|Australopithecus Afarensis, or Lucy--The Difference Between Science and Fantasy?|
If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.
Lucy, Australopithecus Afarensis
The Evolutionists tell sad lies about Australopithecus africanus.
A dedicated evolutionist will accept just about anything to prove evolution. They have eliminated creation without examination of the issue. A person who is willingly ignorant will hide his or her eyes from the truth and never realize that they are doing it. This reference can't really help them. This is written for the believer in Christ who has been lied to by the Evolutionists. "If anyone is so mentally constituted as to feel that this "completes a human evolutionary chain," I am sure that nothing I could say would discourage that person." Professor Marvin L. Lubenow Fact versus fiction: the recent Ethiopian fossils
A dedicated Evolutionist may accuse you of either lacking research skills or being despicable if you site a creation science website. The Evolutionist thinks that he or she is into science, but the Evolutionists presuppositions are so strong that they cannot see. They are blind. Everything looks, to them, like Evolution. They cannot bear to think of the Almighty God Who created everything.
Australopithecus africanus-this was at one time promoted as the missing link. It is no longer considered to be on the line from apes to humans. It is very ape-like. Is there really evidence that man descended from the apes?
In 2006, Creationsafaris posted this: When you scrape away the hype and artistic license, most of the details of the actual bones seem to back up criticisms by creationists that this is nothing more than an extinct ape. Read More
In 2009, more facts have come in, and this appeared on the site: "Mr. Huxley, I am a man created in the image of God, and you are an evolved mammal. Everything you do revolves around eating and mating. Tell me, why should I believe anything you say?" Read More
This 2009 article gets to the core of the problem--here is a small quote: Evidence can be badly misinterpreted, as any lawyer knows. Read More
Last updated: Jun, 2013
Toons & Vids
Science Shows Us That There Are No Transitional Forms, Disproving Evolutionism's Stories
Evolution Has Long Been Debunked. Evolutionists Will Not Let Go Because They Don't Want God.
Archaeopteryx was not a transitional form
What part did zeal play in the misrepresentation of Ramapithecus?
Why wasn't the Nebraska Man an example of a transitional form?
Why was Java Man not evidence for evolution?
How did Homo Erectus prove to be another example of evolutionistic wishful thinking?
How did Homo Habilis prove the weakness of scientists in jumping to conclusions?
How did scientists withhold facts to give a false impression regarding Australopithecine?
Neanderthal Man Does Not Support Evolution
How did the creativity of scientists and artists lead to the Cro-Magnon Man error?
Australopithecus Afarensis, or Lucy--The Difference Between Science and Fantasy?
What can we expect in the future from those who are committed to evolution as a dogma?
Answer to Critic
Appeal to Possibility
Argument to the Future
Love Between a Man and Woman
Righteousness & Holiness
Proof by Atheism
Scriptures About Marriage
The Reason for Rejecting Truth
Witness on the Internet
Flaky Human Reasoning
How Do You Know?
The Real Purpose of the Church
The Real Purpose of Life
From Glory to Glory
REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT
REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT
How to be Led by God
How to Witness
Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality
Holiness & Mind/Soul
Redemption: Free From Sin
Stories Versus Revelation
Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty?
How Can We Know Anything?
Mind Designed to Relate to God
Answers for the Confused
Fossil Record Says: "Creation"
Avoid These Pitfalls
Public School's Religion
Public School Failures