Logical Fallacy of Necessity / Felacia Necassitas

The fallacy of necessity is a formal fallacy that covers up the problem when reasoning is based on one of the three fallacies of Agrippa's trilemma. Whenever a logical fallacy is committed, the fallacy has its roots in Agrippa's trilemma. All human thought (without Divine revelation) is based on one of three unhappy possibilities. These three possibilities are infinite regress, circular reasoning, or axiomatic thinking. This problem is known as Agrippa's trilemma. Some have claimed that only logic and math can be known without Divine revelation; however, that is not true. There is no reason to trust either logic or math without Divine revelation. Science is also limited to the pragmatic because of the weakness on human reasoning, which is known as Agrippa's trilemma.

The logical fallacy of necessity / felacia necassitas occurs when the conclusion of a syllogism indicates necessity, but this same necessity is not stated in both premises.

Examples of the Logical Fallacy of Necessity / Felacia Necassitas

"A person who follows Christ, necessarily is led by Christ.

Bill seems to be a person who follows Christ.

Therefore, Bill is necessarily led by Christ."

Bill is not necessarily led by Christ unless Bill is necessarily a person who follows Christ.

"Faith necessarily comes by hearing God in submission to Him and reverence toward Him.

Al thinks that he hears God’s voice.

Therefore, Al faith necessarily comes to Al."

Faith doesn’t necessarily come to Al just because Al thinks he hears God’s Voice. Al must actually wait until he hears God’s Voice.