If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.

Dogmatic Presuppositions

Evolution isn't science. To try to understand anything in life without having spiritual eyes to see and spiritual ears to hear would be impossible. Pseudo-scientists, who claim that there is nothing spiritual and have no experience with Jesus Christ, are in a bad position, but, partial truth should always be recognized as just that. We know in part, but when that which is complete comes, then, that will be a different story.

Why would anyone become dogmatic about their presuppositions? If they can't prove those presuppositions to be true, why be so dogmatic?

Evolution presupposes Atheism, Materialism (which is another word for Atheism), Naturalism (which is another way of saying that there is no spiritual realm and that God, angels, and demons have no effect on anything), and Uniformitarianism (which is to claim that there was not flood and there was no creation). Evolutionists then proceed to try to prove that there was no creations. They must also try to prove that there was no flood, since the catastrophic world-side flood described in the Bible and many other ancient texts requires a completely different interpretation of the fossils. So, they are presupposing what they hope to prove. That is the blatant circular reasoning.

How could anyone live their lives according to assumptions and then forget that the assumptions are arbitrary and think they are facts, treating them as presuppositions.  These presuppositions are just simple-minded assumptions.  They are filters and a way to censor out any information that supports the existence of God.  They set up a web of rules to filter out God.  They will only accept those things that conform to Naturalism, materialism, and uniformitarianism.  Naturalism claims that God does nothing.  Materialism claims that there is no God or spiritual realm.  Uniformitarianism claims that there was not creation and that there was no violent worldwide flood, as the Bible and numerous other historical accounts record.  Whatever they observe that does not conform to this complex filter is censored.  The way that it is censored can take several forms.  The ungodly may boldly proclaim that, though the data appears to support God's version and refute the version of the ungodly, yet it still must be interpreted to mean just the opposite of what it does mean.  A backup method that ungodly people use is to prophecy that in the future, science will be able to explain what they see as an anomaly.  If that fails, they will hide the data, set it aside, or lie to keep the public from knowing the truth.  The data clearly demolishes the story of the ungodly and clearly supports the reality of the Creator God, His Bible, and His abiding Presence in His people.  When confronted with the obvious, a closed-minded ungodly person says, "I can't understand it."  They are willingly ignorant because they refuse to hold God in their knowledge.  The reality is that these people, for whatever reason, don't what to know the Creator.  They don't want to truly know Jesus, their Creator.