History

Origins And Stories About Origins       How Have The Secular Humanists Distorted The History Of The Crusades?       How Have Secular Humanists Distorted The History Of Galileo?       The Temple Under King Solomon And The Value Of Pi Correctly Calculated For The Cast Metal Sea       America's Christians Roots       Fact Sheet: History Of The United States Filibuster       How Have The Schools Teamed Up With Hollywood To Spread A Myth About The Scopes Monkey Trial?       The History Of The Corruption Of Law In The United States Of America       The Reason For The Move Toward Injustice Is That America Has Turned From Truth To Relativism.       The Founding Fathers Understood Law To Be Derived From God       The Washington Monument: LAUS DEO!       Are All 50 States Wrong?       United Nations Fact Sheet       1966 USA, Kwanzaa Invented By American Gang Member/FBI Informant       Creating Utopia?       How Has The Separation Of Church And State Become Another Myth Of Cult Liberalism?       The Government Wants To Be In The Church?       What Is The Truth About Stem Cell Research?       Media Bias In All Areas       Why Has The New Age Religion And Liberalism Become The Established Religion Of America?       The Myths Of Iraq       Has America Lived Out It's Time In History?

Big Brother, in the book, 1984, realized that the key to controlling the future was to control history.  He employed and army of editors to edit all historical documents to eliminate any troublesome facts.  Today, there is an army of editors doing similar work.  We often call them "scholars."  As of this writing, this army is using the philosophy called "Post Modernism" to justify their re-writing of history.  Their work has extended to long before there was a philosophy called "Post Modernism," however.  They call their work, reconstructing history, and they hate those whom they call constructionists.  Constructionists are those who work from evidence.  Reconstructionists, in the final analysis, consider the evidence to useful only when it supports their claims.  They have no problem at all taking words out of context or even making things up.  When any evidence does not support the assumptions of liberalism, the reconstructionists will use every trick at their disposal to try to make it appear as if the evidence is discredited.  If that doesn't work, which is most of the time, they simply ignore the evidence.