Australopithecus Afarensis, or Lucy--The Difference Between Science and Fantasy?
If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.
Lucy, Australopithecus Afarensis
The Evolutionists tell sad lies about Australopithecus africanus.
A dedicated evolutionist will accept just about anything to prove evolution. They have eliminated creation without examination of the issue. A person who is willingly ignorant will hide his or her eyes from the truth and never realize that they are doing it. This reference can't really help them. This is written for the believer in Christ who has been lied to by the Evolutionists. "If anyone is so mentally constituted as to feel that this "completes a human evolutionary chain," I am sure that nothing I could say would discourage that person." Professor Marvin L. Lubenow Fact versus fiction: the recent Ethiopian fossils
A dedicated Evolutionist may accuse you of either lacking research skills or being despicable if you site a creation science website. The Evolutionist thinks that he or she is into science, but the Evolutionists presuppositions are so strong that they cannot see. They are blind. Everything looks, to them, like Evolution. They cannot bear to think of the Almighty God Who created everything.
In 2006, Creationsafaris posted this: When you scrape away the hype and artistic license, most of the details of the actual bones seem to back up criticisms by creationists that this is nothing more than an extinct ape. Read More
In 2009, more facts have come in, and this appeared on the site: "Mr. Huxley, I am a man created in the image of God, and you are an evolved mammal. Everything you do revolves around eating and mating. Tell me, why should I believe anything you say?" Read More
This 2009 article gets to the core of the problem--here is a small quote: Evidence can be badly misinterpreted, as any lawyer knows. Read More
