click here to learn more about being redeemed from sin and set free to serve God in spirit and in truth. click here to learn more about holiness click here to learn more about being changed into the same image click here to learn more about sowing and reaping click here to learn more about the free gift of righteousness. click here to learn more about how faith gives us access to grace and grace does the works. click here to learn more about faith and how it comes. click here to learn more about acknowledging Jesus click here to learn more about how God speaks Who will you listen to?  Click here to learn more. click here to learn more about the pattern of God. click here to learn more about the pattern of God for individuals, marriage, and family. click here to learn more about the pattern of God for the local church click here to learn more about the Church universal
 
SeekFind Logo Menu

16 Reasons Radiometric Dating is Flimflam

 

 

16 Reasons Radiometric Dating is Flimflam:

  1. None of the assumptions used to calculate the age of the Earth are provable, or testable, or even reasonable. They are arbitrary assumptions. It is irrational to be arbitrary. To present the results of calculations based on arbitrary assumptions as though it were scientific is deceptive to say the least.

    How to do radiometric dating, a quick overview

  2. The essential factors required to calculate an age include
    1. measuring the element concentrations (measureable using science)
    2. having certainty of element stability over long periods of time (arbitrary assumption alone)
    3. having knowledge of the half-life – how long it takes for the parent radioactive substance to be reduced to the daughter element by 50%  (arbitrary assumption alone)
    4. knowing initial concentration of the parent and daughter radioactive elements, i.e., the initial concentrations on Earth’s first day  (arbitrary assumption alone)
  3. No one has ever measured decay rates directly.
  4. If assumed decay rates are in the range of billions of years, it is impossible to determine the actual decay rate from measurements over only a few decades.
  5. Decay rates are poorly known.
  6. Decay rates are affected by the physical environment.
  7. Original parent element concentration is not known and no method exists to measure the original concentration.
  8. Original daughter decay product concentration is not known and no method exists to measure the original concentration.
  9. If the dating methods are an objective and reliable means of determining ages, they should agree. However, with radiometric dating, the different techniques often give different results.
  10. Because it is common to get wild variations in dates using all the ratiometric dating methods, selectively discarding dates is a common practice within the radiometric dating industry. (Techniques that give results that can be dismissed just because they don’t agree with what we already believe cannot be considered objective.)
  11. A scientist cannot do experiments on events that happened in the past. The past is not open to the normal processes of experimental science, that is, repeatable experiments in the present.
  12. Scientists do not measure the age of rocks, they measure isotope concentrations.
  13. The age is calculated using assumptions about the past that cannot be proven.
  14. Since there is no way in which these assumptions can be tested, there is no sure way (except by divine revelation) of knowing the true age of any geological formation.
  15. The convergence of scientific natural evidence actually undermines the validity of radiometric dating.
  16. Using non-radiometric indicators (for example: Ocean sedimentation rates, Ocean salinity, Magnetic field decay, Meteorite collisions, Moon dust, Earth–Moon separation), the age of the Earth is compatible with the Genesis account rather than millions and billions of years.

We are not dogmatically claiming to know that the Earth is 6,000 years old. We know that God created the Heavens and the Earth in six days and we know the number of generations between Adam and Christ. That's about it. Even though a plain reading of Scripture seems to indicate a young Earth; even though there is zero observed evidence and only circular reasoning and speculations that support old Earth stories, we can't even deny the possibility that God could have done something that Scripture doesn't hint at and that has left no scientific evidence. It is possible. It just is not worth the time to think about it.

References:

http://www.darwinthenandnow.com/2013/11/the-hoodwinking-art-of-radiometric-dating/#more-5715

http://creation.com/index-fossils

http://creation.com/fossils-wrong-place

http://creation.com/fossil-taxonomic-manipulations

http://creation.com/fossil-range-expansions

http://creation.com/dodging-living-fossils

http://creation.com/geological-conflict

http://creation.com/age-of-the-earth

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-radiometric-dating-prove



Author/Compiler
Last updated: Feb, 2014
 
 




Bread Crumbs

 
Home     >   Meaning     >   Christian Witness     >   Answers for Witness     >   Stories Versus Revelation     >   Creation, Flood, Etc.     >   The Age of the Earth     >   What Does Science Say?     >   16 Reasons Radiometric Dating is Flimflam

Main

Foundations

Home

Meaning

Bible

Dictionary

History

Toons & Vids

Quotations

Similar

16 Reasons Radiometric Dating is Flimflam


Recent

Home

Answer to Critic

Appeal to Possibility

Circular Reasoning

Argument to the Future

Insignificant Cause

Word Magic

Love Between a Man and Woman

Author/Compiler

Colossians 2

Righteousness & Holiness

Don't Compromise

Sin

Proof by Atheism

Scriptures About Marriage

Genuine Authority

The Reason for Rejecting Truth

Witness on the Internet

Flaky Human Reasoning

How Do You Know?



Featured


The Real Purpose of the Church

The Real Purpose of Life

From Glory to Glory

REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT

REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT

How to be Led by God

How to Witness

Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality

Holiness & Mind/Soul

Redemption: Free From Sin

Real Reality

Stories Versus Revelation

Understanding Logic

Logical Fallacies

Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty?

How Can We Know Anything?

God's Word

God's Process

God's Pattern

Mind Designed to Relate to God

Answers for the Confused

Fossil Record Says: "Creation"

Avoid These Pitfalls

Public School's Religion

Twisting Science

Evolutionism

Public School Failures

Twisting History


How can we know anything about anything? That's the real question

more info: mouseover or click

The complexity of Gods Way understood in a single diagram
Obey your flesh and descend into darkness