click here to learn more about being redeemed from sin and set free to serve God in spirit and in truth. click here to learn more about holiness click here to learn more about being changed into the same image click here to learn more about sowing and reaping click here to learn more about the free gift of righteousness. click here to learn more about how faith gives us access to grace and grace does the works. click here to learn more about faith and how it comes. click here to learn more about acknowledging Jesus click here to learn more about how God speaks Who will you listen to?  Click here to learn more. click here to learn more about the pattern of God. click here to learn more about the pattern of God for individuals, marriage, and family. click here to learn more about the pattern of God for the local church click here to learn more about the Church universal
SeekFind Logo Menu

Creation is Science because it is Reality and Truth


Evolutionists sometimes say that Creation science is not science. That is a religious argument on their part. They are defining science in terms of their religion, Materialism, Naturalism, Uniformitarianism, and Evolutionism. In so doing, they are using circular reasoning.

Creation scientists take the position that some things that are called, "science," are not science.

Creation scientists support these definitions of science:

  1. If science means knowledge, then creation scientist are not against that.
  2. If science means the methodology by which we are able to make repeatable, testable observations to gain knowledge, creations scientists are not against that. Creationists acknowledge that neither evolution nor creation can be evaluated by this method, but both must be evaluated using historical science, sometimes called forensic science.
  3. Creation scientists acknowledge that no discipline that seeks to determine what happened in the past is capable of repeatable, testable observation of past events. Though many scientific methods may be applied in order to analyze artifacts, fossils, rock layers, and other things that point to past events, every bit of data that is analyzed must be interpreted by a person in the present. That person must make assumptions. Evolution scientists make Evolution-ism's assumptions. Creation scientists don't make Evolution-ism's assumptions. Many Evolutionists claim that science must make Evolution-ism's assumptions. They claim that assumptions are valid science. Creationists do not agree on this point with Evolutionists.

Creation scientists have conflicts with Evolution scientists who try to use the word, "science," in the following ways:

  1. Many Evolution scientists claim that science must begin with assumptions like the following: that evolution is fact, there is no God, there was no flood, there was no creation, and if there was God, He would not be almighty and would not be in control of anything. Many Evolution scientists claim that any data the conflicts with these types of assumptions must be discarded.
  2. Many Evolution scientists refuse to acknowledge the fact that their conclusions would change drastically if they were to change their starting assumptions. Such closed-mindedness is not considered science by Creation scientists.
  3. Many Evolution scientists resort to faulty reasoning and flimflam. For instance, every dating method is based on circular reasoning. If the assumptions are changed, the dates change. Creation scientists do no believe that faulty reasoning and flimflam is science.

The real problem that the Evolution scientists have is that they think their assumptions are more valid than the Creation scientists. The assumptions change the interpretations completely.

The Amazingly Designed Human Body: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6

Last updated: Nov, 2011
How God Will Transform You - FREE Book  

Bread Crumbs

Home     >   Meaning     >   Christian Witness     >   Answers for Witness     >   Stories Versus Revelation     >   Creation, Flood, Etc.     >   Creation v. Evolution     >   Evolution is Flim-flam     >   The Wild Story     >   Creation is Science








Toons & Vids



Illustration of God's Obviousness: Stare At This Picture For 60 Seconds. A Giraffe Will Appear.

Is There Really Proof Of Creation?

Creation is Science because it is Reality and Truth

Why Does The Fossil Record Point To Creation and the World-Wide Flood?

Does geology really show convincing evidence for a world-wide flood?

Why does the fossil evidence point to a world-wide flood rather than evolution?

Does The Bible Say There Were Six Literal Days Of Creation?

First Century Historian, Flavius Josephus, Saw The Genesis Creation Account As History.



Answer to Critic

Appeal to Possibility

Circular Reasoning

Argument to the Future

Insignificant Cause

Word Magic

Love Between a Man and Woman


Colossians 2

Righteousness & Holiness

Don't Compromise


Proof by Atheism

Scriptures About Marriage

Genuine Authority

The Reason for Rejecting Truth

Witness on the Internet

Flaky Human Reasoning

How Do You Know?


The Real Purpose of the Church

The Real Purpose of Life

From Glory to Glory

REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT

REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT

How to be Led by God

How to Witness

Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality

Holiness & Mind/Soul

Redemption: Free From Sin

Real Reality

Stories Versus Revelation

Understanding Logic

Logical Fallacies

Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty?

How Can We Know Anything?

God's Word

God's Process

God's Pattern

Mind Designed to Relate to God

Answers for the Confused

Fossil Record Says: "Creation"

Avoid These Pitfalls

Public School's Religion

Twisting Science


Public School Failures

Twisting History

How can we know anything about anything? That's the real question

more info: mouseover or click

The complexity of Gods Way understood in a single diagram
Obey your flesh and descend into darkness