|Who is lying; is it the Ungodly Evolutionists or the Bible-Believing Christians?|
Who Is More Likely To Lie?
Who is more likely to lie? Is it those who follow the philosophy of the ungodly, which says, "Do as thou wilt." "There are no absolutes." "There are no lies and there is no truth, only winners and losers." Or, on the other hand, is it those who follow Jesus Christ, wjp sau, "Follow the ten commandments." "There are absolutes." "There are lies and there is truth." "It is not so much about winning as it is about doing the right thing." Granted, there will be mistakes and lies on both sides. There will be things that can be spun by the ungodly media as being a lie when, in fact, no lie was told. And haven't we seen it over and over from ungodly politicians, ungodly "entertainers," ungodly "news" casters, ungodly "scientists," ungodly authors, ungodly teachers, and ungodly film-makers? And that is part of the execution of the doctrine of ungodliness. Bottom line! The ungodly tend to respect a good ungodly liar and to accuse anyone brave enough to tell the truth of lying.
I would think that it would be very clear to everyone who wants to know who is lying. It seems so clear to me, but some people seem confused.
Someone's lying, but who? Is it the ungodly, who don't believe in truth or the godly who believe in truth? Hmmmm. I wonder...
The argument is simply this, did everything create itself through natural processes or did God create everything like the Bible says. There is so much conflicting information in this argument that someone has to be lying. It seems to be difficult, at first, to tell who is lying. The reality is that it is easy to tell who is telling the truth and who is lying. Evolution, by the way, isn't science.
Let's look at the world-view of the believers of Evolution. As an aside, Evolution is just one of the precepts of the ungodly's great smorgasbord of religious ideas. Let's compare this Evolutionistic world-view to that of a godly.
The Evolutionists will tell you a half truth about the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The Evolutionists will tell the half truth: "The Second Law of Thermodynamics only applies to isolated systems, so it's not relevant to evolution, because the Earth is an open system." This is a clever lie. Here is the part of the truth that they are withholding: the Second Law of Thermodynamics was derived using theoretical isolated systems, but it applies to all systems, and can only be overcome locally and temporarily in open systems when stringent conditions are met. Not only that, but we are not talking about the Earth. The Earth is just a subsystem of a much larger system called the Universe. The Universe is an isolated system. Evolutionists claim that Evolution took place in this isolated system, but the Second Law of Thermodynamics tells us that their story is a myth.
Related to this is the information problem. The supposed Theory of Evolution has no mechanism for evolving. The story now goes that a mutation duplicates a section of DNA. Then, mutation creates new information in that duplicated DNA. Then, natural selection kicks in and selects for the new change. The problem is that no creation of information has ever been observed by any natural process. Information comes from existing information. It never creates itself. Without new information being created, evolution is impossible. Evolution has a troubling information problem.
(Read the latest science on the subject: Without Excuse by Werner Gitt, a description of the scientific Laws of Universal Information. See also: Information Theory Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4. Here is another interesting article.) More is constantly being learned about information and about the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Evolutionists tend to hide in the weeds of the unknown with an argument from ignorance: "If you can't prove, by empirical science, that evolution is impossible, then it happened." By empirical science alone, we can only prove probabilities. The probabilities show the Big-Bang-Billions-of-Years-No-Flood-Molecules-to-Man story to be a bazaar hypothesis, a story that is so improbable that it should not be considered. However, empirical science is not a tool that can prove anything to be true or false absolutely. For absolute proof, we have revelation. (See Basic and Concise Guide to Practical, Useful Logic and Reasoning). God says that He created everything. He is the One Who enforces the laws of nature. He is the One Who will judge all of us in the end. We know that because we know Him presonally through the indwelling Presence of Jesus Christ and the moment-by-moment instruction of the Holy Spirit.
Even if these problems didn't exist and even if evolution were possible, it would still be a fable, a story based on arbitrary assumptions and rationalizations. It would still be a lie. God says that it didn't happen. God says He created everything is six days.
The Evolutionists say that unborn children are living human beings but not real persons, but the creationists say they are real persons. Not too many years ago, the Evolutionists claimed that people who were not Caucasian were not real persons.
One other point, the Human Mind is not to be trusted. God didn't create the Human Mind to operate outside of the anointing of the Holy Spirit. God designed the Human Mind to work correctly only when the Holy Spirit is flowing through it.
Numbers 15:39... and that ye seek not after your own mind and your own ability to observe, with which you used to commit fornication:
Rom 8:7 because the carnal mind is enmity against God, for it is not subject to the Law of God, neither indeed can it be.
Psalm 53:1 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.
Jeremiah 17:9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?
1 Corinthians 2:14 But the natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness to him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
Proverbs 28:26 He that trusteth in his own heart is a fool: but whoso walks wisely, he shall be delivered.
The arbitrary assumptions and insane rationalizations of ungodly people censor out any information that supports the existence of God. They set up a web of rules to filter out God. They will only accept those things that conform to Naturalism, materialism, and uniformitarianism. Naturalism claims that God does nothing. Materialism claims that there is no God or spiritual realm. Uniformitarianism claims that there was not creation and that there was no violent worldwide flood, as the Bible and numerous other historical accounts record. Whatever they observe that does not conform to this complex filter is censored. The way that it is censored can take several forms. The ungodly may boldly proclaim that, though the data appears to support God's version and refute the version of the ungodly, yet it still must be interpreted to mean just the opposite of what it does mean. A backup method that ungodly people use is to prophecy that in the future, science will be able to explain what they see as an anomaly. If that fails, they will hide the data, set it aside, or lie to keep the public from knowing the truth. The data clearly demolishes the story of the ungodly and clearly supports the reality of the Creator God, His Bible, and His abiding Presence in His people. When confronted with the obvious, a closed-minded ungodly person says, "I can't understand it." They are willingly ignorant because they refuse to hold God in their knowledge. The reality is that these people, for whatever reason, don't what to know the Creator. They don't want to truly know Jesus, their Creator.
Last updated: Nov, 2011
Toons & Vids
If You Make It Up, It's Not True. It's Just Something You Made Up.
Who is lying; is it the Ungodly Evolutionists or the Bible-Believing Christians?
Rationalism Comes Naturally
Rationalism Causes Denominations And Divisions And Many Arguments
What about when theologians and Bible scholars use rationalized speculation? It's a bad thing.
Is the fact that you made something up a valid reason to believe it?
What types of ideas can be rationalized?
What Is The Circular Reasoning That Says That Rationalized Speculations Are Valid?
Numbers 15:39 speaks to the issue of speculation. Avoid speculation and don't follow speculators.
Why does rationalized speculation, such as evolution, lead to violence and abuse?
Why Is It Necessary To Set The Record Straight Regarding All The Fantasy Science, Junk Science, That's Out There?
How can you recognize junk science and speculation cloaked as science?
Do Evolutionists, Atheists, Agnostics, or Secular Humanists use real logic?
Why Are Evolutionism's Rationalized Speculations False
What is the difference between rationalism and rationalized speculation?
SSWAAFT? What is a SSWAAFT?
Rationalized Speculation! It's surprising how silly it is, yet intelligent people accept it.
The Counsel of the Ungodly
Answer to Critic
Appeal to Possibility
Argument to the Future
Love Between a Man and Woman
Righteousness & Holiness
Proof by Atheism
Scriptures About Marriage
The Reason for Rejecting Truth
Witness on the Internet
Flaky Human Reasoning
How Do You Know?
The Real Purpose of the Church
The Real Purpose of Life
From Glory to Glory
REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT
REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT
How to be Led by God
How to Witness
Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality
Holiness & Mind/Soul
Redemption: Free From Sin
Stories Versus Revelation
Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty?
How Can We Know Anything?
Mind Designed to Relate to God
Answers for the Confused
Fossil Record Says: "Creation"
Avoid These Pitfalls
Public School's Religion
Public School Failures