Evil Darwin Quotes and Evil Evolution Quotes Evolutionary Psychology: Sayings About Evolutionary Psychology Intelligent Design, Sayings About Intelligent Design Mutations--Sayings About Mutations

Every once in awhile we need to take our readers kicking and screaming into the stench of the baloney factory to show them how the Darwin sausage is made.  We know you can only stand it for a few minutes at a time.  This is the garbage that is force-fed to students.  They have no choice; it’s the only thing on the menu.  http://creationsafaris.com/crev200805.htm#20080506b

You can't build anything solid on ever-shifting Darwin quicksand.  ~ creationsafaris.com

Observational (i.e., scientific) evidence, as seen in medical research every day, leads one to be skeptical of the claims of evolutionary biology. How does science explain that mythical first bacterial cell three billion years ago? Did it transform itself--by random mutations in the DNA--into all the "wondrous profusion" of life forms (one million species), and all their wondrous functional organs, over an imaginary time period? The evidence says no.  ~ Dr. Barney Maddox

The question “How did life originate?” which interests all of us, is inseparably linked to the question “Where did the information come from?” Since the findings of James D. Watson . . . and Francis H. C. Crick, it was increasingly realized by contemporary researchers that the information residing in the cells is of crucial importance for the existence of life. Anybody who wants to make meaningful statements about the origin of life would be forced to explain how the information originated. All evolutionary views are fundamentally unable to answer this crucial question. ~ Werner Gitt, In the Beginning was Information: A Scientist Explains the Incredible Design of Nature (Green Forest, AR: Master Books, [2005] 2006), 99.

With all my scientific skill and depth of understanding, I have attempted to find a rationale to accept evolutionary postulates for the creation of life; and have failed.  Similarly, I have found it scientifically plausible and experimentally supportable to extrapolate current geologic conditions back in a short amount of time through cataclysmic events in support of a young-Earth. (That the framework for these two findings is provided within the text of a 3,000 year old document reinforces my belief in the scientific veracity of Scripture.) ~ NASA scientist Michael Tigges

Quantitative information in genetics today is proving evolutionary theory as simply a man-made and irrational philosophical belief. ~ Dr. Barney Maddox

Following a discourse on the total lack of any evidence for evolutionism that to which a sane person would be able to relate, Meredith continues with this: "Of course it [evolution] doesn't [make sense].  We are, after all, animals that have experienced the quixotic touch of evolution by natural selection, and that’s anything but an orderly process.  Our past is just as messy as any animal that’s been around for millions of years, and we should be prepared to expect the unexpected when the next fossil is announced." ~ Meredith Small, evolutionist, unknowingly giving yet another example of evolutionism's schizophrenic dogmatism.

It's all futureware, speculation, smoke and mirrors, bluffing and ignorance.  Don’t let anyone fool you into thinking this is scientific.  The use of scientific instruments does not justify calling this science.  Alchemists used the best instruments available . . .  Their findings about what did not make gold proved useful when the real science of chemistry supplanted alchemy.  But none of the effort, the experimentation, the writing, or the speculation justified the premise of alchemy at all.  Similarly, astrobiologists and chemical evolutionists are revising experimental methods and learning many things about chemicals while ruling out scenarios that prove hopeless for evolving life.  What remains is a bundle of raw speculation that has not yet been ruled out.  Speculation is not science. ~ creationsafaris.com/crev200707.htm#20070727a

How can this multiply-discredited theory [evolution] ever get falsified?  The evidence can be 180° opposite Darwin’s prediction, and yet they turn it into a great victory.  Nobody asks any hard questions.  Nobody calls foul.  Nobody sees the intellectual crime being committed.  They get away with it, time and time again.  Doesn’t anyone in the scientific and media establishments have any sense any more? ~ creationsafaris.com

. . . evolutionary speculation is superstition.  That’s what we should call it. ~ creationsafaris.com

All (mis-)interpretations of Genesis which deny its plain meaning, e.g. day-age, gap theory, theistic evolution, must assert that death, ‘the last enemy’ (1 Cor. 15:26) was a part of the ‘very good’ creation (Gen. 1:31).5 ~ creationontheweb.com/content/view/2417/

Darwinists boast that ‘nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution,’ but the major disciplines of biology – including anatomy, botany, embryology, genetics, microbiology, paleontology, physiology and zoology – were founded either before Darwin or by scientists who rejected his theory.  Agriculture and medicine – the two disciplines that have provided us with the most practical benefits – owe nothing to Darwinism. ~ Jonathan Wells, PhD, “Top Ten Highlights” from The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design (Regnery, 2007)

What a colorful phrase—“reckless drafts on the bank of time.”  Doesn’t that describe the banking habits of evolutionary biologists and geologists still today?  They think long ages provide a blank check for any miracles they need.  It was good for these three men to set the record straight.  Kelvin was not perfect, but he was a heck of a lot better scientist than many geologists of his day and thereafter who speculate with utter disregard for the realities of thermodynamics.  Unless someone holds them accountable, these reckless checkwriters will continue to commit fraud via time laundering and heat laundering. ~ creationsafaris.com

We know that the computer is the product of careful design, but to argue that the much more complex human brain is an accident of nature makes very little sense! ~ creationmoments.com/radio/transcript.php?t=1912

Whenever you hear evolutionists saying, “Now we know,” you know two things: (1) they didn't know anything before, and (2) they’re lying.  Now we know is code that a new just-so dime novel has hit the bookshelves, to replace the last one that got exposed as a fraud ~ creationsafaris.com

Evolution . . . is an idea developed from a conscious mind; it’s not a person, place, or thing.  It can’t do anything because there is no “it” to do anything.  When pushed, evolutionists, who are materialists, would have to admit that no one has ever seen the invisible entity that has been named “evolution.” ~ Gary DeMar