|Incomplete Comparison Fallacy|
Incomplete Comparison Fallacy
Incomplete comparison is one of the many smokescreens that are used to cover the fact that the reasoning is based on one of the three fallacies of Agrippa's trilemma. Whenever a logical fallacy is committed, the fallacy has its roots in Agrippa's trilemma. All human thought (without Divine revelation) is based on one of three unhappy possibilities. These three possibilities are infinite regress, circular reasoning, or axiomatic thinking. This problem is known as Agrippa's trilemma. Some have claimed that only logic and math can be known without Divine revelation; however, that is not true. There is no reason to trust either logic or math without Divine revelation. Science is also limited to the pragmatic because of the weakness on human reasoning, which is known as Agrippa's trilemma.
The Incomplete Comparison Fallacy occurs when insufficient information is provided to make a complete comparison, yet a comparison is proposed. The fact that a comparison is proposed isn't necessarily a fallacy. The fallacy would be in being unable to explain the difference and finish making the comparison. While some things are easy to compare because they are very simple, with more complex things, giving the entire comparison on every level and regarding every facet may not be possible. Incomplete knowledge is not a fallacy unless you claim to have all knowledge.
Examples of the Incomplete Comparison Fallacy
Sandy is comparing freedom as an Atheist to freedom in some religion. What religion. Was Sandy a Christian? If so, did Sandy ever come to know Christ personally in a way that the Holy Spirit was leading him moment by moment? What is Sandy free from now as opposed to before? What is Sandy now free to do that Sandy could not do previously?
At this point, Sandy's statement is not necessarily a fallacy. What Sandy is thinking or implying is likely to be a fallacy. If Sandy were to try to answer the questions to fill in the blanks, some fallacies would probably show up.
At this point, Rocky hasn't really committed a fallacy, but his statement leaves many questions unanswered. What has he been freed from? What has he been freed to? What does it mean to accept Christ as his Savior? If Rocky has really been set free, then he has been set free from slavery to Satan. He still has a sinful nature, but he is no longer slave to it to obey its desires. He is free to know Christ personally and to have Christ direct him and teach him moment by moment. He is free to acknowledge the Voice of his Creator and to respond in submission, receiving the free gift of faith in the process. He is free to obey by the grace that comes when God's faith is given to him. He is free to have righteousness lead to holiness. He is free to stand in the Presence of God and experience His love. This is just the tip of the iceberg.
What are we comparing evolution to? Does evolution mean the entire Big-Bang-Billions-of-Years-No-Flood-Molecules-to-Man story, just the Molecules-to-Man story, the changes from generation to generation in living things, the equivocation that mixes all of these into a single definition of the word, "evolution," or something else? What is the definition of the word, "scientific." Does it mean the scientific method? Does it mean naturalistic and materialistic assumptions? Does it mean the bandwagon approach of the majority who are in control of scientific funding? It may be an equivocation between all of these meanings. The statement is meaningless as it stands.
Last updated: Sep, 2014
Toons & Vids
Logical Fallacy of Faulty Comparison
Incomplete Comparison Fallacy
Inconsistent Comparison Fallacy
Package Deal Fallacy
The Logical Fallacy of Equating Opposites
Ignoring Differences / Denying Differences / Overlooking Differences / False Equivalence / Ignoring Differences / Greyness Fallacy / False Equivalence
Equating Opposites / Ignoring Differences:
Logical Fallacy of False or Faulty Analogy / Weak Analogy / Bad Analogy / Appeal to the Moon
Logical Fallacy of Extended Analogy
Logical Fallacy of Projection
Logical Fallacy of Reductio Ad Hitlerum / Ad Nazium / Hitler Card
Logical Fallacy of Mistaken Identity
Logical Fallacy of Distinction Without a Difference / Phantom Distinction / Sham Distinctions
Answer to Critic
Appeal to Possibility
Argument to the Future
Love Between a Man and Woman
Righteousness & Holiness
Proof by Atheism
Scriptures About Marriage
The Reason for Rejecting Truth
Witness on the Internet
Flaky Human Reasoning
How Do You Know?
The Real Purpose of the Church
The Real Purpose of Life
From Glory to Glory
REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT
REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT
How to be Led by God
How to Witness
Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality
Holiness & Mind/Soul
Redemption: Free From Sin
Stories Versus Revelation
Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty?
How Can We Know Anything?
Mind Designed to Relate to God
Answers for the Confused
Fossil Record Says: "Creation"
Avoid These Pitfalls
Public School's Religion
Public School Failures