Middle Puzzle Part Fallacy

The middle puzzle part fallacy is one of the many smokescreens that are used to cover the fact that the reasoning is based on one of the three fallacies of Agrippa's trilemma. Whenever a logical fallacy is committed, the fallacy has its roots in Agrippa's trilemma. All human thought (without Divine revelation) is based on one of three unhappy possibilities. These three possibilities are infinite regress, circular reasoning, or axiomatic thinking. This problem is known as Agrippa's trilemma. Some have claimed that only logic and math can be known without Divine revelation; however, that is not true. There is no reason to trust either logic or math without Divine revelation. Science is also limited to the pragmatic because of the weakness on human reasoning, which is known as Agrippa's trilemma. This is a fallacy that superimposes another level of fallacy on top or one or more of the three fallacies of Agrippa's trilemma.

The Middle Puzzle Part Fallacy occurs when a spurious connection is made between different things by changing the meaning of words.

Examples of the Middle Puzzle Part Fallacy

"Science shows evolution to be true. We can observe evolution [meaning observed changes from one generation of living things to another] every day. So, anyone who denies evolution [meaning unobserved molecules to man] is denying science."

Here, a spurious connection is being made between science and evolution. This has been done successfully for over 100 years. In fact, judges have been led down the primrose path with this fallacy, making irrational rulings.