Answers

Is There A Quick Way To Understand Why Evolution Is Not Science? Why Can't Evolutionists Find Answers That Make Sense? The Problems with Evolution: What are the Problems with the Theory of Evolution What Is Wrong With Theistic Evoltution? Ptolemy's Geocentric System Of The Universe And Evolution Problems With Evolution: The Bible, Evolution, & Creation How could everything have created itself? Can Things Can Create Themselves? How Could The Amazing Complexity Of Every Cell Have Come About By Chance? DNA is proof of creation. Evolutionists are in illogical denial of this obvious fact. Evolutionistic Cult's Nefarious Campaign To Confuse America’s Children And Undermine Scientific Understanding. Complexity, Information, And The 2nd Law Of Thermodynamics Show Evolution To Be Impossible Evolution Is A Series Of Broken Arguments Is Sickle-cell Anemia An Example Of Evolution In The Present Day? Can New Information Can Arise In Genomes By Duplication And Mutation? Is The Adaptation Of Bacteria To Feeding On Nylon Waste An Example Of Evolution? Did E-Coli Evolve? Are Super-germs An Example Of Evolution In Action? Has The HIV Virus Demonstrated Evolution In Any Way? Has anyone ever seen proof of evolution? There Is No Evidence Of So-Called Evolutionary Links Between Kinds Of Living Things Evolution Is Flim-flam Big Bang is balony What must one do to be an evolutionist? What is the new type of scientific method that has been developed especially for evolution? How do evolutionists deal with the concept of spontaneous generation of life? Breeding experiments have done much to debunk the evolutionary dogma, haven't they? What Is The Basis Or Mechanism That Would Allow Evolutionism's Claims To Work? What About Evolutionism And Racism? Is It True That Most People Believe In Darwinism? How is the presentation of evolution similar to the performance of a magic trick? Links And Technical Information

The only alternative to creation, and a goofy alternative at that, is evolution.  Creation is obvious.  The more we are able to observe, the more silly the theory of Evolution becomes.

Listening to the naturalistic scientists, the volume of ego is amazing.  By starting with an assumption of evolution, an old earth and an assumption of naturalism, they prove evolution, an old earth and naturalism.  Starting with an assumption of a big bang, they can prove the big bang.  If you assume what you are trying to prove and then use your assumption to prove it, that is circular reasoning.