There are two ways of looking at how this world came to be with all of its people, plants and rocks. Each view point is religiously defended by a group of people who are wondering how the other side could ever believe what they believe. It's really funny how dogmatic we can become concerning issues about which we know little or even nothing at all. One side believes that almighty God created everything. The other side believes that everything created itself. Each side states that the other side's claim is obviously bogus. What is the foundation of each of these views?

Oh yes, there it a third side that says something like this: God created the rocks and then the plants and animals created themselves out of the rocks. One could go on with variations that try to present things like the idea that God created the rocks and one or more one-celled animals or plants, and then the rest of the plants and animals created themselves out of those little living things. Anyway, the idea is that God wound up the clock and then left everything to complete itself.

The side that believes that everything created itself finds it hard to believe that Almighty God could create everything. This is mostly because the idea of God violates an assumption that they like a lot. That is the assumption that there is no God.

The assumption that there is no God is supported by tons of circular reasoning and lots of cheerleaders. These cheerleaders are sometimes called professors, news anchors, intellectuals, or scientists, but they are only cheerleaders. If you believe that the very idea of God creating everything is not possible, then you ought to be able to identify what specifically would cause that to be impossible.

What could make it impossible for God to exist?

What could make it impossible for Almighty God to create the universe and everything in it?

If you are a believer in any form of evolution, you have to ask yourself,

"What makes me believe in it?" Evolution isn't science.

Have you personally seen any evidence of it?

Is evolution just what you choose to believe just because you do?

What is your motivation for wanting evolution to be fact?

The reality is, that you have not personally seen any evidence of evolution, because there is none.

Of course, you must realize that evidence does not consist of a bunch of creative stories. Lies are not proof of anything.

Evolutionists like to say, "Well, prove that God exists." Yet, every evolutionist knows, in his or her deepest being, that God had proved His existence to him or her repeatedly throughout his or her lifetime. They know. They are just in denial and trying to sear their consciences.

Even if a complete story of evolution could be made up that did not conflict with any proven scientific data, that would simply make that story a better lie.

By the way, every tale of evolution does conflict with proven data. Evolution isn't science.  But if someone were able to make up such a lie, the lie would still be a lie. Anyone can make up a rational-lies-zation, but evidence, that's something else. If rational-lies-zations were evidence, then anything could be proved because anything can be rationalized.