click here to learn more about being redeemed from sin and set free to serve God in spirit and in truth. click here to learn more about holiness click here to learn more about being changed into the same image click here to learn more about sowing and reaping click here to learn more about the free gift of righteousness. click here to learn more about how faith gives us access to grace and grace does the works. click here to learn more about faith and how it comes. click here to learn more about acknowledging Jesus click here to learn more about how God speaks Who will you listen to?  Click here to learn more. click here to learn more about the pattern of God. click here to learn more about the pattern of God for individuals, marriage, and family. click here to learn more about the pattern of God for the local church click here to learn more about the Church universal
SeekFind Logo Menu

Breeding experiments have done much to debunk the evolutionary dogma.


If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.

Breeding Experiments Debunk Evolution

The Many breeding experiments (at huge cost to taxpayers) were conducted to unsuccessfully attempt to prove that micro evolution (a deceptive word that actually means mutations or adaptations and has nothing to do with the molecules-to-man evolution conjecture / fabrication) will lead to macro evolution (that is, molecules to man--the General Theory of Evolution) over time. They have confirmed just the opposite of what they were trying to prove. No matter how they try, they find that no information is added to genetic material (which is the real claim of evolutionism) by random events. Information comes from intelligence--in the case of the creation, unimaginable intelligence. (Read the latest science on the subject: Without Excuse by Werner Gitt, a description of the scientific Laws of Universal Information. See also: Information Theory Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4. Here is another interesting article.) More is constantly being learned about information and about the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Evolutionists tend to hide in the weeds of the unknown with an argument from ignorance: "If you can't prove, by empirical science, that evolution is impossible, then it happened." By empirical science alone, we can only prove probabilities. The probabilities show the Big-Bang-Billions-of-Years-No-Flood-Molecules-to-Man story to be a bazaar hypothesis, a story that is so improbable that it should not be considered. However, empirical science is not a tool that can prove anything to be true or false absolutely. For absolute proof, we have revelation. (See Basic and Concise Guide to Practical, Useful Logic and Reasoning). God says that He created everything. He is the One Who enforces the laws of nature. He is the One Who will judge all of us in the end. We know that because we know Him presonally through the indwelling Presence of Jesus Christ and the moment-by-moment instruction of the Holy Spirit.

Evolution isn't science.

Chance mutations move organizms toward less information in the genome if anything. Random events can't add organization and information to that which is stored in the DNA molecule.They do not increase the information or create inprovements that would develop into a more complex creature, yet Evolutionists claim that chance mutations are the mechanism for adding information to the genome. Random events of any kind don't add to information in the gene pool either. Random events always remove information.

Genetic information that is already in the cell will produce what has been termed micro evolution, but never a new kind of living thing. There are very clear limits to the changes produced by the genetic variability that is built into the cells, and it should be clear that the ability to vary and adapt was put into the cell by the Creator.

Survival of the fittest will only filter out mutations. It will not add information. Survival of the fittest will only select from the information already in the gene pool. It has no power to add information to the gene pool.

This is one example of the enormity of the improbable, unworkable hypothesis. Evolution is a prime example of a politically correct hypothesis, which must be defended even though it is preposterous"Read John Sanford's book Genetic Entropy and the Mystery of the Genome and wonder how intelligent people could ever bring themselves to believe that mutations would create progress in fitness, and continue to believe natural selection built all the wonders of life, decades after it was demonstrated by evolution-believing secular population geneticists to be unworkable."(Source: CREV - read more)

Evolution isn't science.

Depending on which definition you use, Natural Selection can be real. It works to eliminate severe mutations. Natural Selection can mean different things depending on the context in which it is used, though. Some of those contexts actually try to transform Natural Selection into molecules-to-man Evolution. They also try to confuse people into believing that small adaptations (calling this micro-evolution, which is a deceiving term.) add up to molecules-to-man Evolution. At other times, Natural Selection is written about as if it were an intelligent all-powerful god that thinks things through and does them. But Natural Selection as a description of the way that severe mutations result in the death of the mutated life form is real. It can't add information and it appears that mutation never adds any information either. At least, no one has ever been able to observe information being added despite many tax dollars trying to do so. Most mutations aren't detrimental enough, however, for Natural Selection to operate. Small mutations can build up in a population over time and cause extinction. It is illegitimate to use Natural Selection to support Evolution. Natural Selection supports a young Earth and a Creator.

Information can be added to the DNA through natural processes. (see video above)


  1. Astronomy and Astrophysics (evidence for design, big bang problems, dark matter, seeing distant starlight)
  2. Solar System and Extra-solar planets Q&A (evidence for design, age, the Sun, planets, moons, comets, extra-solar planets)
  3. Aliens/UFOs (are extra-terrestrial aliens visiting us?)
  4. Galileo, geocentrism, and Joshua's long day

Bible, God, theology

  1. Bible (is it the Word of God? How are we to understand it?)
  2. Genesis (real history or mythology/polemic?)
  3. God (does God exist? what is He like?)
  4. Jesus Christ (the 'Son of God'? Why did He die? Resurrection?)
  5. Atheism, agnosticism and humanism: godless religions

Biology (creation vs evolution)

  1. Origin of life (origin of life theories critiqued, including life-from-space)
  2. Design features (dozens! ID, biomimetics, 'bad' design, astronomy, irreducible complexity)
  3. Natural selection (yes, it happens but it is not the same as evolution)
  4. Mutations (yes, they happen, but they can't change microbes into microbiologists)
  5. Speciation (yes, it happens, but it is limited to variation within the created kind)
  6. Genetics ('mitochondrial Eve', ape vs human DNA, gene duplication, genetic engineering, cloning, longevity of patriarchs)
  7. Information theory (including DNA) (information defined, claimed new information) Evolution has a troubling information problem.
  8. Probabilities (could life arise by chance? What about computer simulations of evolution?)
  9. Thermodynamics and order (how the laws of thermodynamics contradict Naturalism)
  10. Vestigial organs (including 'junk' DNA)
  11. Embryonic recapitulation and similarities (Haeckel's fraudulent concept, plus similarities due to common design)
  12. Charles Darwin (his religious views, contribution to human suffering, natural selection vs evolution)

Creation: relevance to Christianity, society and science

  1. Creation: Why It matters
  2. Death and suffering (Why? Origin of bad things such as poisons, carnivory, Satan)
  3. Creation compromises (theistic evolution, gap theory, progressive creation, framework, etc.)
  4. Apologetics defending the faith (proof & presuppositions, New Age, postmodernism, hell)
  5. Philosophy (logic and faith, proof of God, evolution and materialism)
  6. Countering the Critics (anti-creationists, 'bad' design, probability, 'proof' for an old earth)
  7. Bible 'contradictions' and 'errors' (answering attacks on the Bible)
  8. Communism and Nazism (the evolution connection)
  9. Science (what is it? Is creation or evolution science?)
  10. Arguments creationists should NOT use
  11. Creation Scientists (and other biographies)

Geology, the Flood, the Ice Age and the age of the earth

  1. Young Age Evidence (astronomy, botany, geology, fossils, caves, coal, glaciology, human history, oceanography)
  2. Radiometric Dating (radiometric dating problems, flaws, rapid decay? radiohalos)
  3. Flood (global? fish survival? Black Sea flood? flood legends).
  4. Noah s Ark (size, construction, stability, feasibility, care for animals, diseases, biogeography)
  5. Geology (Flood evidences, coal formation, limestone caves, rapid rocks, age of fossils?)
  6. Plate Tectonics (continental drift and catastrophic plate tectonics)
  7. Ice Age (post-Flood Ice Age, ice core dating, multiple Ice Ages? mammoths)


  1. Archaeology (archaeology and the Bible, from the Flood to New Testament times)
  2. History (including biblical chronology, genealogies, origin of deep time beliefs)
  3. Scopes Trial (What is the truth?)
  4. Linguistics (languages point to the Tower of Babel, animals talking?)


  1. Fossils (rapid formation, missing links, living fossils, dino-birds?, whale origins, tetrapods)
  2. Anthropology (human ancestry, alleged ape-men)
  3. Dinosaurs (humans coexist with? evidence against millions of years, birds from dinosaurs?
  4. Mammoths (how they fit with the post-Flood Ice Age)


Last updated: Jun, 2013
How God Will Transform You - FREE Book  

Bread Crumbs

Home     >   Meaning     >   Christian Witness     >   Answers for Witness     >   Stories Versus Revelation     >   Creation, Flood, Etc.     >   Creation v. Evolution     >   The Problems with Evolution     >   Breeding Experiments








Toons & Vids



There Are Several Very Clear Reasons that Evolution Presents False Dogma and These Reasons Cannot Be Refuted.

How Do We Know That Evolutionary Progress Has Never Been Observed?

Evolution Is A Series Of Broken Arguments

There Is No Evidence Of So-Called Evolutionary Links Between Kinds Of Living Things

What Is The Basis Or Mechanism That Would Allow Evolutionism's Claims To Work?

Breeding experiments have done much to debunk the evolutionary dogma.

Complexity, Information, And The 2nd Law Of Thermodynamics Show Evolution To Be Impossible

Nothing Creates Itself -- Ever!

Evolutionists Make The Sanity-defying Claim That The First Strand Of DNA Arose By Natural Selection.

Has anyone ever seen proof of evolution?

Who Could Even Believe Such a Thing?! No One, Really. Some People Brainwash Themselves.

There Are No Examples Of Continued Overall Increases In Complexity And Information Without Intelligence.

What is the new type of scientific method that has been developed especially for evolution?

Questions and Answers: What is the basis for your statement that no new genetic information is produced or created?

Questions and Answers: What About the Kangaroo in Australia Only? Does That Prove Evolution?



Answer to Critic

Appeal to Possibility

Circular Reasoning

Argument to the Future

Insignificant Cause

Word Magic

Love Between a Man and Woman


Colossians 2

Righteousness & Holiness

Don't Compromise


Proof by Atheism

Scriptures About Marriage

Genuine Authority

The Reason for Rejecting Truth

Witness on the Internet

Flaky Human Reasoning

How Do You Know?


The Real Purpose of the Church

The Real Purpose of Life

From Glory to Glory

REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT

REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT

How to be Led by God

How to Witness

Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality

Holiness & Mind/Soul

Redemption: Free From Sin

Real Reality

Stories Versus Revelation

Understanding Logic

Logical Fallacies

Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty?

How Can We Know Anything?

God's Word

God's Process

God's Pattern

Mind Designed to Relate to God

Answers for the Confused

Fossil Record Says: "Creation"

Avoid These Pitfalls

Public School's Religion

Twisting Science


Public School Failures

Twisting History

How can we know anything about anything? That's the real question

more info: mouseover or click

The complexity of Gods Way understood in a single diagram
Obey your flesh and descend into darkness