![]() |
![]() |
Just World Hypothesis |
Just World HypothesisThe just world hypothesis is one of the many smokescreens that are used to cover the fact that the reasoning is based on one of the three fallacies of Agrippa's trilemma. Whenever a logical fallacy is committed, the fallacy has its roots in Agrippa's trilemma. All human thought (without Divine revelation) is based on one of three unhappy possibilities. These three possibilities are infinite regress, circular reasoning, or axiomatic thinking. This problem is known as Agrippa's trilemma. Some have claimed that only logic and math can be known without Divine revelation; however, that is not true. There is no reason to trust either logic or math without Divine revelation. Science is also limited to the pragmatic because of the weakness on human reasoning, which is known as Agrippa's trilemma. The Just World Hypothesis occurs when an assumption is made that the world is just and what happens to us is justice--according to our own definitions of "just" and "justice." This is a statistical fallacy of looking at a small sample of the eternal continuum. Ultimately, there is justice. We know that by Divine revelation. However, there is much injustice along the way, so someone who does good may have some very bad experiences. Examples of the Just World Hypothesis
There are many other reasons that God allows problems to come into our lives. One is to test us and prepare us of coming responsibility.
God does have His reasons. We may not always understand it, but He has a different viewpoint than we have. He can see across the ages, the end from the beginning. He knows everything that is going on and what it is going to take to finish the project. Author/Compiler Last updated: Sep, 2014 ![]() Bread Crumbs Main Foundations Home Meaning Bible Dictionary History Toons & Vids Quotations Similar
Flat Earth Navigation Syndrome Jingoism Logical Fallacy of Chronological Snobbery Logical Fallacy of Retrospective Determinism Essentializing Fallacy Logical Fallacy of Presentism Logical Fallacy of Proof by Appeal to Naturalism Logical Fallacy of Proof by Appeal to Materialism Logical Fallacy of Proof by Uniformitarianism Logical Fallacy of Proof by Agnosticism Logical Fallacy of Proof by Atheism Logical Fallacy of Proof by Relativism / Escape to Relativism Logical Fallacy of Appeal to Rationalism "If God Exists" Fallacy Logical Fallacy of Scientism Finish the Job Fallacy Concorde Fallacy / Sunk Cost Fallacy Political Correctness Fallacy Just World Hypothesis Recent
Home Answer to Critic Appeal to Possibility Circular Reasoning Argument to the Future Insignificant Cause Word Magic Love Between a Man and Woman Author/Compiler Colossians 2 Righteousness & Holiness Don't Compromise Sin Proof by Atheism Scriptures About Marriage Genuine Authority The Reason for Rejecting Truth Witness on the Internet Flaky Human Reasoning How Do You Know? Featured
The Real Purpose of the Church The Real Purpose of Life From Glory to Glory REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT How to be Led by God How to Witness Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality Holiness & Mind/Soul Redemption: Free From Sin Real Reality Stories Versus Revelation Understanding Logic Logical Fallacies Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty? How Can We Know Anything? God's Word God's Process God's Pattern Mind Designed to Relate to God Answers for the Confused Fossil Record Says: "Creation" Avoid These Pitfalls Public School's Religion Twisting Science Evolutionism Public School Failures Twisting History |
![]() |
![]() |