Logical Fallacy of Audiatur Et Altera Pars / Failure to State Assumptions
The Logical Fallacy of Audiatur Et Altera Pars / Failure to State Assumptions occurs when a logical argument is stated without divulging the assumptions (things believed to be true without evidence) on which the argument is based.
A deductive argument always requires a number of core assumptions or else Divine revelations. When assumptions are used, these assumptions are called premises, and are the assumptions the argument is built on. Premises are the reasons for accepting the conclusion. These premises may have been derived from previous reasoning that had its own premises. However, that reasoning also has premises. Unless something concrete is found, all premises are simply assumptions. They have zero truth value. Without Divine revelation, all human conclusions are based on assumptions. Eventually, truth must be based on something beyond an assumption. Assumptions are arbitrary unless they can be proven to be true, in which case, they are not really assumptions any more. They would be facts. The only way to prove anything to be true is through pure Divine revelation. (You can read more about this here.)
Examples of the Logical Fallacy of Audiatur Et Altera Pars / Failure to State Assumptions
All scientific theories are dependent on certain assumptions. When those theories are discussed, all of the assumptions and stories need to be disclosed and it must be admitted that the theory falls apart without them. If these assumptions and stories are not disclosed, then the discussion is irrational.
Discussions of morality or ethics must be based on either assumptions or Divine revelation. Either source needs to be disclosed or the discussion is irrational. One of the problems is that most assumptions are buried and hidden. Assumptions happen naturally in the human mind without conscious effort. Your own assumptions are generally not something you think about. In fact, you are likely to think of them as being part of reality, which they are not. For this reason, you probably never consciously think about them or admit them.
Author/Compiler
Last updated: Sep, 2014
Bread Crumbs
Home
>
Meaning
>
Christian Witness
>
Encyclopedia of Logical Fallacies
>
Fallacies of Omission
>
Audiatur Et Altera Pars
Main
Foundations
Home
Meaning
Bible
Dictionary
History
Toons & Vids
Quotations
Similar
Logical Fallacy of Stacking the Deck / Cherry Picking / Cherry Picking Data / Suppressed Evidence / Fallacy of Incomplete Evidence / Argument from Selective Observation / Argument by Half-Truth / Card Staking / Fallacy of Exclusion
Logical Fallacy of Ambiguity Effect
McNamara Fallacy
Head in the Sand / Ostrich Fallacy
Suppression of the Agent Fallacy
Fading Affect Bias / FAB
"What I Don't Know Is Not Important" / Unteachable Fallacy
Logical Fallacy of Argument by Selective Refutation
Logical Fallacy of A-Priorism
Logical Fallacy of Audiatur Et Altera Pars / Failure to State Assumptions
Error of Ignoring Historical Example
Logical Fallacy of Overlooking Secondary Consequences
Uncontrolled Factors Fallacy
Missing Link Fallacy
Logical Fallacy of Moving the Goal Posts / Gravity Game / Raising the Bar
Gravity Game Fallacy
Logical Fallacy of Argument by Demanding Impossible Perfection / Unfalsifiable Claims / Demanding Impossible Evidence
Unfalsifiable Claims Fallacy / Unfalsifiability / Untestibility
The Invincible Ignorance Fallacy
Logical Fallacy of Appeal to Ignorance / Ad Ignorantiam / Argument from Ignorance / Argument from a Lack of Evidence
Logical Fallacy of Ad Ignorantiam Question
God of the Gaps Fallacy
Logical Fallacy of Argument from Silence / Argumentum Ex Silentio
Logical Fallacy of No True Scotsman (a type of stacking the deck)
No True Scientist Fallacy
Fallacy of Opposition
Frozen Abstraction Fallacy
Falsified Inductive Generalization Fallacy
Logical Fallacy of Argument from the Negative
Logical Fallacy of a dicto simpliciter ad dictum secundum quid / Accident Fallacy
Converse Accident Fallacy / Reverse Accident Fallacy
Best-in-Field Fallacy
Abductive Fallacy / Retroduction Fallacy / Retroductive Fallacy
Logical Fallacy of Denialism / Denial
Logical Fallacy of Reductionism / Oversimplification
Persimplex Responsum Fallacy / Very Simple Answer Fallacy / Very Simple Solution Fallacy
Logical Fallacy of Reductionism / Oversimplification
Taboo Fallacy
Recent
Home
Answer to Critic
Appeal to Possibility
Circular Reasoning
Argument to the Future
Insignificant Cause
Word Magic
Love Between a Man and Woman
Author/Compiler
Colossians 2
Righteousness & Holiness
Don't Compromise
Sin
Proof by Atheism
Scriptures About Marriage
Genuine Authority
The Reason for Rejecting Truth
Witness on the Internet
Flaky Human Reasoning
How Do You Know?
Featured
The Real Purpose of the Church
The Real Purpose of Life
From Glory to Glory
REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT
REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT
How to be Led by God
How to Witness
Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality
Holiness & Mind/Soul
Redemption: Free From Sin
Real Reality
Stories Versus Revelation
Understanding Logic
Logical Fallacies
Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty?
How Can We Know Anything?
God's Word
God's Process
God's Pattern
Mind Designed to Relate to God
Answers for the Confused
Fossil Record Says: "Creation"
Avoid These Pitfalls
Public School's Religion
Twisting Science
Evolutionism
Public School Failures
Twisting History
How can we know anything about anything?
That's the real question
|