Logical Fallacy of Limited Scope
Whenever a logical fallacy is committed, the fallacy has its roots in Agrippa's trilemma. All human thought (without Divine revelation) is based on one of three unhappy possibilities. These three possibilities are infinite regression, circular reasoning, or axiomatic thinking. This problem is known as Agrippa's trilemma. Some have claimed that only logic and math can be known without Divine revelation; however, that is not true. Without Divine revelation, neither logic nor math can be known. Science is also limited to the pragmatic because of the weakness on human reasoning, which is known as Agrippa's trilemma. Limited scope is one of the many smokescreens that are used to cover the fact that the reasoning is based on one of the three fallacies of Agrippa's trilemma.
The logical fallacy of limited scope occurs when a theory can’t logically explain all of what is observed. Of course, any story can be made up, even if that story is a fallacy such as, “One day, science will surely find an answer to this problem.”
Examples of the Logical Fallacy of Limited Scope
Evolution doesn’t explain The Second Law of Thermodynamics, The Law of Universal Information, or the Law of Biogenesis.
Evolutionists have stories to cover these, but the stories don’t work.
Flood-denial theories don’t explain the Grand Canyon.
How can we know anything about anything? That’s the real question
|
