|
|
Truth
Bible
There's More!
Answers
Cults
Christian Confusion
Ungodly Counsel
History
Quotations
Cartoons
About
Links
Link To This Page
AddSiteURL
Contact Us
|
|||||||
Cults |
Confusing Words | Old Earth? | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
Here Is A Quick Explanation Of Why Evolution Is Religious Dogma Of Many Cults And It Is Not Science
Here is a quick explanation of why evolution is religious dogma of many cults and it is not science. If you want to know more about any subject, click the links. EVOLUTION IS A SERIES OF BROKEN ARGUMENTS A common tactic of evolutionists is to stack one bogus argument on top of another and continue this process hoping to bury you in the debris. On examining each argument, you find that not one of them has any value. Since they have no real arguments left, many Evolutionists are even turning to New Age religions. Evolution is not based on science but on a philosophy called naturalism. The idea that a large body of scientific knowledge support evolution is a carefully created illusion. If evolution were a real theory and not a religion, it would have been abandoned long ago. Evolution is a failed hypothesis that is jealously defended by well presented untruths and extreme message control. Creationism is a label for that which is obvious.
Creation is obvious. Nothing creates itself. Seeing is believing--Example NO ONE HAS EVER SEEN EVIDENCE OF EVOLUTION The transmutation of reptiles into birds and mammals, or of apes into men, or any other "upward" changes is void of scientific proof. Surely something like this would leave some evidence . . . but there is none. None! No one has ever seen evolution happen. Scientists agree that, if evolution actually did happen, then there should be many indisputable "transitional forms" that we could observe among the fossils. If evolution had actually taken place, millions of "transitional" forms would be there, but they are not. There are no truly verified "transitional forms"--none. There are only a handful of very disputable so-called "transitional forms". "In all the billions of fossils known to exist, not one example of a real evolutionary transformational series has ever been found." http://icr.org/index.php?module=articles&action=view&ID=2477 At any given time there are always a couple of instances of evolutionists having claimed to have found some transitional form, but these are always shown to be either frauds or errors within a number of years. Evolutionary Growth Has Never Been Observed? THE FOSSIL RECORD POINTS TO CREATION The fossil record is one of the best arguments against evolution. In the modern world we see dogs and cats and bears and other kinds. In the fossil record, we also see dogs and cats and bears and other kinds, but not any in between forms. Evolution is not happening now and there are no indications that it ever has happened. MICRO-EVOLUTION IS AN EXAMPLE OF FLIM FLAM Evolutionists refer to two unrelated processes as if they had something to do with each other, which they do not. 1. One of the processes is the process of variation that occurs by using the information in the DNA molecule. When living cells use existing, inherited information, this is not evolution, nor could it possibly lead to anything new since it is inherited information from the parent that is allowing the variation. The only reason anyone would want to apply the word, evolution, to this process would be to cause confusion, confusion which is used to deceive. 2. The second, and unrelated, process is that of mutating. Time and chance CANNOT add information or organization to a DNA molecule. Random events never produce organization and information, just as rocks never roll up hills unless some outside force rolls them up the hill. It should be obvious to anyone that natural selection has no mechanism to add information to anything. It only selects from what is already available. THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS PROVES CREATION Time and chance result in less information and less organization. That is the proven 2nd law of thermodynamics. Adding energy from an external source, as the Japanese did to Pearl Harbor and the U.S. did to Hiroshima a few decades ago, just makes things worse. Only if there is a mechanism to control, direct, and use that energy according to a plan will there be any benefit from outside energy. When evolutionists claim that adding energy reverses the Second Law of Thermodynamics, they are either showing ignorance or showing a willingness to lie. see also, Thermodynamics: David Berlinski, The Deniable Darwin THE COMPLEXITY OF CREATION PROVES THAT IT WAS CREATED Even the most simple cell is complex beyond our ability to understand. It is insane for evolutionists say that it popped into existence by chance. Nothing complex comes into existence by time and chance. GEOLOGY SHOWS EVIDENCE OF THE FLOOD There is evidence of a restructuring of the planet on a scale and in a way that would be consistent with a world-wide flood. The types of restructuring that is evident is difficult to interpret in any other way other than that there was a world-wide, catastrophic flood followed by a shifting of the earth’s surface in which the ocean areas went down and the continents and mountains went up. The big bang theory is not even a hypothesis let alone a theory. The universe is, in fact, an open system, and God, Who is outside of the system, created it. No other explanation works.EVOLUTION IS NOT EVEN A THEORY A theory, to an evolutionist, is defined as something that has been proved. There is not a shred of proof for the fairy tale we call “evolution.” The scientific observations regarding DNA have not helped the case of the evolutionists except to create a new area where they can get away with telling half truths because the public is not aware of the details of DNA research. Sometimes, evolutionists even claim that DNA evidence supports evolution, but it does not. The complexity of DNA is proof of creation. Evolution is a doctrine of several New Age religions. There is no real science in evolution. Creationists and evolutionists are looking at the same facts but coming up with different conclusions. We need to decide what is a valid thought. This is really the basis of the difference between the two arguments. What authority will govern how we interpret facts. Evolutionists try to say that they are neutral, but they are not. Evolutionists assume no God, no flood, no miracles, no spirits, no creation, rejecting all observation that conflicts with these assumptions. Creationists have no such presuppositions and take their observations as ample evidence of God, the worldwide flood, miracles, spirits, and creation. Evolutionism stays politically alive by using false claims, claims that are later proven false. By the time one false evolutionistic claim is proven to be false, the evolutionists have developed a new false claim to take its place. THE BIBLE IS STILL UNCHALLENGED All attempts have failed to find an error or inconsistency in the Bible. All attempts have failed to explain away the miracles in the Bible using the assumptions of naturalism, materialism and uniformitarianism. Fraud is being committed repeatedly by the evolutionists. Evolutionists even continue to use many of the frauds of the past, knowing that they are obvious frauds that have already been debunked. They continue to present as fact information that is very questionable. Some of the evolutionists have admitted that these frauds and lies are intentional and they try to rationalize various defenses of the deceptive methods and practices. Of course, once the Bible is taken out of the picture, by what standard would it be wrong to lie? That's enough right there to prove that evolution is a foolish fairy tale, but, if you care to really find out all the facts, this is only the tip of the iceberg. Evolution is a scientific impossibility. And they don't tell this to the kids in public schools. What a shame! Author/Compiler: Bob Stenson (unless otherwise noted) Last updated: 2008-11-21 12:48:11 |
Previous - Next
Want more?
Featured Articles: The Real Purpose of the Church. |
|
|