If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.

The Obvious: Information, Complexity, and Order Do not Happen by Chance  

Both the Bible and science agree: God created the heavens and the earth.

Every single method of testing the age of the earth is based on circular reasoning. In other words, you need to know the age you want it to be before you make your assumptions and do the math. At that point, your assumptions and math can be used to prove that the earth is as old as you want it to be. We can't even deny the possibility that God could have done something that Scripture doesn't hint at and that has left no scientific evidence. To deny it would be a logical fallacy known as a universal negative. It is possible. It just is not worth the time to think about it.

Even the most simple cell is complex beyond our ability to understand. How dare the evolutionists say that it popped into existence by chance. Nothing complex comes into existence by time and chance.

Evolution made a lot more sense, as a hypothesis, when scientists were convinced that there was such a thing as a simple cell. They used to think that life spontaneously popped into existence once in a while. They thought that the cell was a sort of a blob of jelly. They thought that information could be added through random chance, a premise that would be necessary if there were such a thing as evolution creating all the various kinds of plants and animals. (Read the latest science on the subject: Without Excuse by Werner Gitt, a description of the scientific Laws of Universal Information. See also: Information Theory Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4. Here is another interesting article.) More is constantly being learned about information and about the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Evolutionists tend to hide in the weeds of the unknown with an argument from ignorance: "If you can't prove, by empirical science, that evolution is impossible, then it happened." By empirical science alone, we can only prove probabilities. The probabilities show the Big-Bang-Billions-of-Years-No-Flood-Molecules-to-Man story to be a bazaar hypothesis, a story that is so improbable that it should not be considered. However, empirical science is not a tool that can prove anything to be true or false absolutely. For absolute proof, we have revelation. (See Basic and Concise Guide to Practical, Useful Logic and Reasoning). God says that He created everything. He is the One Who enforces the laws of nature. He is the One Who will judge all of us in the end. We know that because we know Him presonally through the indwelling Presence of Jesus Christ and the moment-by-moment instruction of the Holy Spirit.

No serious scientist can now believe these things.

There has been an untruth that is still being taught regarding the origin of life, This is the obvious untruth that life was created in a laboratory. That is far from the truth. Life has never been created in a laboratory, nor was anything close to life created. For many reasons, the experiment that is often cited, Stanley Miller's experiment, actually shows that we don't really know of a way that life could possibly have come into being naturally.  The media and educational elitists, however, have put a spin on it and have told a lie to millions of students.  In defense of most of the media and educators, they were lied to and they just repeated the lie in ignorance. Sadly, this lie is still being repeated in the classrooms and students are being deceived.  In the same way, Craig Venter produced what he called "synthetic life" using the already created information and reading machinery of previously living cells. Evolution has a very real information problem. No new, innovative information is ever created in cells by any natural means. I never happens.

Ungodly people filter God's evidence that He gave them. They do this using fabricated stories (evolution, big bang, supposed errors in the Bible, scientism, etc) that are based on assumptions. The reason they do this is because they have refused to acknowledge God for so long that God has turned them over to a useless and evil mind.  They set up a web of rules to filter out God.  They will only accept those things that conform to Naturalism, materialism, and uniformitarianism.  Naturalism claims that God does nothing.  Materialism claims that there is no God or spiritual realm.  Uniformitarianism claims that there was not creation and that there was no violent worldwide flood, as the Bible and numerous other historical accounts record.  Whatever they observe that does not conform to this complex filter is censored.  The way that it is censored can take several forms.  The ungodly may boldly proclaim that, though the data appears to support God's version and refute the version of the ungodly, yet it still must be interpreted to mean just the opposite of what it does mean.  A backup method that ungodly people use is to prophecy that in the future, science will be able to explain what they see as an anomaly.  If that fails, they will hide the data, set it aside, or lie to keep the public from knowing the truth.  The data clearly demolishes the story of the ungodly and clearly supports the reality of the Creator God, His Bible, and His abiding Presence in His people.  When confronted with the obvious, a closed-minded ungodly person says, "I can't understand it."  They are willingly ignorant because they refuse to hold God in their knowledge.  The reality is that these people, for whatever reason, don't what to know the Creator.  They don't want to truly know Jesus, their Creator.