stringent conditions are met. Not only that, but we are not talking about the Earth. The Earth is just a subsystem of a much larger system called the Universe. The Universe is an isolated system. Evolutionists claim that Evolution took place in this isolated system, but the Second Law of Thermodynamics tells us that their story is a myth.

More information on the Second Law of Thermodynamics can be found here & here & here & here & here

So-called intellectuals use several tools to convince themselves and others that lies are true and that right is wrong. One of the most popular of these tools is the excessive use of the passive voice to create an aura of authority. Presupposition (to make speculative assumptions) is possibly the most prevalent method of distorting truth. These assumptions, then, become the foundation for circular reasoning and equivocation and other such loopy logic techniques. Of course, rational-lie-zed speculation can be used to prove anything--no matter how ridiculous. You can rationalize anything.

What are the arbitrary assumptions that cause the ungodly to stumble? These assumptions are filters and a way to censor out any information that supports the existence of God.  They set up a web of rules to filter out God.  The ungodly hold these three arbitrary assumptions dogmatically and will only accept those things that conform to Naturalism, materialism, and uniformitarianism.  Naturalism claims that God does nothing.  Materialism claims that there is no God or spiritual realm.  Uniformitarianism claims that there was not creation and that there was no violent worldwide flood, as the Bible and numerous other historical accounts record.  Whatever they observe that does not conform to this complex filter is censored.  The way that it is censored can take several forms.  The ungodly may boldly proclaim that, though the data appears to support God's version and refute the version of the ungodly, yet it still must be interpreted to mean just the opposite of what it does mean.  A backup method that ungodly people use is to prophecy that in the future, science will be able to explain what they see as an anomaly.  If that fails, they will hide the data, set it aside, or lie to keep the public from knowing the truth.  The data clearly demolishes the story of the ungodly and clearly supports the reality of the Creator God, His Bible, and His abiding Presence in His people.  When confronted with the obvious, a closed-minded ungodly person says, "I can't understand it."  They are willingly ignorant because they refuse to hold God in their knowledge.  The reality is that these people, for whatever reason, don't what to know the Creator.  They don't want to truly know Jesus, their Creator.