Logical Fallacy of Thought-Terminating Cliché / Cliché Thinking
Thought-terminating cliche is one of the many smokescreens that are used to cover the fact that the reasoning is based on one of the three fallacies of Agrippa's trilemma. Whenever a logical fallacy is committed, the fallacy has its roots in Agrippa's trilemma. All human thought (without Divine revelation) is based on one of three unhappy possibilities. These three possibilities are infinite regression, circular reasoning, or axiomatic thinking. This problem is known as Agrippa's trilemma. Some have claimed that only logic and math can be known without Divine revelation; however, that is not true. Without Divine revelation, neither logic nor math can be known. Science is also limited to the pragmatic because of the weakness on human reasoning, which is known as Agrippa's trilemma.
The Logical Fallacy of Thought-Terminating Cliché / Cliché Thinking occurs when a commonly used phrase or some folk wisdom is used as proof. This is often accompanied by a summary dismissal to cut off the discussion. It is often used as a form of summary dismissal. Cliché thinking is reductionist. This is, it over-simplifies things to such a degree that they are difficult to understand. The reasion that cliché thinking makes things hard to understand is that the cliché is thought to be a complete explanation.
For a statement or question to be a thought-terminating cliché, it must be in error. It must be misleading in some way. Trite sayings are not misleading. They are merely trite. When a saying is used to end discussion, and the saying is not a reason to end the discussion, and the saying creates a false impression, this is a logical fallacy of a thought-terminating cliché. For a statement or question to be a thought-terminating cliché, it must be in error. It must be misleading in some way. Trite sayings are not misleading. They are merely trite. When a saying is used to end discussion, and the saying is not a reason to end the discussion, and the saying creates a false impression, this is a logical fallacy of a thought-terminating cliché.
When people with naturalistic, materialistic, or agnostic presuppositions consider what is and is not a thought-terminating cliché, they run into Agrippa's Trilemma and cannot rationally decide what is and is not a thought-terminating cliché.
Thought-terminating clichés are those things that are said that do not come from the Holy Spirit. God speaks through those who hear His Voice and who respond to Him in submission. Learning to hear Him and respond in submission is a moment-by-moment, progressive process. Everything is not a discussion. In other words, much of life is handled with seemingly trite phrases.
- "Hello."
- "How are you?"
- "It's good to see you."
- "God bless you." (By the way, it is an insult to God to say this as a trite phrase. If you are going to say it, say it by the power of the Holy Spirit.)
To a dedicated and dogmatic Atheist, the following will seem to be thought-terminating clichés when they are not:
- "The Lord giveth, and the Lord taketh away." Job 1:21
- "Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve!" (opposing same-sex marriage)
- "That's not Biblical."
- "God moves/works in mysterious ways."
- "God never gives you more suffering than you can bear.”
- "Only God can judge."
- "God has a plan."
- "The Lord works in mysterious ways."
Although these were once listed on the infamous Wikipedia as examples of thought-terminating clichés, each one has deep spiritual meaning. They are never made to use lightly. Of course, any word that is not spoken by the leading and power of the Holy Spirit is sin and leads us away from God. When such phrases are used by habit or do not proceed from the leading of the Holy Spirit, they may be examples of thought-terminating clichés. Thought-terminating clichés, to be fallacies, must cut off further thought. Most of these Wikipedia examples would actually spur further thought and cause an open-minded person to seek the mind of God on the issue.
To an Atheist, "That's not Biblical." is a "so-what" saying. They have no idea that God speaks through Scripture. Well, they do know. God has revealed that they know on some level, but their senseless minds are darkened.
Examples of the Logical Fallacy of Thought-Terminating Cliché / Cliché Thinking
"Evolution is science."
The statement has the purpose of ending the discussion. It is false. Evolution is not science. Evolution is an intricate story. This thought-terminating cliché is designed to create a false impression and end discussion. It's purpose is end all questioning of the Big-Bang-Billions-of-Years-No-Flood-Molecules-to-Man story. No thinking allowed.
"God is dead."
This is supposed to be a clever statement that will end discussion and all thought. Those of us who personally know the Creator God are aware that this is a lie. However, it is designed to somehow influence some people into believing the lie.
Author/Compiler
Last updated: Sep, 2014
Bread Crumbs
Home
>
Meaning
>
Christian Witness
>
Encyclopedia of Logical Fallacies
>
Flawed Evidence
>
Thought-Terminating Cliche
Main
Foundations
Home
Meaning
Bible
Dictionary
History
Toons & Vids
Quotations
Similar
Logical Fallacy of Proof by Fallacy
Proof Surrogate / Evidence Surrogate
Error in Observation
Misrepresenting the Facts Fallacy
Logical Fallacy of Distorted Evidence
Logical Fallacy of Unverified Evidence
Logical Fallacy of Hysteron Proteron
The Logical Fallacy of Unsubstantiated Inference
Assuming Facts Not In Evidence
Logical Fallacy of Wishful Thinking
Logical Fallacy of Appeal to Worldview / Appeal to Fake-Reality / Appeal to Paradigm / Appeal to Confirmation Bias
Logical Fallacy of Slippery Slope
Logical Fallacy of Limited Scope
Logical Fallacy of Mind Reading
Logical Fallacy of Shoehorning
Logical Fallacy of Confirmation Bias
Sacred Cow Fallacy
Fantasy Projection / Worldview Projection / Fake-Reality Projection / Paradigm Projection / Context Projection
Group Think Fallacy
Logical Fallacy of Context Imposition
Psychologist's Fallacy
The Logical Fallacy ofAmazing Familiarity
Stolen Concept Fallacy / Smuggled Concept Fallacy
Logical Fallacy of Weak Inference
Logical Fallacy of Proof by Theoretical Stories
The Logical Fallacy of Anecdotal Evidence Presented as Scientific Evidence / Personal Testimony Presented as Scientific Evidence
Logical Fallacy of Dismissing All Personal Testimony
Logical Fallacy of Rewriting History / Have it Your Way
Logical Fallacy of Proof by Model
Logical Fallacy of Proof by Assumption
Logical Fallacy of Argument from Personal Incredulity / Personal Belief / Personal Conviction
Logical Fallacy of Argument by Lack of Imagination
Logical Fallacy of Argument by Imagination
The Logical Fallacy of Capturing the Naive / Argumentum ad Captandum / Argumentum ad Captandum Vulgus
Logical Fallacy of Argument from Personal Astonishment
Logical Fallacy of Special Pleading
Logical Fallacy of Variant Imagization
Logical Fallacy of Self-Exclusion
Logical Fallacy of Unintended Self-Inclusion
Ad Personam Fallacy
Logical Fallacy of Proof by Assertion / Proof by Repeated Assertion
Logical Fallacy of Cherishing the Zombie
Logical Fallacy of Argumentum Ad Lapidem
Logical Fallacy of Proof by Understatement / Misunderstanding by Understatement
Logical Fallacy of Proof by Logical Tautology
Logical Fallacy of Proof by False Declaration of Victory
Logical Fallacy of Assumption Correction Assumption
False Criteria Fallacy / Fallacy of Questionable Criteria
Logical Fallacy of Cutting Off Discussion / Summary Dismissal
Logical Fallacy of Thought-Terminating Cliche / ClicheThinking
Logical Fallacy of Truism
Logical Fallacy of the Perfect Solution / Nirvana Fallacy / Perfect Solution Fallacy / Perfectionist Fallacy
Just In Case Fallacy / Worst Case Scenario Fallacy
Logical Fallacy of Unwarranted Extrapolation
Logical Fallacy of Untestability
Logical Fallacy of Subjectivity / Relativist Fallacy / Subjectivist Fallacy
Logical Fallacy of Bizarre Hypothesis/Theory / Far-Fetched Hypothesis/Theory
Logical Fallacy of Least Plausible Hypothesis
Logical Fallacy of Extravagant Hypothesis / Complex Hypothesis Fallacy
Logical Fallacy of Privileging the Hypothesis
Logical Fallacy of Canceling Hypotheses
Logical Fallacy of Appeal to False Faith
Logical Fallacy of False Appeal to Heaven / Appeal to Heaven / Gott Mit Uns / Manfest Destiny / Special Covenant
Logical Fallacy of Inaccurate Models
Logical Fallacy of Hedging / Having Your Cake / Failure to Assert / Diminished Claim / Failure to Choose Sides / Talking out of Both Sides of Your Mouth / If by Whiskey
Preacher's "We" / Salesman's "We" / Politician's "We" Fallacy
Logical Fallacy of Appeal to Nature
Logical Fallacy of Experimenter Bias
Fallacy of the Crucial Experiment
Logical Fallacy of Argument from Hearsay / Telephone Game / Chinese Whispers / Anecdotal Evidence / Volvo Fallacy
Logical Fallacy of Ad Hoc Rescue / Ad Hoc Hypothesis
The Logical Fallacy of Hindsight Bias / Knew-it-all-Along Effect / Creeping Determinism
Logical Fallacy of Continuum / Argument of the Beard / Fallacy of the Beard / Heap Fallacy / Heap Paradox Fallacy / Bald Man Fallacy / Continuum Fallacy / Line Drawing Fallacy / Sorites Fallacy
Logical Fallacy of Argument from Fallacy / Argumentum Ad Logicam
Logical Fallacy of Inflation of Conflict
Logical Fallacy of Infinite Regress / Homunculus Argument
The Logical Fallacy of Reification / Anti-Conceptual Mentality Fallacy / Attributing Concreteness to the Abstract / Concretism / Hypostatization Fallacy / Objectification
Logical Fallacy of Reification / Personification
Logical Fallacy Slothful Induction
Logical Fallacy of Superstitious Thinking / Magical Thinking
Logical Fallacy of Meaningless Question
Logical Fallacy of Proving Non-Existence
Argumentum ad Imaginibus
Statement of Conversion Fallacy
Logical Fallacy of Outdated Information
Logical Fallacy of Argument by Laziness
Alien Fallacy
Quantum Physics Fallacy
Fallacious Abstraction Fallacy
Appeal to the Untested / Appeal to the Unknown Fallacy
Grasping at Straws
Appeal to Pragmatism Fallacy / Pragmatic Fallacy / Appeal to Convenience / Pragmatism / Appeal to Utility / Argumentum Ad Convenientiam
Appeal to Fake Hope
Appeal to Intuition Fallacy
Appeal to Mystery Fallacy
Argument from Design Fallacy
Untestability Fallacy
Fallacy of Imaginary Evidence
Monopolizing the Question / Hypophora
Fallacy of Antecedent / Fallacy of Time
Faulty Sign / Faulty Predictor Fallacy
Pretentious Antecedent
Logical Fallacy of Pretentious Premise
Recent
Home
Answer to Critic
Appeal to Possibility
Circular Reasoning
Argument to the Future
Insignificant Cause
Word Magic
Love Between a Man and Woman
Author/Compiler
Colossians 2
Righteousness & Holiness
Don't Compromise
Sin
Proof by Atheism
Scriptures About Marriage
Genuine Authority
The Reason for Rejecting Truth
Witness on the Internet
Flaky Human Reasoning
How Do You Know?
Featured
The Real Purpose of the Church
The Real Purpose of Life
From Glory to Glory
REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT
REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT
How to be Led by God
How to Witness
Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality
Holiness & Mind/Soul
Redemption: Free From Sin
Real Reality
Stories Versus Revelation
Understanding Logic
Logical Fallacies
Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty?
How Can We Know Anything?
God's Word
God's Process
God's Pattern
Mind Designed to Relate to God
Answers for the Confused
Fossil Record Says: "Creation"
Avoid These Pitfalls
Public School's Religion
Twisting Science
Evolutionism
Public School Failures
Twisting History
How can we know anything about anything?
That's the real question
|