Equivocation
E*quiv`o*ca"tion, n. The use of expressions susceptible of a double signification, with a purpose to mislead.

Equivocation is one of the great tools of evolutionists and liberal thinkers everywhere. An example is the game that evolutionists play with the term, evolution, itself. They use the logical error of equivocation between the two meanings of the term, evolution, to try to sell evolutionism to the masses. In this way, they are able to fool some people.  Evolution, however, isn't science.

Evolution, meaning the minor adaptations that occur within a certain kind of animal or plant? This is a scientific reality with which no one argues.

Evolution, meaning the development of all life and matter by purely random means? That's a totally different matter. This definition of evolution is nonsense. In fact, evolution of this second definition is impossible to believe since scientific knowledge has increased. It would violate proven laws of science, including the first and second laws of thermodynamics.

When evolutionists imply that agreement to the first obvious meaning of the word, evolution, compels students to agree to the second doubtful meaning, they use false logic known as equivocation. Evolution isn't science.

When evolutionist teachers tie grades to this agreement, they use the age-old method of persuasion known as coercion.

Both mental loops and coercion have been highly effective methods for evolutionists, haven't they?