It seems that if you can dazzle the editors with a few calculus equations, you can get any evolutionary tall tale published.  The popular Darwinian idea of game theory as an explanation for animal behavior is riddled with the personification fallacy.  Clearly the animals are not consciously playing games, so who is?  Mother Nature?  Charles Darwin?  The spirit of the coyote?  It's a ridiculous structure to build on a materialist foundation.  It's also so versatile that it explains opposite phenomena equally well, so how is anyone supposed to test it? ~ http://creationsafaris.com/crev1001.htm  ~ Current News: http://crev.info