|How To Respond To Anti-Science Accusations Against Christ|
If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. And don't forget where you are going. You get past the questions/attacks so you can proclaim the Gospel. It is the proclamation of the Gospel, not argumentation, that transforms minds. See Give Them the Gospel.
You are likely to hear this lie: "Churches come across as antagonistic to science." You are especially likely to hear this lie if you have children in the public schools or in a liberal "Christian" school.
Fabricated stories (evolutionism, old-Earthism, big-bangism, bibilcal-erroism, etc.) that are based on arbitrary assumptions (naturalism, materialism, uniformitarianism) and rationalizations are not science. Ask them if they have any observable proof of the fabricated stories (evolutionism, old-Earthism, big-bangism, bibilcal-erroism, etc.) that are based on arbitrary assumptions (naturalism, materialism, uniformitarianism) and rationalizations.
The simple way:
Whatever they come back with will consist of made-up stories (lies), arbitrary assumptions (lies), or irrational statements (insanity). This is true whether they say "Evolution is science," "There is no God," "God doesn't speak to you," "You are stupid," "You don't understand science," "I don't have enough evidence to believe," "There is no evidence for God," "The Bible has errors," or any other thing, so just say some variation of the following:
The more complex way:
Question it and then listen. Be gentle and give plenty of room to respond, but don't except nonsense as if it made sense. Don't embarrass the other person or get into an angry debate. They have probably been brainwashed and will be shocked that anyone would not just agree with them. They probably have never met an informed follower of Christ since many people who are following Christ don't even have enough compassion for their own children to learn about these things. The reason that you switch to neutral and into a listening mode is because the enemy of our souls has raised this attack to an emotional fever-pitch. A soft answer turns away wrath. If you have done your homework, then the truth will prevail. Keep in mind the real reason that you know that the person claiming, "Churches come across as antagonistic to science." is because they have been brainwashed and they want to fit in with the present evil ordered system. The system has been ordered by Satan and when they become a friend of this system they become an enemy of God, even if they wear the label, "Christian." Below are just a few examples of how the conversation may flow. Keep in mind that these are very compressed and leave out many of the things that you must do to maintain rapport with someone who is really emotional. Smile. Nod your head. Keep an open body language. Draw out each of these answers and listen with intent interest. When they can't answer, you can help them to keep from being embarrassed. Preface your questions with softening language. Instead of saying, "How are you defining the word, "science?" ask "I have heard people say this sort of thing before, and I always wonder how they are defining the word, "science." Could you help me understand? There are many ways to soften your questions and your statements. Rather than saying, "I disagree, and here is why..." ask a question in this way: "I understand what you are saying. Would you be willing to hear my reasoning for believing what the Bible says about this?" Read "How Do You Know that the Bible is Accurate?" Read "How Can We Know Anything?"
The following diagram makes it plain that every instance of supposed increase of new innovative genetic information of the type needed for even the smallest advance in so-called molecules-to-man evolution that is used by Evolution's evangelists is an example of NO increase in new innovative genetic information of the type needed for even the smallest advance in so-called molecules-to-man evolution. Evolutionist's claims for adding information fall into three categories. These are the 3 Rs of Evolution: Rearrange information, Remove information, and Ruin information.
Using an analogy of a train, Evolution hopes to go from Missouri in Central U.S. to California. However, the train is going the wrong direction toward New York, with each small change being the result of a loss of information or simply a rearrangement of what is already there. The evolution train’s a-comin’
** "What makes the question complex is that in place of the countless thousands of transitional forms expected (as Darwin logically indicated should be found, and anticipated would be found in future), there exists at any point in time a handful of candidates, i.e. fossils put forward as transitional forms by evolutionary proponents. [Note: By 'transitional forms' is meant here fossils showing intermediate stages between major evolutionary transitions, i.e. from one kind of creature to a wholly different kind. For example, stages in the supposed transition of a walking reptile to a flying bird, nothing which creationists could regard as variation/speciation within a kind. Some evolutionists argue that we have countless thousands of transitional fossils, but they empty the term 'transitional fossil' of any content really meaningful for the creation-evolution debate. They define a fossil as 'transitional' in the same sense that a car is 'transitional' between a unicycle and a truck. That is not in view here.] Creationists by definition would argue that there are none, so to evolutionists this is seen as 'proof'. From a creation perspective, though, consider the following:" Go to http://creation.com/missing-links-parade for the rest of this article.
Watch these videos:
Last updated: Sep, 2013
Toons & Vids
How To Respond To Anti-Science Accusations Against Christ
Doesn't All the Evidence Point to Millions/Billions of Years and Evolution?
The Fallacy of Methods for Determining the Age of the Earth
Evidence For The World-Wide Flood Of Noah And The Ark
Scientific Method Uncovers Facts that Support Creation, NOT Evolution
Big Bang is Baloney
Charles Lyell, Charles Darwin, plus Gullible Christians and Students
The Paluxy fossil human footprints
Video: So-Called Evolution's Origin Quickly Debunked
What is the Real Question?
Where did all the people in the land of Nod come from?
Help in explaining how there came to be so many races
Challenge: Evolutionary Value and a Demonstrable Biological Explanation
Lying claim: Morality existed long before religion.
The Simple Cell?
Dinosaurs In The Bible
Questions and Answers: Is Distant Starlight A Problem For Creationists Or Evolutionists?
The Human Genome And DNA
If there was no time before the creation, that is, time was created, then how could God cause the universe to come into existence.
The Bias Of Scientists And Other Humans
The Theory of Everything
Is Creation a Viable Model of Origins?
Answer to Critic
Appeal to Possibility
Argument to the Future
Love Between a Man and Woman
Righteousness & Holiness
Proof by Atheism
Scriptures About Marriage
The Reason for Rejecting Truth
Witness on the Internet
Flaky Human Reasoning
How Do You Know?
The Real Purpose of the Church
The Real Purpose of Life
From Glory to Glory
REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT
REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT
How to be Led by God
How to Witness
Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality
Holiness & Mind/Soul
Redemption: Free From Sin
Stories Versus Revelation
Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty?
How Can We Know Anything?
Mind Designed to Relate to God
Answers for the Confused
Fossil Record Says: "Creation"
Avoid These Pitfalls
Public School's Religion
Public School Failures