If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.

Evolution's Obvious Conflicts

Evolution conflicts with obvious facts. Evolution conflicts with what can easily be observed. Evolution conflicts with such fundamental laws of science as the Second Law of Thermodynamics.

The Evolutionists will tell you a half truth about the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The Evolutionists will tell the half truth: "The Second Law of Thermodynamics only applies to isolated systems, so it's not relevant to evolution, because the Earth is an open system." This is a clever lie. Here is the part of the truth that they are withholding: the Second Law of Thermodynamics was derived using theoretical isolated systems, but it applies to all systems, and can only be overcome locally and temporarily in open systems when stringent conditions are met. Not only that, but we are not talking about the Earth. The Earth is just a subsystem of a much larger system called the Universe. The Universe is an isolated system. Evolutionists claim that Evolution took place in this isolated system, but the Second Law of Thermodynamics tells us that their story is a myth.

More information on the Second Law of Thermodynamics can be found here & here & here & here & here

Evolutionists need some method by which complexity and order could have possibly developed by Naturalistic means--as if telling an uncheckable lie makes the lie true. But they can't even come up with an uncheckable lie. So far they have come up with wild tales like the following: "Whence life complexity? Give evolutionists all the carbon-based molecules they want: will they get life to form and evolve? Will the amino acids form proteins (see online book) that can evolve into complex life? Michael Lynch and Ariel Fernandez, scientists at the University of Chicago, reported PhysOrg began with proteins, and then speculated that "Errors in protein structure sparked evolution of biological complexity." That's right: complex life is the result of mistakes. This idea was published in Nature.¹ "... "This new idea is actually un-Darwinian. In a nutshell, PhysOrg said, "random introduction of errors into proteins, rather than traditional natural selection, may have boosted the evolution of biological complexity." How can that be? Is there any complex system that gets better with the introduction of random errors?"... "Help your local pre-creationist friend at the university become a full-fledged one. Give him or her the following books:

• Nonsense of a High Order: The Confused and Illusory World of the Atheist by Moshe Averick. Chapter 3 gives a good summary of the hopelessness of evolutionary theories on the origin of life, with ample quotes from leading evolutionists and origin-of-life researchers themselves.
• Signature in the Cell by Stephen C. Meyer.
• Genetic Entropy and the Mystery of the Genome by Dr. John C. Sanford. Fascinating and convincing evidence (from a geneticist) on why mutations will never, ever lead to increased fitness-in fact, the human genome is disintegrating due to mutations.
• The Nature of Nature by numerous authors on both sides of the design question.
• The Programming of Life by Don Johnson." (Source: CREV - read more)

Evolutionists are forced to defend their hypothesis against all the obvious observations. As with most things that are based on rationalized speculation, the more speculative the assertion, the more violently it must be defended. Evolutionists are constantly defending their assertions against the obvious observations of science. When they see a law of science like the Second Law of Thermodynamics, they find themselves making up an unobservable law that works against the Second Law of Thermodynamics, but this unobservable law cannot be disproved, since it cannot be observed. You see, the hypothesis of evolution proves the unobservable law. And, of course, the Evolutionist needs to become violently opposed to anything that would refute this insanity. The Evolutionist insists that anyone who doesn't accept this nonsense is not fit to be a scientist-they are evil and dangerous. The reality is that Evolutionism is a dangerous cult that has spawned such movements as Nazism and Communism, killing more innocent people than all other cults combined. And that includes the cultist activities of the Holy Roman Empire.

Ungodly people are forced to hold on tightly to some basic presuppositions.  These presuppositions are just simple-minded assumptions.  They are filters and a way to censor out any information that supports the existence of God.  They set up a web of rules to filter out God.  They will only accept those things that conform to Naturalism, materialism, and uniformitarianism.  Naturalism claims that God does nothing.  Materialism claims that there is no God or spiritual realm.  Uniformitarianism claims that there was not creation and that there was no violent worldwide flood, as the Bible and numerous other historical accounts record.  Whatever they observe that does not conform to this complex filter is censored.  The way that it is censored can take several forms.  The ungodly may boldly proclaim that, though the data appears to support God's version and refute the version of the ungodly, yet it still must be interpreted to mean just the opposite of what it does mean.  A backup method that ungodly people use is to prophecy that in the future, science will be able to explain what they see as an anomaly.  If that fails, they will hide the data, set it aside, or lie to keep the public from knowing the truth.  The data clearly demolishes the story of the ungodly and clearly supports the reality of the Creator God, His Bible, and His abiding Presence in His people.  When confronted with the obvious, a closed-minded ungodly person says, "I can't understand it."  They are willingly ignorant because they refuse to hold God in their knowledge.  The reality is that these people, for whatever reason, don't what to know the Creator.  They don't want to truly know Jesus, their Creator.