click here to learn more about being redeemed from sin and set free to serve God in spirit and in truth. click here to learn more about holiness click here to learn more about being changed into the same image click here to learn more about sowing and reaping click here to learn more about the free gift of righteousness. click here to learn more about how faith gives us access to grace and grace does the works. click here to learn more about faith and how it comes. click here to learn more about acknowledging Jesus click here to learn more about how God speaks Who will you listen to?  Click here to learn more. click here to learn more about the pattern of God. click here to learn more about the pattern of God for individuals, marriage, and family. click here to learn more about the pattern of God for the local church click here to learn more about the Church universal
SeekFind Logo Menu

Feedback: Evolution has nothing to do with creation


If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.

Does Evolutionism Have a Dependency on Abiogenesis?

Feedback: "evolution has nothing to do with creation or how life formed from non-life. that is abiogenesis. evolution is change over time."

Dear Reader,

Thank you for your comment.

Your feedback brings up a matter of semantics, acually equivocation. Many Evolutionists want abiogenesis split from the Evolutionistic story. The stories to support abiogenesis are so wild that they want nothing to do with them. That is fine, because the stories of Evolutionism--once the Evolutionist is past the concept of the first cell popping into existence--are also beyond belief. Both concepts are in direct opposition to all that has been observed. No one has seen information added to anything by random chance. No one has ever observed any working mechanism, not even something as simple as an electric egg beater, design itself.

Here is something else that Evolution is not. Evolution is not science. It is religion.

On the other hand, one of the stories that some Evolutionists tell is that the cell did somehow evolve into being by natural selection.    It is illegitimate to use Natural Selection to support Evolution.  Natural Selection supports a young Earth and a Creator.  For instance, read this article: The Cell: Evolution of the First Organism (New Biology) In addition, many Evolutionists tell stories about chemical evolution, stellar evolution, and cosmological evolution. So this is a matter of semantics being used to confuse those who can be fooled by it. I don't say that every Evolutionist means to confuse others, but they do confuse others none the less.

It doesn't matter what you call it. For anyone to claim that a cell could pop into being by any natural process is insane. Abiogenesis is impossible. But the Evolutionists want to turn the burden of proof onto the Biblical Christians. They want to say that the Biblical Christians must prove that abiogenesis could never happen. It is impossible to prove a universal negative. The only sane answer is that the Almighty Creator God made the cell and everything else.

The word, Evolution, is used by Evolutionists to confuse people and create a false sense of the validity of the theory. Evolutionists tend to can change meaning of the word, Evolution, many times in the same paragraph or discussion. The Evolutionist will say that we can observe evolution (meaning the variations that are available in the information that God put into the cell) in plants and animals and so we can see that Evolution (meaning molecules to man stories) is a scientific fact. This is deception.

"Daniel Dennett, another of the "Four Horsemen" of the New Atheism, has argued that Darwin's Theory of Evolution [it isn't a theory in the sense of a scientific theory but is actually a conjecture or a fabrication] is a "universal acid" that will burn away all claims of the existence of God. His confidence in Darwinism is total. He looks back longingly at his own childhood belief in a divinely-created world and argues that, eventually, his experience of moving from belief in creation to confidence in evolution will be shared by a humanity that grows into intellectual adulthood.

Dennett is honest enough to recognize that if the Story of Evolution is true, it must eventually offer an account of everything related to the question of life. Thus, evolution will have to explain every aspect of life, from how a species appeared to why a mother loves her child. Interestingly, he offers an argument for why humans have believed in the existence of God." ~ Albert Mohler

Ungodly people will swallow any lie against God but are skeptical of any of the proof God has provided so readily. The ungodly embrace simple-minded assumptions without an ounce of skepticism.  These assumptions become filters and a way to censor out any information that supports the existence of God.  They set up a web of rules to filter out God.  They will only accept those things that conform to Naturalism, materialism, and uniformitarianism.  Naturalism claims that God does nothing.  Materialism claims that there is no God or spiritual realm.  Uniformitarianism claims that there was not creation and that there was no violent worldwide flood, as the Bible and numerous other historical accounts record.  Whatever they observe that does not conform to this complex filter is censored.  The way that it is censored can take several forms.  The ungodly may boldly proclaim that, though the data appears to support God's version and refute the version of the ungodly, yet it still must be interpreted to mean just the opposite of what it does mean.  A backup method that ungodly people use is to prophecy that in the future, science will be able to explain what they see as an anomaly.  If that fails, they will hide the data, set it aside, or lie to keep the public from knowing the truth.  The data clearly demolishes the story of the ungodly and clearly supports the reality of the Creator God, His Bible, and His abiding Presence in His people.  When confronted with the obvious, a closed-minded ungodly person says, "I can't understand it."  They are willingly ignorant because they refuse to hold God in their knowledge.  The reality is that these people, for whatever reason, don't what to know the Creator.  They don't want to truly know Jesus, their Creator.



Last updated: Jun, 2013
How God Will Transform You - FREE Book  

Bread Crumbs

Home     >   Meaning     >   Christian Witness     >   Answers for Witness     >   Stories Versus Revelation     >   Creation, Flood, Etc.     >   Creation v. Evolution     >   The Problems with Evolution     >   Life Is Not Self-Creating     >   Feedback: Abiogenesis








Toons & Vids



How do evolutionists deal with the concept of spontaneous generation of life?

Feedback: Evolution has nothing to do with creation


Questions and Answers



Answer to Critic

Appeal to Possibility

Circular Reasoning

Argument to the Future

Insignificant Cause

Word Magic

Love Between a Man and Woman


Colossians 2

Righteousness & Holiness

Don't Compromise


Proof by Atheism

Scriptures About Marriage

Genuine Authority

The Reason for Rejecting Truth

Witness on the Internet

Flaky Human Reasoning

How Do You Know?


The Real Purpose of the Church

The Real Purpose of Life

From Glory to Glory

REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT

REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT

How to be Led by God

How to Witness

Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality

Holiness & Mind/Soul

Redemption: Free From Sin

Real Reality

Stories Versus Revelation

Understanding Logic

Logical Fallacies

Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty?

How Can We Know Anything?

God's Word

God's Process

God's Pattern

Mind Designed to Relate to God

Answers for the Confused

Fossil Record Says: "Creation"

Avoid These Pitfalls

Public School's Religion

Twisting Science


Public School Failures

Twisting History

How can we know anything about anything? That's the real question

more info: mouseover or click

The complexity of Gods Way understood in a single diagram
Obey your flesh and descend into darkness