Short Answer

If Post Modernism makes sense, then it makes sense to believe in The Darkness Absorption Process.  Please forgive the tongue in cheek approach.  Here is the point from Scripture: Romans 8:7  because the carnal mind is enmity against God, for it is not subject to the Law of God, neither indeed can it be.

Detail

Although, in the past, it was believed by scientists that electric bulbs emit light, recent information has proven otherwise. The term light bulb has been quite misleading in this regard implying that light bulbs emit light when they simply absorb darkness. There is currently discussion that will, in all probability, lead to legislation requiring all appliances of this type to be re-named dark absorption appliances or simply DAA (pronounced Duh!). Electric light bulbs absorb darkness, transmitting it through wires where it is eventually disposed of by fossil fuel or nuclear powered machinery. This proves the Darkness Absorption Theory.

A few simple experiments can be conducted that will demonstrate the way darkness works. First, in the room in which you are, you can observe that there is much less darkness next to the DAA than elsewhere. Second, obtain a burned out DAA and observe that, once full of darkness (indicated by a dark spot on a full DAA), it has no more capacity for absorption. The third experiment will require a lake. At the surface of water, there is a great deal of light. Slowly moving deeper and deeper, the water becomes progressively darker until there is almost total darkness. This demonstrates that darkness, heavier than light, sinks to the bottom forcing the light to the top, hence the name light.

The candle, a primitive DAA, illustrates some of the physical laws involved. A new candle has a white wick. It can be observed that after the first use, the wick turns black. This residual darkness on the wick cannot be removed without destroying the wick itself. As the darkness is destroyed in the flame, the wax and wick are also eventually destroyed in the process. A safe experiment one may perform is to put a pencil next to the wick of an operating candle; it will turn black. This points out that if an object is in the direct path of the dark flowing into the more primitive DAA, residual darkness will be the result.

Darkness is faster than light. This can be demonstrated by slowly opening a closet door. You can see the light going into the closet, but you can't see the dark escaping.

Transportable DAA, known as flashlights, simply absorb darkness and must be connected to batteries. The battery derives its name from the fact that each unit is capable of destroying a finite quantity of darkness by battering it within a metal case. When the battery is full of battered darkness, it must be either emptied or replaced before the flashlight can operate again.

Summary

This article exposes some methods used to call darkness light and light darkness. The term darkness absorption appliance implies that there is suction and a sucker. The term DAA (Duh!) applies more to suckers than to light emitters; however, it seems that there is no escaping being sucked in from time to time. Although purely tongue-in-cheek, this article points out some warnings. False science, for instance, preaches the hypothesis of evolution which is contrary to proven scientific laws like the second law of thermodynamics and the law of entropy.

So-called intellectuals use several tools to convince themselves and others that lies are true and that right is wrong. One of the most popular of these tools is the excessive use of the passive voice to create an aura of authority. Presupposition (to make speculative assumptions) is possibly the most prevalent method of distorting truth. These assumptions, then, become the foundation for circular reasoning and equivocation and other such loopy logic techniques. Of course, rational-lie-zed speculation can be used to prove anything--no matter how ridiculous. You can rationalize anything.