Breeding experiments have done much to debunk the evolutionary dogma, haven't they?
The Many breeding experiments (at huge cost to taxpayers) were conducted to prove that micro evolution will lead to macro evolution over time. They have confirmed just the opposite. No matter how they try, they find that no information is added to genetic material (which is the real claim of evolutionism) by random events. Information comes from intelligence--in the case of the creation, unimaginable intelligence. Evolution isn't science.
Every chance mutation has a negative net effect. Survival of the fittest will only produce micro evolution, but never a new kind of living thing. Random events can't add organization and information to that which is stored in the DNA molecule. Survival of the fittest will only select from the information already in the gene pool. It has no power to add information to the gene pool. Random events don't add to information in the gene pool either. Random events always remove information. This is one example of the enormity of the improbable, unworkable hypothesis. Evolution is a prime example of a politically correct hypothesis, which must be defended even though it is preposterous.
Evolution isn't science.
Author/Compiler: Bob Stenson (unless otherwise noted)
Last updated: 2008-10-18 08:35:14
|