Evolution's Cultic Dogma

Here is a quick explanation of why evolution is religious dogma of many cults and it is not science.

EVOLUTION IS A SERIES OF BROKEN ARGUMENTS

A common tactic of Evolutionists is to stack one bogus argument on top of another and continue this process hoping to bury you in the debris. On examining each argument, you find that not one of them has any value. Since they have no real arguments left, many Evolutionists are even turning to New Age Magic religions.

Evolution is not based on science but on an untestable, unproven philosophy called Naturalism. The idea that a large body of scientific knowledge support evolution is a carefully created illusion. If evolution were a real theory and not a religion, it would have been abandoned long ago.

Evolution is a failed hypothesis that is jealously defended by well presented untruths and extreme message control.

Creationism is a label for that which is obvious.

CREATION IS OBVIOUS

Creation is obvious. Nothing creates itself. Seeing is believing--Illustration

Mutations cause a loss of information, but, if there actually were such a thing as Evolution, it would require the addition of information. That just doesn't happen except in the imagination of Evolutionists. (Read the latest science on the subject: Without Excuse by Werner Gitt, a description of the scientific Laws of Universal Information. See also: Information Theory Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4. Here is another interesting article.) More is constantly being learned about information and about the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Evolutionists tend to hide in the weeds of the unknown with an argument from ignorance: "If you can't prove, by empirical science, that evolution is impossible, then it happened." By empirical science alone, we can only prove probabilities. The probabilities show the Big-Bang-Billions-of-Years-No-Flood-Molecules-to-Man story to be a bazaar hypothesis, a story that is so improbable that it should not be considered. However, empirical science is not a tool that can prove anything to be true or false absolutely. For absolute proof, we have revelation. (See Basic and Concise Guide to Practical, Useful Logic and Reasoning). God says that He created everything. He is the One Who enforces the laws of nature. He is the One Who will judge all of us in the end. We know that because we know Him presonally through the indwelling Presence of Jesus Christ and the moment-by-moment instruction of the Holy Spirit.

NO ONE HAS EVER SEEN EVIDENCE OF EVOLUTION

The transmutation of reptiles into birds and mammals, or of apes into men, or any other "upward" changes is void of scientific proof. Surely something like this would leave some evidence... but there is none. None!

No one has ever seen Evolution happen. When they are being honest, scientists agree that, if Evolution actually did happen, then there should be many indisputable "transitional forms" that we could observe among the fossils. If Evolution had actually taken place, millions of "transitional" forms would be there, but they are not. There are no verifiable "transitional forms"--NONE. There are only a handful of very disputable so-called "transitional forms". "In all the billions of fossils known to exist, not one example of a real Evolutionary transformational series has ever been found." http://icr.org/index.php?module=articles&action=view&ID=2477 At any given time there are always a couple of instances of Evolutionists having claimed to have found some transitional form, but these are always shown to be either frauds or errors within a number of years. Evolutionary Growth Has Never Been Observed?

"What makes the question complex is that in place of the countless thousands of transitional forms expected (as Darwin logically indicated should be found, and anticipated would be found in future), there exists at any point in time a handful of candidates, i.e. fossils put forward as transitional forms by evolutionary proponents. [Note: By 'transitional forms' is meant here fossils showing intermediate stages between major evolutionary transitions, i.e. from one kind of creature to a wholly different kind. For example, stages in the supposed transition of a walking reptile to a flying bird, nothing which creationists could regard as variation/speciation within a kind. Some evolutionists argue that we have countless thousands of transitional fossils, but they empty the term 'transitional fossil' of any content really meaningful for the creation-evolution debate. They define a fossil as 'transitional' in the same sense that a car is 'transitional' between a unicycle and a truck. That is not in view here.] Creationists by definition would argue that there are none, so to evolutionists this is seen as 'proof'. From a creation perspective, though, consider the following:" Go to http://creation.com/missing-links-parade for the rest of this article.

THE FOSSIL RECORD POINTS TO CREATION

The fossil record is one of the best arguments against Evolution. In the modern world we see dogs and cats and bears and other kinds. In the fossil record, we also see dogs and cats and bears and other kinds, but not any in-between forms. Evolution is not happening now and there are no indications that it ever has happened.

MICRO-EVOLUTION IS AN EXAMPLE OF FLIM FLAM

Evolutionists refer to two unrelated processes as if they had something to do with each other, which they do not.

1. The first unrelated, process is variation that occurs by using the information in the DNA molecule. When living cells use existing, inherited information, this is not evolution, nor could it possibly lead to anything new since it is inherited information from the parent that is allowing the variation. The only reason anyone would want to apply the word, Evolution, to this process would be to cause confusion, confusion which is used to deceive.

2. The second unrelated, process is that of mutating. Time and chance CANNOT add information or organization to a DNA molecule. Random events never produce organization and information, just as rocks never roll up hills unless some outside force rolls them up the hill. The term, micro-evolution is deceptive in that it implies that many small changes will add up to a big change over time, but that is not the issue at all. The issue is not the size or number of changes. The issue is the direction of change. There is no evidence that a mutation can every add information to the cells. As far as what can be observed, that is, science, all mutation removes information. The molecules-to-man evolution conjecture / fabrication would require that mutations would add information.

It should be obvious to anyone that natural selection has no mechanism to add information to anything. It only selects from what is already available.

THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS PROVES CREATION

Time and chance result in less information and less organization. Evolution has a very real information problem. That is the proven Second Law of Thermodynamics and Information Theory. Adding energy from an external source, as the Japanese did to Pearl Harbor and the U.S. did to Hiroshima a few decades ago, just makes things worse. Only if there is a mechanism to control, direct, and use that energy according to a plan will there be any benefit from outside energy. When Evolutionists claim that adding energy reverses the Second Law of Thermodynamics, they are either showing ignorance or showing a willingness to lie.

see also, Thermodynamics: David Berlinski, The Deniable Darwin

The Evolutionists will tell you a half truth about the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The Evolutionists will tell the half truth: "The Second Law of Thermodynamics only applies to isolated systems, so it's not relevant to evolution, because the Earth is an open system." This is a clever lie. Here is the part of the truth that they are withholding: the Second Law of Thermodynamics was derived using theoretical isolated systems, but it applies to all systems, and can only be overcome locally and temporarily in open systems when stringent conditions are met. Not only that, but we are not talking about the Earth. The Earth is just a subsystem of a much larger system called the Universe. The Universe is an isolated system. Evolutionists claim that Evolution took place in this isolated system, but the Second Law of Thermodynamics tells us that their story is a myth.

More information on the Second Law of Thermodynamics can be found here & here & here & here & here

THE COMPLEXITY OF CREATION PROVES THAT IT WAS CREATED

Even the most simple cell is complex beyond our ability to understand. It is insane for Evolutionists say that it popped into existence by chance. Nothing complex comes into existence by time and chance.

GEOLOGY SHOWS EVIDENCE OF THE FLOOD

There is evidence of a restructuring of the planet on a scale and in a way that would be consistent with a world-wide flood. The types of restructuring that is evident is difficult to interpret in any other way other than that there was a world-wide, catastrophic flood followed by a shifting of the Earth's surface in which the ocean areas went down and the continents and mountains went up.

BIG BANG IS BALONEY

The big bang theory is not even a hypothesis let alone a theory. The universe is, in fact, an open system, and God, Who is outside of the system, created it. No other explanation works.

EVOLUTION IS NOT EVEN A THEORY

A theory, to an Evolutionist, is defined as something that has been proved. There is not a shred of proof for the fairy tale we call "Evolution."

DNA IS PROOF OF CREATION

The scientific observations regarding DNA have not helped the case of the Evolutionists except to create a new area where they can get away with telling half-truths because the public is not aware of the details of DNA research. Sometimes, Evolutionists even claim that DNA evidence supports Evolution, but it does not. The complexity of DNA is proof of creation.

EVOLUTION IS RELIGIOUS DOGMA

Evolution is a doctrine of several New Age religions. There is no real science in Evolution.

EVOLUTION IS NOT REASONABLE

Creationists and Evolutionists are looking at the same facts but coming up with different conclusions. We need to decide what is a valid thought. This is really the basis of the difference between the two arguments. What authority will govern how we interpret facts.

Evolutionists try to say that they are neutral, but they are not. Evolutionists assume no God, no flood, no miracles, no spirits, no creation, rejecting all observation that conflicts with these assumptions. Creationists have no such presuppositions and take their observations as ample evidence of God, the worldwide flood, miracles, spirits, and creation.

EVOLUTION IS POLITICAL

Evolutionism stays politically alive by using false claims, claims that are later proven false. By the time one false Evolutionistic claim is proven to be false, the Evolutionists have developed a new false claim to take its place.

THE BIBLE IS STILL UNCHALLENGED

All attempts have failed to find an error or inconsistency in the Bible. All attempts have failed to explain away the miracles in the Bible using the assumptions of Naturalism, materialism and uniformitarianism.

EVOLUTION IS FRAUD

Fraud is being committed repeatedly by the Evolutionists. Evolutionists even continue to use many of the frauds of the past, knowing that they are obvious frauds that have already been debunked. They continue to present as fact information that is very questionable. Some of the evolutionists have admitted that these frauds and lies are intentional and they try to rationalize various defenses of the deceptive methods and practices. Of course, once the Bible is taken out of the picture, by what standard would it be wrong to lie?

This is only a smattering of facts, but is more than enough to prove that Evolution is a foolish fairy tale. If you care to really find out all the facts, they are available. Evolution is a scientific impossibility. And the ungodly public schools lie about Evolution to the kids in public schools. They teach this lie as if it had validity. What a shame!

Related Links:

• Bias of Unbiased Scientists