This page is provided to answer a specific question, but don't get tied up in detail and forget where you are going. You get past the questions/attacks so you can proclaim the Gospel. It is the proclamation of the Gospel, not argumentation, that transforms minds. See Give Them the Gospel.

Fraud is being committed repeatedly by the evolutionists. They lie about Natural Selection, claiming that Natural Selection is Evolution.  Natural Selection is not Evolution.  They observe Natural Selection and claim to have observed Evolution.  They have not observed Evolution but they have observed Natural Selection, the elimination of some living things when situations give an extreme deadly disadvantage to one group of living things.  And, Natural Selection has no means of adding new innovative genetic information of the type needed for even the smallest advance in so-called molecules-to-man evolution to the genome. (Read the latest science on the subject: Without Excuse by Werner Gitt, a description of the scientific Laws of Universal Information. See also: Information Theory Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4. Here is another interesting article.) More is constantly being learned about information and about the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Evolutionists tend to hide in the weeds of the unknown with an argument from ignorance: "If you can't prove, by empirical science, that evolution is impossible, then it happened." By empirical science alone, we can only prove probabilities. The probabilities show the Big-Bang-Billions-of-Years-No-Flood-Molecules-to-Man story to be a bazaar hypothesis, a story that is so improbable that it should not be considered. However, empirical science is not a tool that can prove anything to be true or false absolutely. For absolute proof, we have revelation. (See Basic and Concise Guide to Practical, Useful Logic and Reasoning). God says that He created everything. He is the One Who enforces the laws of nature. He is the One Who will judge all of us in the end. We know that because we know Him presonally through the indwelling Presence of Jesus Christ and the moment-by-moment instruction of the Holy Spirit.

And that is just one of the Evolutionist's many unsolvable problems.  For many Evolutionists, it's just a matter of keeping the government money coming.  Evolutionists even continue to use many of the frauds of the past, knowing that they are obvious frauds that have already been debunked. They continue to present information that is very questionable as if it were fact. They speak about natural selection as though it has a mind and develops designs and executes development of those plans. That is just insane.  There is absolutely no method for adding the kind of new innovative information that would be absolutely necessary for even the smallest supposed molecules-to-man evolutionary advancement.  (see no info is ever added) The whole idea of emphasis on Natural Selection is a mind trick to fool people into believing that somehow Natural Selection creates Evolution, when it does not.  When these questionable tactics are exposed and shown to be deceptive, evolutionists tend to continue to use them. Sometimes, they will try to justify this with strange "logic" similar to the logic of Dan Rather and the ungodly press: "Well, all my proof has been shown to be dishonest and fraudulent, but what I asserted is still true." Some of the evolutionists have admitted that these frauds and lies are intentional and they try to rationalize various defenses of the deceptive methods and practices. Of course, once the Bible is taken out of the picture, by what standard would it be wrong to lie?

New innovative genetic information of the type needed for even the smallest advance in so-called molecules-to-man evolution would need to be generated by natural means.  It never happens.

The following chart makes it plain that every instance of supposed increase of information that is used by Evolution's evangelists is an example of NO increase in information.  Evolutionist's claims for adding information fall into three categories.  These are the 3 Rs of Evolution: Rearrange information, Remove information, and Ruin information.  See: The 3 Rs of evolution  

Using an analogy of a train, Evolution hopes to go from Missouri in Central U.S. to California.  However, the train is going the wrong direction toward New York, with each small change being the result of a loss of information or simply a rearrangement of what is already there.  The evolution train’s a-comin’

Depending on which definition you use, Natural Selection can be real.  It works to eliminate severe mutations.  Natural Selection can mean different things depending on the context in which it is used, though.  Some of those contexts actually try to transform Natural Selection into molecules-to-man Evolution.  They also try to confuse people into believing that small adaptations (calling this micro-evolution, which is a deceiving term.) add up to molecules-to-man Evolution.  At other times, Natural Selection is written about as if it were an intelligent all-powerful god that thinks things through and does them.  But Natural Selection as a description of the way that severe mutations result in the death of the mutated life form is real.  It can't add information and it appears that mutation never adds any information either.  At least, no one has ever been able to observe information being added despite many tax dollars trying to do so.  Evolution has a very real information problem. Most mutations aren't detrimental enough, however, for Natural Selection to operate.  Small mutations can build up in a population over time and cause extinction.  It is illegitimate to use Natural Selection to support Evolution.  Natural Selection supports a young Earth and a Creator. Mutations cause a loss of information. They have never been observed creating new information.