|Neanderthal Man Does Not Support Evolution|
If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.
You can fool some of the people all of the time and all of the people some of the time. Every time we turn around, the scientists are changing their minds about neanderthal man. They can do this because they have changed the meaning of the word, science. Science used to mean knowledge. Scientists used to have constraint. Now, they tell stories. They are creative story-tellers. There is another name for creative story-tellers: liars.
One day, the scientists tell this story. One day, they tell us that the chromosomes match those of apes, but not those of humans. The next day, the scientists tell us that Mr. Neanderthal Man is totally human. The only reason for the reversal is because it's all based on a creative story about some fossils that have been found. And they call it science. That is a shame.
The so-called Neanderthal Man is well within the diversity that can be found in the modern human genome.
The dating methods used are highly questionable from a purely observational and logical standpoint--it's highly unlikely that the bones are as old as some scientists try to make them out to be. All the excitement is over a rational-lies-zation, but it kept some poor evolutionists employed, didn't it?
This is another example that shows that Evolutionists have exchanged story-telling for science. They use science, but only to give unwarranted credibility to their stories. Their stories are simply stories. They prove nothing except that the human mind can lie.
Paleoanthropology: Neanderthal firemen: A complete reversal of thinking about Neanderthals has been going on for some time now (09/22/2010, 05/08/2010, 09/23/2008). PhysOrg added more fuel to the idea that Neanderthals were not "dimwitted brutes as often portrayed," but smart, organized and successful, able to control use of fire for 400,000 years in the evolutionary timescale. That was one surprise in a paper in PNAS mentioned in the article. (read more)
The assumptions of the ungodly become filters that filter out any information that supports the existence of God. Ungodly people set up a web of rules to filter out God. They will only accept those things that conform to Naturalism, materialism, and uniformitarianism. Naturalism claims that God does nothing. Materialism claims that there is no God or spiritual realm. Uniformitarianism claims that there was not creation and that there was no violent worldwide flood, as the Bible and numerous other historical accounts record. Whatever they observe that does not conform to this complex filter is censored. The way that it is censored can take several forms. The ungodly may boldly proclaim that, though the data appears to support God's version and refute the version of the ungodly, yet it still must be interpreted to mean just the opposite of what it does mean. A backup method that ungodly people use is to prophecy that in the future, science will be able to explain what they see as an anomaly. If that fails, they will hide the data, set it aside, or lie to keep the public from knowing the truth. The data clearly demolishes the story of the ungodly and clearly supports the reality of the Creator God, His Bible, and His abiding Presence in His people. When confronted with the obvious, a closed-minded ungodly person says, "I can't understand it." They are willingly ignorant because they refuse to hold God in their knowledge. The reality is that these people, for whatever reason, don't what to know the Creator. They don't want to truly know Jesus, their Creator.
Last updated: Jun, 2013
Toons & Vids
Science Shows Us That There Are No Transitional Forms, Disproving Evolutionism's Stories
Evolution Has Long Been Debunked. Evolutionists Will Not Let Go Because They Don't Want God.
Archaeopteryx was not a transitional form
What part did zeal play in the misrepresentation of Ramapithecus?
Why wasn't the Nebraska Man an example of a transitional form?
Why was Java Man not evidence for evolution?
How did Homo Erectus prove to be another example of evolutionistic wishful thinking?
How did Homo Habilis prove the weakness of scientists in jumping to conclusions?
How did scientists withhold facts to give a false impression regarding Australopithecine?
Neanderthal Man Does Not Support Evolution
How did the creativity of scientists and artists lead to the Cro-Magnon Man error?
Australopithecus Afarensis, or Lucy--The Difference Between Science and Fantasy?
What can we expect in the future from those who are committed to evolution as a dogma?
Answer to Critic
Appeal to Possibility
Argument to the Future
Love Between a Man and Woman
Righteousness & Holiness
Proof by Atheism
Scriptures About Marriage
The Reason for Rejecting Truth
Witness on the Internet
Flaky Human Reasoning
How Do You Know?
The Real Purpose of the Church
The Real Purpose of Life
From Glory to Glory
REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT
REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT
How to be Led by God
How to Witness
Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality
Holiness & Mind/Soul
Redemption: Free From Sin
Stories Versus Revelation
Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty?
How Can We Know Anything?
Mind Designed to Relate to God
Answers for the Confused
Fossil Record Says: "Creation"
Avoid These Pitfalls
Public School's Religion
Public School Failures