If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.

Tactics

Why would a supposed scientific theory, Evolutionism, block any questioning of its validity?

Why would a scientific theory not follow the evidence when the evidence points away from the theory?

If Evolutionism were valid, Evolutionists would not seek to control the message so closely. They would let the facts speak for themselves.

If Evolutionism were valid, Evolutionists would openly explore possibilities other than those dictated by Naturalism, materialism, and uniformitarianism.

If Evolutionism were valid, Evolutionists would be able to provide evidence that proves that it actually happened rather than just telling stories/tales that don't sync with the scientific facts all that well.  And they wouldn't need to attack the Bible since they would have actual evidence that molecules-to-man evolution actually happened.

If Evolutionism were valid, Evolutionists would be able to demonstrate, using real science, that Naturalism, Materialism, and Uniforitarianism are actually reality rather than just presupposing these unprovable dogmas.

If Evolutionism were valid, Evolutionists would not become so emotional when anyone points out the shortcomings of their theory.

If Evolutionism were valid, Evolutionists would not use coercion when anyone points out the shortcomings of their theory.

If Evolutionism were valid, Evolutionists would give straightforward reasoning and data to show that this was the case.

If Evolutionism were valid, Evolutionists would show us millions of transitional forms showing the millions of transitions that would be necessary for evolution to have taken place. **

If Evolutionism were valid, Evolutionists would not make excuses for the lacking evidence. Real evidence would be available.

If Evolutionism were valid, Evolutionists would not claim that the lack of evidence is evidence for Evolution.

If Evolutionism were valid, Evolutionists would not use the debunked, bogus, and fraudulent "evidences" that amount to flim-flam.

These are all tactics that were used by some in the Church during the dark ages after the Church lost the glory of God. These are tactics that have been used by all the other false religions, Islam, Communism, Atheism, the UFO cult, and many other false religions use such tactics.

Astronomy

• Astronomy and Astrophysics (evidence for design, big bang problems, dark matter, seeing distant starlight)
• Solar System and Extra-solar planets Q&A (evidence for design, age, the Sun, planets, moons, comets, extra-solar planets)
• Aliens/UFOs (are extra-terrestrial aliens visiting us?)
• Galileo, geocentrism, and Joshua's long day

Bible, God, theology

• Bible (is it the Word of God? How are we to understand it?)
• Genesis (real history or mythology/polemic?)
• God (does God exist? what is He like?)
• Jesus Christ (the 'Son of God'? Why did He die? Resurrection?)
• Atheism, agnosticism and humanism: godless religions

Biology (creation vs evolution)

• Origin of life (origin of life theories critiqued, including life-from-space)
• Design features (dozens! ID, biomimetics, 'bad' design, astronomy, irreducible complexity)
• Natural selection (yes, it happens but it is not the same as evolution)
• Mutations (yes, they happen, but they can't change microbes into microbiologists)
• Speciation (yes, it happens, but it is limited to variation within the created kind)
• Genetics ('mitochondrial Eve', ape vs human DNA, gene duplication, genetic engineering, cloning, longevity of patriarchs)
• Information theory (including DNA) (information defined, claimed new information) Evolution has a very real information problem.
• Probabilities (could life arise by chance? What about computer simulations of evolution?)
• Thermodynamics and order (how the laws of thermodynamics contradict Naturalism)
• Vestigial organs (including 'junk' DNA)
• Embryonic recapitulation and similarities (Haeckel's fraudulent concept, plus similarities due to common design)
• Charles Darwin (his religious views, contribution to human suffering, natural selection vs evolution)

Creation: relevance to Christianity, society and science

• Creation: Why It matters
• Death and suffering (Why? Origin of bad things such as poisons, carnivory, Satan)
• Creation compromises (theistic evolution, gap theory, progressive creation, framework, etc.)
• Apologetics defending the faith (proof & presuppositions, New Age, postmodernism, hell)
• Philosophy (logic and faith, proof of God, evolution and materialism)
• Countering the Critics (anti-creationists, 'bad' design, probability, 'proof' for an old earth)
• Bible 'contradictions' and 'errors' (answering attacks on the Bible)
• Communism and Nazism (the evolution connection)
• Science (what is it? Is creation or evolution science?)
• Arguments creationists should NOT use
• Creation Scientists (and other biographies)

Geology, the Flood, the Ice Age and the age of the earth

• Young Age Evidence (astronomy, botany, geology, fossils, caves, coal, glaciology, human history, oceanography)
• Radiometric Dating (radiometric dating problems, flaws, rapid decay? radiohalos)
• Flood (global? fish survival? Black Sea flood? flood legends).
• Noah s Ark (size, construction, stability, feasibility, care for animals, diseases, biogeography)
• Geology (Flood evidences, coal formation, limestone caves, rapid rocks, age of fossils?)
• Plate Tectonics (continental drift and catastrophic plate tectonics)
• Ice Age (post-Flood Ice Age, ice core dating, multiple Ice Ages? mammoths)

History

• Archaeology (archaeology and the Bible, from the Flood to New Testament times)
• History (including biblical chronology, genealogies, origin of deep time beliefs)
• Scopes Trial (What is the truth?)
• Linguistics (languages point to the Tower of Babel, animals talking?)

Paleontology

• Fossils (rapid formation, missing links, living fossils, dino-birds?, whale origins, tetrapods)
• Anthropology (human ancestry, alleged ape-men)
• Dinosaurs (humans coexist with? evidence against millions of years, birds from dinosaurs?
• Mammoths (how they fit with the post-Flood Ice Age)

"What makes the question complex is that in place of the countless thousands of transitional forms expected--as Darwin indicated, and rightly so, should be found, and anticipated would be found in future--there exists at any point in time a handful of candidates, i.e. fossils put forward as transitional forms by evolutionary proponents. [Note: By 'transitional forms' is meant here fossils showing intermediate stages between major evolutionary transitions, i.e. from one kind of creature to a wholly different kind. For example, stages in the supposed transition of a walking reptile to a flying bird, nothing which creationists could regard as variation/speciation within a kind. Some evolutionists argue that we have countless thousands of transitional fossils, but they empty the term 'transitional fossil' of any content really meaningful for the creation-evolution debate. They define a fossil as 'transitional' in the same sense that a car is 'transitional' between a unicycle and a truck. That is not in view here.] Creationists by definition would argue that there are none, so to evolutionists this is seen as 'proof'. From a creation perspective, though, consider the following:" Go to http://creation.com/missing-links-parade for the rest of this article.