click here to learn more about being redeemed from sin and set free to serve God in spirit and in truth. click here to learn more about holiness click here to learn more about being changed into the same image click here to learn more about sowing and reaping click here to learn more about the free gift of righteousness. click here to learn more about how faith gives us access to grace and grace does the works. click here to learn more about faith and how it comes. click here to learn more about acknowledging Jesus click here to learn more about how God speaks Who will you listen to?  Click here to learn more. click here to learn more about the pattern of God. click here to learn more about the pattern of God for individuals, marriage, and family. click here to learn more about the pattern of God for the local church click here to learn more about the Church universal
 
SeekFind Logo Menu

How To Respond To Anti-Science Accusations Against Christ

 

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. And don't forget where you are going. You get past the questions/attacks so you can proclaim the Gospel. It is the proclamation of the Gospel, not argumentation, that transforms minds. See Give Them the Gospel.

You are likely to hear this lie: "Churches come across as antagonistic to science." You are especially likely to hear this lie if you have children in the public schools or in a liberal "Christian" school.

Fabricated stories (evolutionism, old-Earthism, big-bangism, bibilcal-erroism, etc.) that are based on arbitrary assumptions (naturalism, materialism, uniformitarianism) and rationalizations are not science. Ask them if they have any observable proof of the fabricated stories (evolutionism, old-Earthism, big-bangism, bibilcal-erroism, etc.) that are based on arbitrary assumptions (naturalism, materialism, uniformitarianism) and rationalizations.

The simple way:

Every evidence that is used against God consists of made-up stories (lies), arbitrary assumptions (lies), or irrational statements (insanity). We have not followed cleverly designed made-up stories, arbitrary assumptions, or irrational statements. Rather, we follow the Living Christ, Who leads us and speaks the Utterances of absolute, genuine fullness of Life to us.

Whatever they come back with will consist of made-up stories (lies), arbitrary assumptions (lies), or irrational statements (insanity). This is true whether they say "Evolution is science," "There is no God," "God doesn't speak to you," "You are stupid," "You don't understand science," "I don't have enough evidence to believe," "There is no evidence for God," "The Bible has errors," or any other thing, so just say some variation of the following:

Thank you for providing an excellent example: Every evidence that is used against God consists of made-up stories (lies), arbitrary assumptions (lies), or irrational statements (insanity). We have not followed cleverly designed made-up stories, arbitrary assumptions, or irrational statements. Rather, we follow the Living Christ, Who leads us and speaks the Utterances of absolute, genuine fullness of Life to us. (example using this on an blog)

The more complex way:

Question it and then listen. Be gentle and give plenty of room to respond, but don't except nonsense as if it made sense. Don't embarrass the other person or get into an angry debate. They have probably been brainwashed and will be shocked that anyone would not just agree with them. They probably have never met an informed follower of Christ since many people who are following Christ don't even have enough compassion for their own children to learn about these things. The reason that you switch to neutral and into a listening mode is because the enemy of our souls has raised this attack to an emotional fever-pitch. A soft answer turns away wrath. If you have done your homework, then the truth will prevail. Keep in mind the real reason that you know that the person claiming, "Churches come across as antagonistic to science." is because they have been brainwashed and they want to fit in with the present evil ordered system. The system has been ordered by Satan and when they become a friend of this system they become an enemy of God, even if they wear the label, "Christian." Below are just a few examples of how the conversation may flow. Keep in mind that these are very compressed and leave out many of the things that you must do to maintain rapport with someone who is really emotional. Smile. Nod your head. Keep an open body language. Draw out each of these answers and listen with intent interest. When they can't answer, you can help them to keep from being embarrassed. Preface your questions with softening language. Instead of saying, "How are you defining the word, "science?" ask "I have heard people say this sort of thing before, and I always wonder how they are defining the word, "science." Could you help me understand? There are many ways to soften your questions and your statements. Rather than saying, "I disagree, and here is why..." ask a question in this way: "I understand what you are saying. Would you be willing to hear my reasoning for believing what the Bible says about this?" Read "How Do You Know that the Bible is Accurate?" Read "How Can We Know Anything?"

  • How are you defining the word "science?" (They probably won't even be able to answer this. You need to know the difference between operational science and forensic science and the strengths and weaknesses of each. From an exploration of this word, you can have a conversation that unveils that fact that the person making the claim that the church is anti-science or that churches come across as antagonistic to science is not a rational claim.)
    • Do you know the difference between operational science and forensic (historical) science?
    • How much do you know about how conclusions are drawn from scientifically controlled observations?
    • How do the observations confirm [insert the claim: evolution, an old earth, global warming, etc.]
      • Why are you more convinced that similarities between fossils of different kinds of animals point to evolution rather than pointing to a common designer and creator?
      • Why are there no transitional forms? **
        • Do you realize the claiming that they will eventually find transitional forms is an irrational form of argument known as an appeal to ignorance?
  • What scientific data have you personally seen that convinces you of [insert the claim: evolution, an old earth, global warming, etc.]
  • In order for evolution to take place, new innovative genetic information of the type needed for even the smallest advance in so-called molecules-to-man evolution would have to be added to the information already present in the cells.
    • Were you aware that after massive amounts of testing, no mechanism has ever been found that would possibly add new innovative genetic information of the type needed for even the smallest advance in so-called molecules-to-man evolution. Well-funded evolutionists have tried desperately and have come up with nothing. Nothing!
    • Were you aware that no observation has been made that shows that new innovative genetic information of the type needed for even the smallest advance in so-called molecules-to-man evolution is ever added?
    • Were you aware that The Second Law of Thermodynamics always has been shown to work to destroy information rather than add it?
    • Were you aware that no more complexity has ever been added to anything?
    • In the light of these facts, how would you consider that a theory that goes against all these facts of science is scientific?
  • We could go on with many questions that need to be asked, but it is more important that you study the information on this page: "How can we know anything about anything?" and then Read "How Do You Know that the Bible is Accurate?" Read "How Can We Know Anything?"
  • From here you can read the many pages here: *

The following diagram makes it plain that every instance of supposed increase of new innovative genetic information of the type needed for even the smallest advance in so-called molecules-to-man evolution that is used by Evolution's evangelists is an example of NO increase in new innovative genetic information of the type needed for even the smallest advance in so-called molecules-to-man evolution.  Evolutionist's claims for adding information fall into three categories.  These are the 3 Rs of Evolution: Rearrange information, Remove information, and Ruin information.

The 3 Rs of Evolution: Rearrange information, Remove information, and Ruin information.

 

Using an analogy of a train, Evolution hopes to go from Missouri in Central U.S. to California.  However, the train is going the wrong direction toward New York, with each small change being the result of a loss of information or simply a rearrangement of what is already there.  The evolution train’s a-comin’The evolution train goes the wrong way on the map.

** "What makes the question complex is that in place of the countless thousands of transitional forms expected (as Darwin logically indicated should be found, and anticipated would be found in future), there exists at any point in time a handful of candidates, i.e. fossils put forward as transitional forms by evolutionary proponents. [Note: By 'transitional forms' is meant here fossils showing intermediate stages between major evolutionary transitions, i.e. from one kind of creature to a wholly different kind. For example, stages in the supposed transition of a walking reptile to a flying bird, nothing which creationists could regard as variation/speciation within a kind. Some evolutionists argue that we have countless thousands of transitional fossils, but they empty the term 'transitional fossil' of any content really meaningful for the creation-evolution debate. They define a fossil as 'transitional' in the same sense that a car is 'transitional' between a unicycle and a truck. That is not in view here.] Creationists by definition would argue that there are none, so to evolutionists this is seen as 'proof'. From a creation perspective, though, consider the following:" Go to http://creation.com/missing-links-parade for the rest of this article.

"When evolution is seen as a storytelling game rather than a serious attempt at scientific explanation, it suddenly makes sense."

Watch these videos:



Author/Compiler
Last updated: Sep, 2013
 
 




Bread Crumbs

 
Home     >   Meaning     >   Christian Witness     >   Answers for Witness     >   Stories Versus Revelation     >   Creation, Flood, Etc.     >   How To Respond

Main

Foundations

Home

Meaning

Bible

Dictionary

History

Toons & Vids

Quotations

Similar

How To Respond To Anti-Science Accusations Against Christ

Doesn't All the Evidence Point to Millions/Billions of Years and Evolution?

The Fallacy of Methods for Determining the Age of the Earth

Evidence For The World-Wide Flood Of Noah And The Ark

Scientific Method Uncovers Facts that Support Creation, NOT Evolution

Big Bang is Baloney

Charles Lyell, Charles Darwin, plus Gullible Christians and Students

The Paluxy fossil human footprints

Video: So-Called Evolution's Origin Quickly Debunked

What is the Real Question?

Challenge:

Where did all the people in the land of Nod come from?

Help in explaining how there came to be so many races

Challenge: Evolutionary Value and a Demonstrable Biological Explanation

Lying claim: Morality existed long before religion.

Dinosaur Eggs

The Simple Cell?

Dinosaurs In The Bible

Questions and Answers: Is Distant Starlight A Problem For Creationists Or Evolutionists?

The Human Genome And DNA

Dinosaur Tracks

If there was no time before the creation, that is, time was created, then how could God cause the universe to come into existence.

The Bias Of Scientists And Other Humans

The Ear

The Theory of Everything

Is Creation a Viable Model of Origins?


Recent

Home

Answer to Critic

Appeal to Possibility

Circular Reasoning

Argument to the Future

Insignificant Cause

Word Magic

Love Between a Man and Woman

Author/Compiler

Colossians 2

Righteousness & Holiness

Don't Compromise

Sin

Proof by Atheism

Scriptures About Marriage

Genuine Authority

The Reason for Rejecting Truth

Witness on the Internet

Flaky Human Reasoning

How Do You Know?



Featured


The Real Purpose of the Church

The Real Purpose of Life

From Glory to Glory

REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT

REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT

How to be Led by God

How to Witness

Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality

Holiness & Mind/Soul

Redemption: Free From Sin

Real Reality

Stories Versus Revelation

Understanding Logic

Logical Fallacies

Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty?

How Can We Know Anything?

God's Word

God's Process

God's Pattern

Mind Designed to Relate to God

Answers for the Confused

Fossil Record Says: "Creation"

Avoid These Pitfalls

Public School's Religion

Twisting Science

Evolutionism

Public School Failures

Twisting History


How can we know anything about anything? That's the real question

more info: mouseover or click

The complexity of Gods Way understood in a single diagram
Obey your flesh and descend into darkness