American Government funds the Naturalist/Materialist faith group's recruitment and indoctrination.  This is largely because of Secular Humanism’s chameleon-like ability to present itself as a religion when it is to their advantage to be a religion and as a non-religion when that is to their advantage. Also, other materialistic and naturalistic faith groups present themselves as non-religions.  It isn’t just Humanism that is in on this gravy train, but other New Age religions are also at the feeding trough. New Age religions are indeed religions, and they are markedly anti-Christian and anti-Semitic.

Detailed Answer

Members of the Humanist Religion and other materialistic and naturalistic faith groups are happy that publicly funded schools exhibit a strong bias toward teaching the evolutionist model of origins and censoring facts in support of any other model. Materialistic and naturalistic dogma is being taught in public schools. This bias is not limited to schools--it seems to be present everywhere, and the courts have largely condoned it. Of course, it helps the cause of the Humanist religion when the ungodly liberal law-makers use every trick in the book to make sure that most judges are believers in the Humanist religion.

"I am convinced that the battle for humankind's future must be waged and won in the public school classroom by teachers who correctly perceive their role as the proselytizers of a new faith: a religion of humanity that recognizes and respects the spark of what theologians call divinity in every human being. These teachers must embody the same selfless dedication as the most rabid fundamentalist preachers, for they will be ministers of another sort, utilizing a classroom instead of a pulpit to convey humanist values in whatever subject they teach, regardless of the educational level preschool day care or large state university."
The Humanist, January/February 1983, "A Religion for a New Age."

Even most members of the news media exhibit a strong bias to present evolution as if it were fact. Evolution isn't science. In addition, the methods used for Gaining Consensus on Evolution are not honest. Everywhere, we see pressure tactics to get everyone to bow to the speculative rational-lie-zer's religion, Humanism, and their main dogma, evolution. The ACLU, someone said that stands for Anti-Christian Lawyer's Union, is always running around with a club to hit anyone who won't fall in line.

In February, 1997, the "New Mexico . . . Senate Education Committee approved a bill mandating adoption of the National Academy of Sciences, which include a dogmatic treatment of evolution." (World Magazine, March, 1997, p. 13).

In a Virginia school district, biology textbooks equate alternatives to the evolution model with astrology, fad-diets and pseudo-science. These textbooks take this stand even though, by every scientific test, evolution is pseudo-science. Evolution is non-science. It is religious dogma of the religion called Humanism, the State-sponsored religion that is now being taught in public schools using public money.

Even where the laws require that evolutionism is taught only as theory, actions of pressure groups like the ACLU often result in evolutionism being taught as if were or could be fact . . . while other models are censored. Most teachers persuasively present a very selective group of facts, meager and fictitious though they be, to support the evolutionist doctrine. At the same time, they censor the many conclusive facts that disprove evolutionism. If anyone looks objectively at all the facts, the idea of evolution is silly indeed. Believers in evolution do know in their heart of hearts, but they are in denial. They don't want to honor God as God. It's as simple as that. That's why, even if you were able to talk to them, they cannot be convinced. They want to believe what they want to be true. Only God can soften a heart that is hard. You are better off praying for them than arguing with them.

CENSORSHIP AND EVOLUTION
When Norris Anderson, evolutionism zealot and textbook writer, realized that there is absolutely no evidence to support Darwinism, he suggested that science texts be changed to give a true image of the actual scientific evidence. He said: "I saw that scientists close ranks to present a false image of scientific certainty." (World Magazine, March 1, 1997, p. 15). In this way, false science promotes evolutionism, one of the chief doctrines of Humanism, and false science also censors all opposing facts and ideas.

PROFESSORS OF BIOLOGY GAINING CONSENSUS ON EVOLUTION

Could any person who openly doubted evolutionism be hired as a professor of biology in most major universities? No! There is not an open atmosphere in these universities. They are not willing to consider any ideas outside of their own religion, Humanism. If any professor wants job security, that professor must adopt the philosophies the school dogmatically teaches. This is particularly true on the larger, better-paying campuses. In this way, consensus is gained through coercion.