Liberals Are NOT Open-Minded

Worldly Liberals, including Evolutionists, strippers, the majority of public school teachers, people involved in all sorts of perversion, and News reporters, are only open to worldly liberal ideas. Actually, evolutionists are not open-minded to any ideas outside of the realm of worldly Liberalism. They are not open to the idea that God created the universe in six days, though that is what the physical evidence shows. They are not open to the idea that a great flood covered the planet several thousand years ago, though that is what the evidence shows. They are not open to the idea that the Bible has no errors, though that is what the evidence shows.

Detailed Answer

Consider how people who are trying to show themselves to be open-minded, such as Evolutionistic scientists or so-called intellectuals or members of the news media elite, might have come up with a doctrine like evolution. Evolutionists are open-minded, aren't they? After all, they are Evolutionistic scientists and not like mere mortals. Why is it that they need all the falsified proof and faulty reasoning on which to rest their case? Without these falsified proofs coupled with faulty logic, the entire evolutionist hypothesis comes unglued. Even in the presence of a complete, unbiased presentation of all the facts, the hypothesis of evolution falls apart. The people who believe in socialism are failing to deal with reality. They have their minds totally closed to the facts.

Are worldly liberals open-minded?

Evolutionists have been very effective because they have consistently (although falsely) claimed be fair, scientific, and open-minded. Liberal news casters do the same, but they are continually shown to be biased. How they hate to have anyone give an opinion that is not their own! They hate talk radio because it is not liberal. It is not socialist. It is not pro-sin. It is not anti-God nor is it anti-Christ.

Ungodly people are not open minded. They dogmatically hold presuppositions, which are just simple-minded assumptions.  You might ask, "How could anyone be dogmatic about an assumption, something that was just made up with no evidence?" These assumptions become filters to filter out reality. They are used to censor out any information that supports the existence of God.  These arbitrary assumptions are used to deny that Christians are experiencing what Christians are experiencing. That is wild. The ungodly set up a web of rules to filter out God.  They will only accept those things that conform to Naturalism, materialism, and uniformitarianism.  Naturalism is a lie that asserts that God does nothing.  Materialism claims that there is no God or spiritual realm.  Uniformitarianism claims that there was not creation and that there was no violent worldwide flood, as the Bible and numerous other historical accounts record.  Whatever they observe that does not conform to this complex filter is censored.  The way that it is censored can take several forms.  The ungodly may boldly proclaim that, though the data appears to support God's version and refute the version of the ungodly, yet it still must be interpreted to mean just the opposite of what it does mean.  A backup method that ungodly people use is to prophecy that in the future, science will be able to explain what they see as an anomaly.  If that fails, they will hide the data, set it aside, or lie to keep the public from knowing the truth.  The data clearly demolishes the story of the ungodly and clearly supports the reality of the Creator God, His Bible, and His abiding Presence in His people.  When confronted with the obvious, a closed-minded ungodly person says, "I can't understand it."  They are willingly ignorant because they refuse to hold God in their knowledge.  The reality is that these people, for whatever reason, don't what to know the Creator.  They don't want to truly know Jesus, their Creator.

The Humanism pushing news media elitists claim to be open-minded, fair, disciplined, balanced, and thorough, yet they only present the facts that prove their liberal case. They twist and add to the facts. And some facts, they just don't report. They don't report those things that work against the liberal dogma that they are trying to brainwash the public into believing. That is not real news, and Evolutionism is not real science.