![]() |
![]() |
Why Won't Anyone Supply Solid Proof For Evolution? |
If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.
No Solid Proof For EvolutionSome have stated that science cannot prove anything. Let's accept that premise for the sake of argument. Then, why do we teach one theory and disallow the teaching of another theory when both theories are using the exact same scientific observations to support their theories. The one that is being disallowed has far fewer problems with the observations in the scientific observations. In other words, the explanation that the Almighty, Eternal God created everything from nothing is six literal days a few thousand years ago is much more in agreement with what we can observe. The explanation that matter always existed and somehow organized itself by natural process into what we have today is much less in agreement with what we can observe. The explanation that all matter suddenly came into existence from nothing and then somehow organized itself by natural process into what we have today is also much less in agreement with what we can observe. Both naturalistic stories violate basic laws of science that have been observed repeatedly and that have no known exceptions. So, why are the two inferior explanations preferred? Interestingly, a while ago, I wrote the story of how I discovered that there is no proof for evolutionism as taught in public schools. After I wrote that, a few people threw insults at me, and some tried to change the subject, but no one offered proof for Darwinism. If there were proof for Darwinian evolutionism, people have offered huge amounts of money to anyone who could give proof of Darwinian evolutionism. If evolutionism were a valid scientific theory (like the laws of thermodynamics or the inverse square law of gravity), then there would be the same type of proof available, but no one has ever brought forth any proof--only flimflam. No one has ever seen anything that actually proves evolutionism. In answer, an evolutionist will say something like, "Science actually cannot prove anything. It can only show that one solution is more likely than another." Then, that same person wants everyone to swallow the lie of evolution when it is so unlikely that it is basically impossible. Evolutionism is a story about history. Evolutionists can show some things and tell stories about them. The things don't speak for themselves. In fact, all of creation speaks of the Creator God. Evolutionist's stories are not science and they are not proof of anything. The more that we learn about creation, the less believable Evolutionist's stories are and the more convoluted their logic becomes. The presuppositions of the ungodly are just simple-minded assumptions. They are filters and a way to censor out any evidence that supports the existence of God. They set up a web of rules to filter out God. They will only accept those things that conform to Naturalism, materialism, and uniformitarianism. Naturalism claims that God does nothing. Materialism claims that there is no God or spiritual realm. Uniformitarianism claims that there was not creation and that there was no violent worldwide flood, as the Bible and numerous other historical accounts record. Whatever they observe that does not conform to this complex filter is censored. The way that it is censored can take several forms. The ungodly may boldly proclaim that, though the data appears to support God's version and refute the version of the ungodly, yet it still must be interpreted to mean just the opposite of what it does mean. A backup method that ungodly people use is to prophecy that in the future, science will be able to explain what they see as an anomaly. If that fails, they will hide the data, set it aside, or lie to keep the public from knowing the truth. The data clearly demolishes the story of the ungodly and clearly supports the reality of the Creator God, His Bible, and His abiding Presence in His people. When confronted with the obvious, a closed-minded ungodly person says, "I can't understand it." They are willingly ignorant because they refuse to hold God in their knowledge. The reality is that these people, for whatever reason, don't what to know the Creator. They don't want to truly know Jesus, their Creator.
Astronomy
Bible, God, theology
Biology (creation vs evolution)
Creation: relevance to Christianity, society and science
Geology, the Flood, the Ice Age and the age of the earth
History
Paleontology
Author/Compiler Last updated: Jun, 2013 ![]() Bread Crumbs Main Foundations Home Meaning Bible Dictionary History Toons & Vids Quotations Similar
Why Won't Anyone Supply Solid Proof For Evolution? Can you show us all of the proof of evolution? Recent
Home Answer to Critic Appeal to Possibility Circular Reasoning Argument to the Future Insignificant Cause Word Magic Love Between a Man and Woman Author/Compiler Colossians 2 Righteousness & Holiness Don't Compromise Sin Proof by Atheism Scriptures About Marriage Genuine Authority The Reason for Rejecting Truth Witness on the Internet Flaky Human Reasoning How Do You Know? Featured
The Real Purpose of the Church The Real Purpose of Life From Glory to Glory REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT How to be Led by God How to Witness Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality Holiness & Mind/Soul Redemption: Free From Sin Real Reality Stories Versus Revelation Understanding Logic Logical Fallacies Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty? How Can We Know Anything? God's Word God's Process God's Pattern Mind Designed to Relate to God Answers for the Confused Fossil Record Says: "Creation" Avoid These Pitfalls Public School's Religion Twisting Science Evolutionism Public School Failures Twisting History |
![]() |
![]() |